diff mbox series

PCI: hv: Fix multi-MSI to allow more than one MSI vector

Message ID 1649772991-10285-1-git-send-email-quic_jhugo@quicinc.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series PCI: hv: Fix multi-MSI to allow more than one MSI vector | expand

Commit Message

Jeffrey Hugo April 12, 2022, 2:16 p.m. UTC
If the allocation of multiple MSI vectors for multi-MSI fails in the core
PCI framework, the framework will retry the allocation as a single MSI
vector, assuming that meets the min_vecs specified by the requesting
driver.

Hyper-V advertises that multi-MSI is supported, but reuses the VECTOR
domain to implement that for x86.  The VECTOR domain does not support
multi-MSI, so the alloc will always fail and fallback to a single MSI
allocation.

In short, Hyper-V advertises a capability it does not implement.

Hyper-V can support multi-MSI because it coordinates with the hypervisor
to map the MSIs in the IOMMU's interrupt remapper, which is something the
VECTOR domain does not have.  Therefore the fix is simple - copy what the
x86 IOMMU drivers (AMD/Intel-IR) do by removing
X86_IRQ_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS_VECTORS after calling the VECTOR domain's
pci_msi_prepare().

Fixes: 4daace0d8ce8 ("PCI: hv: Add paravirtual PCI front-end for Microsoft Hyper-V VMs")
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Dexuan Cui April 12, 2022, 7:12 p.m. UTC | #1
> From: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2022 7:17 AM
>  ...
> If the allocation of multiple MSI vectors for multi-MSI fails in the core
> PCI framework, the framework will retry the allocation as a single MSI
> vector, assuming that meets the min_vecs specified by the requesting
> driver.
> 
> Hyper-V advertises that multi-MSI is supported, but reuses the VECTOR
> domain to implement that for x86.  The VECTOR domain does not support
> multi-MSI, so the alloc will always fail and fallback to a single MSI
> allocation.
> 
> In short, Hyper-V advertises a capability it does not implement.
> 
> Hyper-V can support multi-MSI because it coordinates with the hypervisor
> to map the MSIs in the IOMMU's interrupt remapper, which is something the
> VECTOR domain does not have.  Therefore the fix is simple - copy what the
> x86 IOMMU drivers (AMD/Intel-IR) do by removing
> X86_IRQ_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS_VECTORS after calling the VECTOR domain's
> pci_msi_prepare().
> 
> Fixes: 4daace0d8ce8 ("PCI: hv: Add paravirtual PCI front-end for Microsoft
> Hyper-V VMs")
> Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>

Thanks for the fix! This looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Jeffrey Hugo April 12, 2022, 7:32 p.m. UTC | #2
On 4/12/2022 8:16 AM, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> If the allocation of multiple MSI vectors for multi-MSI fails in the core
> PCI framework, the framework will retry the allocation as a single MSI
> vector, assuming that meets the min_vecs specified by the requesting
> driver.
> 
> Hyper-V advertises that multi-MSI is supported, but reuses the VECTOR
> domain to implement that for x86.  The VECTOR domain does not support
> multi-MSI, so the alloc will always fail and fallback to a single MSI
> allocation.
> 
> In short, Hyper-V advertises a capability it does not implement.
> 
> Hyper-V can support multi-MSI because it coordinates with the hypervisor
> to map the MSIs in the IOMMU's interrupt remapper, which is something the
> VECTOR domain does not have.  Therefore the fix is simple - copy what the
> x86 IOMMU drivers (AMD/Intel-IR) do by removing
> X86_IRQ_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS_VECTORS after calling the VECTOR domain's
> pci_msi_prepare().
> 
> Fixes: 4daace0d8ce8 ("PCI: hv: Add paravirtual PCI front-end for Microsoft Hyper-V VMs")
> Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
> ---
>   drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> index d270a204..41be63e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> @@ -614,7 +614,16 @@ static void hv_set_msi_entry_from_desc(union hv_msi_entry *msi_entry,
>   static int hv_msi_prepare(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
>   			  int nvec, msi_alloc_info_t *info)
>   {
> -	return pci_msi_prepare(domain, dev, nvec, info);
> +	int ret = pci_msi_prepare(domain, dev, nvec, info);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * By using the interrupt remapper in the hypervisor IOMMU, contiguous
> +	 * CPU vectors in not needed for multi-MSI

I just noticed that "in" should be "is".

> +	 */
> +	if (info->type == X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_PCI_MSI)
> +		info->flags &= ~X86_IRQ_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS_VECTORS;
> +
> +	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   /**
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
index d270a204..41be63e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
@@ -614,7 +614,16 @@  static void hv_set_msi_entry_from_desc(union hv_msi_entry *msi_entry,
 static int hv_msi_prepare(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
 			  int nvec, msi_alloc_info_t *info)
 {
-	return pci_msi_prepare(domain, dev, nvec, info);
+	int ret = pci_msi_prepare(domain, dev, nvec, info);
+
+	/*
+	 * By using the interrupt remapper in the hypervisor IOMMU, contiguous
+	 * CPU vectors in not needed for multi-MSI
+	 */
+	if (info->type == X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_PCI_MSI)
+		info->flags &= ~X86_IRQ_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS_VECTORS;
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 /**