| Message ID | 42db911c-5eba-0511-3e8c-8011a2a5b44a@axentia.se (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add support for texas dac121c081 to the dac5571 driver | expand |
On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 22:46:30 +0200 Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> wrote: > Hi! > > The new chip works much like the other chips supported by the driver, so > this is just adding another compatible to the list. > > Chenages since v1: > - Guenter Roeck noticed elsewhere that my mail setup was botched and > that my patches were clobbered. Hopefully fixed. *blush* > - added tags from Sean Nyekjaer and Rob Herring Applied. Thanks Jonathan > > Cheers, > Peter > > Peter Rosin (2): > dt-bindings: iio: ti-dac5571: Add ti,dac121c081 > iio: dac: ti-dac5571: add support for ti,dac121c081 > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/ti,dac5571.yaml | 1 + > drivers/iio/dac/Kconfig | 2 +- > drivers/iio/dac/ti-dac5571.c | 3 +++ > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 20:44:39 +0100 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 22:46:30 +0200 > Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > The new chip works much like the other chips supported by the driver, so > > this is just adding another compatible to the list. > > > > Chenages since v1: > > - Guenter Roeck noticed elsewhere that my mail setup was botched and > > that my patches were clobbered. Hopefully fixed. *blush* > > - added tags from Sean Nyekjaer and Rob Herring > > Applied. Thanks Backed out temporarily because they have crossed with a fix (that I'd forgotten about) and were requiring a non trivial merge in linux-next. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-iio/patch/20220324234340.32402-1-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com/ Hopefully that will get resolved in my upstream fairly soon and I can fix this one up whilst applying it myself. Thanks, Jonathan > > Jonathan > > > > > Cheers, > > Peter > > > > Peter Rosin (2): > > dt-bindings: iio: ti-dac5571: Add ti,dac121c081 > > iio: dac: ti-dac5571: add support for ti,dac121c081 > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/ti,dac5571.yaml | 1 + > > drivers/iio/dac/Kconfig | 2 +- > > drivers/iio/dac/ti-dac5571.c | 3 +++ > > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > >
HI! 2022-05-01 at 20:03, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 20:44:39 +0100 > Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 22:46:30 +0200 >> Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> The new chip works much like the other chips supported by the driver, so >>> this is just adding another compatible to the list. >>> >>> Chenages since v1: >>> - Guenter Roeck noticed elsewhere that my mail setup was botched and >>> that my patches were clobbered. Hopefully fixed. *blush* >>> - added tags from Sean Nyekjaer and Rob Herring >> >> Applied. Thanks > > Backed out temporarily because they have crossed with a fix (that I'd > forgotten about) and were requiring a non trivial merge in linux-next. > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-iio/patch/20220324234340.32402-1-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com/ > > Hopefully that will get resolved in my upstream fairly soon and I can > fix this one up whilst applying it myself. Looks like it might be time to bring this one in from the cold? Cheers, Peter
On Thu, 12 May 2022 10:59:48 +0200 Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> wrote: > HI! > > 2022-05-01 at 20:03, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 20:44:39 +0100 > > Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 22:46:30 +0200 > >> Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi! > >>> > >>> The new chip works much like the other chips supported by the driver, so > >>> this is just adding another compatible to the list. > >>> > >>> Chenages since v1: > >>> - Guenter Roeck noticed elsewhere that my mail setup was botched and > >>> that my patches were clobbered. Hopefully fixed. *blush* > >>> - added tags from Sean Nyekjaer and Rob Herring > >> > >> Applied. Thanks > > > > Backed out temporarily because they have crossed with a fix (that I'd > > forgotten about) and were requiring a non trivial merge in linux-next. > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-iio/patch/20220324234340.32402-1-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com/ > > > > Hopefully that will get resolved in my upstream fairly soon and I can > > fix this one up whilst applying it myself. > > Looks like it might be time to bring this one in from the cold? Nearly. I have a pull request out to Greg. Once he's taken that I'll fastforward the togreg branch to include the fix and can then apply this. Jonathan > > Cheers, > Peter
On Thu, 12 May 2022 14:02:32 +0100 Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> wrote: > On Thu, 12 May 2022 10:59:48 +0200 > Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> wrote: > > > HI! > > > > 2022-05-01 at 20:03, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 20:44:39 +0100 > > > Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > >> On Mon, 25 Apr 2022 22:46:30 +0200 > > >> Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi! > > >>> > > >>> The new chip works much like the other chips supported by the driver, so > > >>> this is just adding another compatible to the list. > > >>> > > >>> Chenages since v1: > > >>> - Guenter Roeck noticed elsewhere that my mail setup was botched and > > >>> that my patches were clobbered. Hopefully fixed. *blush* > > >>> - added tags from Sean Nyekjaer and Rob Herring > > >> > > >> Applied. Thanks > > > > > > Backed out temporarily because they have crossed with a fix (that I'd > > > forgotten about) and were requiring a non trivial merge in linux-next. > > > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-iio/patch/20220324234340.32402-1-laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com/ > > > > > > Hopefully that will get resolved in my upstream fairly soon and I can > > > fix this one up whilst applying it myself. > > > > Looks like it might be time to bring this one in from the cold? > > Nearly. I have a pull request out to Greg. Once he's taken that > I'll fastforward the togreg branch to include the fix and > can then apply this. Now we are good. Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and added the tweak needed to provide data in the of_device_id table. Unfortunately timing is against me this time, and unless the merge window is delayed this is now 5.20 material. Thanks, Jonathan > > Jonathan > > > > > Cheers, > > Peter >