| Message ID | 20220430130922.3504268-7-mail@conchuod.ie (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | PolarFire SoC dt for 5.19 | expand |
On 30/04/2022 15:09, Conor Dooley wrote: > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > > Sundance DSP Inc. (https://www.sundancedsp.com/) is a supplier of > high-performance DSP and FPGA processor boards and I/O modules. > > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <mail@conchuod.ie> If your @microchip.com email still works, then there is no need to double-sign it. At the end you are still the same person... unless you're not. :) This applies to your other patches as well. Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml > index 01430973ecec..1d47a38c2a2e 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml > @@ -1197,6 +1197,8 @@ patternProperties: > description: Summit microelectronics > "^sunchip,.*": > description: Shenzhen Sunchip Technology Co., Ltd > + "^sundance,.*": > + description: Sundance DSP Inc. > "^sunplus,.*": > description: Sunplus Technology Co., Ltd. > "^SUNW,.*": Best regards, Krzysztof
On 01/05/2022 09:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 30/04/2022 15:09, Conor Dooley wrote: >> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >> >> Sundance DSP Inc. (https://www.sundancedsp.com/) is a supplier of >> high-performance DSP and FPGA processor boards and I/O modules. >> >> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <mail@conchuod.ie> > > If your @microchip.com email still works, then there is no need to > double-sign it. At the end you are still the same person... unless > you're not. :) > > This applies to your other patches as well. I thought that the last SoB had to match the email it was sent from? If that's not the case, my bad. The @microchip email still works, but it would've meant waiting til Tuesday to resend.
On 01/05/2022 12:39, Conor Dooley wrote: > On 01/05/2022 09:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 30/04/2022 15:09, Conor Dooley wrote: >>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >>> >>> Sundance DSP Inc. (https://www.sundancedsp.com/) is a supplier of >>> high-performance DSP and FPGA processor boards and I/O modules. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <mail@conchuod.ie> >> >> If your @microchip.com email still works, then there is no need to >> double-sign it. At the end you are still the same person... unless >> you're not. :) >> >> This applies to your other patches as well. > > I thought that the last SoB had to match the email it was sent from? > If that's not the case, my bad. The @microchip email still works, but > it would've meant waiting til Tuesday to resend. The "From" address must match the SoB address. The person, rather than the email, sending the patch should be the last SoB. I almost do not recall cases where two SoBs were added in such flow like yours. Best regards, Krzysztof
On 01/05/2022 11:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 01/05/2022 12:39, Conor Dooley wrote: >> On 01/05/2022 09:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 30/04/2022 15:09, Conor Dooley wrote: >>>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >>>> >>>> Sundance DSP Inc. (https://www.sundancedsp.com/) is a supplier of >>>> high-performance DSP and FPGA processor boards and I/O modules. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >>>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <mail@conchuod.ie> >>> >>> If your @microchip.com email still works, then there is no need to >>> double-sign it. At the end you are still the same person... unless >>> you're not. :) >>> >>> This applies to your other patches as well. >> >> I thought that the last SoB had to match the email it was sent from? >> If that's not the case, my bad. The @microchip email still works, but >> it would've meant waiting til Tuesday to resend. > > The "From" address must match the SoB address. The person, rather than > the email, sending the patch should be the last SoB. I almost do not > recall cases where two SoBs were added in such flow like yours. That makes things easier! Thanks for clearing that up for me, must have misunderstood. Thanks, Conor.
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml index 01430973ecec..1d47a38c2a2e 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml @@ -1197,6 +1197,8 @@ patternProperties: description: Summit microelectronics "^sunchip,.*": description: Shenzhen Sunchip Technology Co., Ltd + "^sundance,.*": + description: Sundance DSP Inc. "^sunplus,.*": description: Sunplus Technology Co., Ltd. "^SUNW,.*":