Message ID | 20220404221039.1272245-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | s390/vfio-ap: dynamic configuration support | expand |
PING!! On 4/4/22 6:10 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote: > The current design for AP pass-through does not support making dynamic > changes to the AP matrix of a running guest resulting in a few > deficiencies this patch series is intended to mitigate: > > 1. Adapters, domains and control domains can not be added to or removed > from a running guest. In order to modify a guest's AP configuration, > the guest must be terminated; only then can AP resources be assigned > to or unassigned from the guest's matrix mdev. The new AP > configuration becomes available to the guest when it is subsequently > restarted. > > 2. The AP bus's /sys/bus/ap/apmask and /sys/bus/ap/aqmask interfaces can > be modified by a root user without any restrictions. A change to > either mask can result in AP queue devices being unbound from the > vfio_ap device driver and bound to a zcrypt device driver even if a > guest is using the queues, thus giving the host access to the guest's > private crypto data and vice versa. > > 3. The APQNs derived from the Cartesian product of the APIDs of the > adapters and APQIs of the domains assigned to a matrix mdev must > reference an AP queue device bound to the vfio_ap device driver. The > AP architecture allows assignment of AP resources that are not > available to the system, so this artificial restriction is not > compliant with the architecture. > > 4. The AP configuration profile can be dynamically changed for the linux > host after a KVM guest is started. For example, a new domain can be > dynamically added to the configuration profile via the SE or an HMC > connected to a DPM enabled lpar. Likewise, AP adapters can be > dynamically configured (online state) and deconfigured (standby state) > using the SE, an SCLP command or an HMC connected to a DPM enabled > lpar. This can result in inadvertent sharing of AP queues between the > guest and host. > > 5. A root user can manually unbind an AP queue device representing a > queue in use by a KVM guest via the vfio_ap device driver's sysfs > unbind attribute. In this case, the guest will be using a queue that > is not bound to the driver which violates the device model. > > This patch series introduces the following changes to the current design > to alleviate the shortcomings described above as well as to implement > more of the AP architecture: > > 1. A root user will be prevented from making edits to the AP bus's > /sys/bus/ap/apmask or /sys/bus/ap/aqmask if the change would transfer > ownership of an APQN from the vfio_ap device driver to a zcrypt driver > while the APQN is assigned to a matrix mdev. > > 2. Allow a root user to hot plug/unplug AP adapters, domains and control > domains for a KVM guest using the matrix mdev via its sysfs > assign/unassign attributes. > > 4. Allow assignment of an AP adapter or domain to a matrix mdev even if > it results in assignment of an APQN that does not reference an AP > queue device bound to the vfio_ap device driver, as long as the APQN > is not reserved for use by the default zcrypt drivers (also known as > over-provisioning of AP resources). Allowing over-provisioning of AP > resources better models the architecture which does not preclude > assigning AP resources that are not yet available in the system. Such > APQNs, however, will not be assigned to the guest using the matrix > mdev; only APQNs referencing AP queue devices bound to the vfio_ap > device driver will actually get assigned to the guest. > > 5. Handle dynamic changes to the AP device model. > > 1. Rationale for changes to AP bus's apmask/aqmask interfaces: > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Due to the extremely sensitive nature of cryptographic data, it is > imperative that great care be taken to ensure that such data is secured. > Allowing a root user, either inadvertently or maliciously, to configure > these masks such that a queue is shared between the host and a guest is > not only avoidable, it is advisable. It was suggested that this scenario > is better handled in user space with management software, but that does > not preclude a malicious administrator from using the sysfs interfaces > to gain access to a guest's crypto data. It was also suggested that this > scenario could be avoided by taking access to the adapter away from the > guest and zeroing out the queues prior to the vfio_ap driver releasing the > device; however, stealing an adapter in use from a guest as a by-product > of an operation is bad and will likely cause problems for the guest > unnecessarily. It was decided that the most effective solution with the > least number of negative side effects is to prevent the situation at the > source. > > 2. Rationale for hot plug/unplug using matrix mdev sysfs interfaces: > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Allowing a user to hot plug/unplug AP resources using the matrix mdev > sysfs interfaces circumvents the need to terminate the guest in order to > modify its AP configuration. Allowing dynamic configuration makes > reconfiguring a guest's AP matrix much less disruptive. > > 3. Rationale for allowing over-provisioning of AP resources: > ----------------------------------------------------------- > Allowing assignment of AP resources to a matrix mdev and ultimately to a > guest better models the AP architecture. The architecture does not > preclude assignment of unavailable AP resources. If a queue subsequently > becomes available while a guest using the matrix mdev to which its APQN > is assigned, the guest will be given access to it. If an APQN > is dynamically unassigned from the underlying host system, it will > automatically become unavailable to the guest. > > Change log v18-v19: > ------------------ > * Changed name of vfio_ap_mdev_hotplug_apcb (vfio_ap_ops.c) to > vfio_ap_mdev_update_guest_apcb > (Suggested by Jason: review of patch 10/18) > > * Replace call to kvm_arch_crypto_set_masks in vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm with > call to vfio_ap_mdev_update_guest_apcb > (Suggested by Jason: review of patch 10/18) > > * Moved changes related to new locking scheme into its own set of > patches (Suggested by Jason: review of patch 10/18) > > * Consolidated some of the lock acquisition code into macros called by the > functions that update a KVM guest's APCB. > > * Refactored vfio_ap_mdev_unlink_adapter() and > vfio_ap_unlink_apqn_fr_mdev() functions according to Jason's sample > code. (Suggested by Jason: review of patch 12/18) > > * Require callers of the AP bus ap_apqn_in_matrix_owned_by_def_drv and > ap_owned_by_def_drv - only called by the vfio_ap driver - to take the > ap_perms_mutex lock. The adapter/domain assignment interfaces will take > the ap_perms_mutex lock prior to other required locks to maintain a > proper locking order and avoid circular locking dependencies when the > vfio_ap device driver's in_use callback is invoked simultaneously with > the adapter/domain assignment interfaces. (Suggested by Jason) > > * Refactored patch 15/18: handle config changed and scan complete > notification (Suggested by Jason) > > * Refactored filtering of the matrix to reduce redundant processing of > APQNs: > - Inspect only the new APIDs or APQIs assigned to the matrix mdev or > added to the host's AP configuration > - Automatically removing APIDs or APQIs unassigned from the matrix mdev > or removed from the host's AP configuration. > (Suggested by Halil) > > Tony Krowiak (20): > s390/vfio-ap: use new AP bus interface to search for queue devices > s390/vfio-ap: move probe and remove callbacks to vfio_ap_ops.c > s390/vfio-ap: manage link between queue struct and matrix mdev > s390/vfio-ap: introduce shadow APCB > s390/vfio-ap: refresh guest's APCB by filtering AP resources assigned > to mdev > s390/vfio-ap: allow assignment of unavailable AP queues to mdev device > s390/vfio-ap: rename matrix_dev->lock mutex to matrix_dev->mdevs_lock > s390/vfio-ap: introduce new mutex to control access to the KVM pointer > s390/vfio-ap: use proper locking order when setting/clearing KVM > pointer > s390/vfio-ap: prepare for dynamic update of guest's APCB on > assign/unassign > s390/vfio-ap: prepare for dynamic update of guest's APCB on queue > probe/remove > s390/vfio-ap: allow hot plug/unplug of AP devices when > assigned/unassigned > s390/vfio-ap: hot plug/unplug of AP devices when probed/removed > s390/vfio-ap: reset queues after adapter/domain unassignment > s390/vfio-ap: implement in-use callback for vfio_ap driver > s390/vfio-ap: sysfs attribute to display the guest's matrix > s390/vfio-ap: handle config changed and scan complete notification > s390/vfio-ap: update docs to include dynamic config support > s390/Docs: new doc describing lock usage by the vfio_ap device driver > MAINTAINERS: pick up all vfio_ap docs for VFIO AP maintainers > > Documentation/s390/vfio-ap-locking.rst | 389 +++++++ > Documentation/s390/vfio-ap.rst | 492 ++++++--- > MAINTAINERS | 6 +- > drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c | 31 +- > drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c | 69 +- > drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 1321 ++++++++++++++++++------ > drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h | 47 +- > 7 files changed, 1820 insertions(+), 535 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/s390/vfio-ap-locking.rst >
Hello, anybody home? On 4/4/22 6:10 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote: > The current design for AP pass-through does not support making dynamic > changes to the AP matrix of a running guest resulting in a few > deficiencies this patch series is intended to mitigate: > > 1. Adapters, domains and control domains can not be added to or removed > from a running guest. In order to modify a guest's AP configuration, > the guest must be terminated; only then can AP resources be assigned > to or unassigned from the guest's matrix mdev. The new AP > configuration becomes available to the guest when it is subsequently > restarted. > > 2. The AP bus's /sys/bus/ap/apmask and /sys/bus/ap/aqmask interfaces can > be modified by a root user without any restrictions. A change to > either mask can result in AP queue devices being unbound from the > vfio_ap device driver and bound to a zcrypt device driver even if a > guest is using the queues, thus giving the host access to the guest's > private crypto data and vice versa. > > 3. The APQNs derived from the Cartesian product of the APIDs of the > adapters and APQIs of the domains assigned to a matrix mdev must > reference an AP queue device bound to the vfio_ap device driver. The > AP architecture allows assignment of AP resources that are not > available to the system, so this artificial restriction is not > compliant with the architecture. > > 4. The AP configuration profile can be dynamically changed for the linux > host after a KVM guest is started. For example, a new domain can be > dynamically added to the configuration profile via the SE or an HMC > connected to a DPM enabled lpar. Likewise, AP adapters can be > dynamically configured (online state) and deconfigured (standby state) > using the SE, an SCLP command or an HMC connected to a DPM enabled > lpar. This can result in inadvertent sharing of AP queues between the > guest and host. > > 5. A root user can manually unbind an AP queue device representing a > queue in use by a KVM guest via the vfio_ap device driver's sysfs > unbind attribute. In this case, the guest will be using a queue that > is not bound to the driver which violates the device model. > > This patch series introduces the following changes to the current design > to alleviate the shortcomings described above as well as to implement > more of the AP architecture: > > 1. A root user will be prevented from making edits to the AP bus's > /sys/bus/ap/apmask or /sys/bus/ap/aqmask if the change would transfer > ownership of an APQN from the vfio_ap device driver to a zcrypt driver > while the APQN is assigned to a matrix mdev. > > 2. Allow a root user to hot plug/unplug AP adapters, domains and control > domains for a KVM guest using the matrix mdev via its sysfs > assign/unassign attributes. > > 4. Allow assignment of an AP adapter or domain to a matrix mdev even if > it results in assignment of an APQN that does not reference an AP > queue device bound to the vfio_ap device driver, as long as the APQN > is not reserved for use by the default zcrypt drivers (also known as > over-provisioning of AP resources). Allowing over-provisioning of AP > resources better models the architecture which does not preclude > assigning AP resources that are not yet available in the system. Such > APQNs, however, will not be assigned to the guest using the matrix > mdev; only APQNs referencing AP queue devices bound to the vfio_ap > device driver will actually get assigned to the guest. > > 5. Handle dynamic changes to the AP device model. > > 1. Rationale for changes to AP bus's apmask/aqmask interfaces: > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Due to the extremely sensitive nature of cryptographic data, it is > imperative that great care be taken to ensure that such data is secured. > Allowing a root user, either inadvertently or maliciously, to configure > these masks such that a queue is shared between the host and a guest is > not only avoidable, it is advisable. It was suggested that this scenario > is better handled in user space with management software, but that does > not preclude a malicious administrator from using the sysfs interfaces > to gain access to a guest's crypto data. It was also suggested that this > scenario could be avoided by taking access to the adapter away from the > guest and zeroing out the queues prior to the vfio_ap driver releasing the > device; however, stealing an adapter in use from a guest as a by-product > of an operation is bad and will likely cause problems for the guest > unnecessarily. It was decided that the most effective solution with the > least number of negative side effects is to prevent the situation at the > source. > > 2. Rationale for hot plug/unplug using matrix mdev sysfs interfaces: > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Allowing a user to hot plug/unplug AP resources using the matrix mdev > sysfs interfaces circumvents the need to terminate the guest in order to > modify its AP configuration. Allowing dynamic configuration makes > reconfiguring a guest's AP matrix much less disruptive. > > 3. Rationale for allowing over-provisioning of AP resources: > ----------------------------------------------------------- > Allowing assignment of AP resources to a matrix mdev and ultimately to a > guest better models the AP architecture. The architecture does not > preclude assignment of unavailable AP resources. If a queue subsequently > becomes available while a guest using the matrix mdev to which its APQN > is assigned, the guest will be given access to it. If an APQN > is dynamically unassigned from the underlying host system, it will > automatically become unavailable to the guest. > > Change log v18-v19: > ------------------ > * Changed name of vfio_ap_mdev_hotplug_apcb (vfio_ap_ops.c) to > vfio_ap_mdev_update_guest_apcb > (Suggested by Jason: review of patch 10/18) > > * Replace call to kvm_arch_crypto_set_masks in vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm with > call to vfio_ap_mdev_update_guest_apcb > (Suggested by Jason: review of patch 10/18) > > * Moved changes related to new locking scheme into its own set of > patches (Suggested by Jason: review of patch 10/18) > > * Consolidated some of the lock acquisition code into macros called by the > functions that update a KVM guest's APCB. > > * Refactored vfio_ap_mdev_unlink_adapter() and > vfio_ap_unlink_apqn_fr_mdev() functions according to Jason's sample > code. (Suggested by Jason: review of patch 12/18) > > * Require callers of the AP bus ap_apqn_in_matrix_owned_by_def_drv and > ap_owned_by_def_drv - only called by the vfio_ap driver - to take the > ap_perms_mutex lock. The adapter/domain assignment interfaces will take > the ap_perms_mutex lock prior to other required locks to maintain a > proper locking order and avoid circular locking dependencies when the > vfio_ap device driver's in_use callback is invoked simultaneously with > the adapter/domain assignment interfaces. (Suggested by Jason) > > * Refactored patch 15/18: handle config changed and scan complete > notification (Suggested by Jason) > > * Refactored filtering of the matrix to reduce redundant processing of > APQNs: > - Inspect only the new APIDs or APQIs assigned to the matrix mdev or > added to the host's AP configuration > - Automatically removing APIDs or APQIs unassigned from the matrix mdev > or removed from the host's AP configuration. > (Suggested by Halil) > > Tony Krowiak (20): > s390/vfio-ap: use new AP bus interface to search for queue devices > s390/vfio-ap: move probe and remove callbacks to vfio_ap_ops.c > s390/vfio-ap: manage link between queue struct and matrix mdev > s390/vfio-ap: introduce shadow APCB > s390/vfio-ap: refresh guest's APCB by filtering AP resources assigned > to mdev > s390/vfio-ap: allow assignment of unavailable AP queues to mdev device > s390/vfio-ap: rename matrix_dev->lock mutex to matrix_dev->mdevs_lock > s390/vfio-ap: introduce new mutex to control access to the KVM pointer > s390/vfio-ap: use proper locking order when setting/clearing KVM > pointer > s390/vfio-ap: prepare for dynamic update of guest's APCB on > assign/unassign > s390/vfio-ap: prepare for dynamic update of guest's APCB on queue > probe/remove > s390/vfio-ap: allow hot plug/unplug of AP devices when > assigned/unassigned > s390/vfio-ap: hot plug/unplug of AP devices when probed/removed > s390/vfio-ap: reset queues after adapter/domain unassignment > s390/vfio-ap: implement in-use callback for vfio_ap driver > s390/vfio-ap: sysfs attribute to display the guest's matrix > s390/vfio-ap: handle config changed and scan complete notification > s390/vfio-ap: update docs to include dynamic config support > s390/Docs: new doc describing lock usage by the vfio_ap device driver > MAINTAINERS: pick up all vfio_ap docs for VFIO AP maintainers > > Documentation/s390/vfio-ap-locking.rst | 389 +++++++ > Documentation/s390/vfio-ap.rst | 492 ++++++--- > MAINTAINERS | 6 +- > drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c | 31 +- > drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c | 69 +- > drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 1321 ++++++++++++++++++------ > drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h | 47 +- > 7 files changed, 1820 insertions(+), 535 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/s390/vfio-ap-locking.rst >
PING On 4/4/22 6:10 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote: > The current design for AP pass-through does not support making dynamic > changes to the AP matrix of a running guest resulting in a few > deficiencies this patch series is intended to mitigate: > > 1. Adapters, domains and control domains can not be added to or removed > from a running guest. In order to modify a guest's AP configuration, > the guest must be terminated; only then can AP resources be assigned > to or unassigned from the guest's matrix mdev. The new AP > configuration becomes available to the guest when it is subsequently > restarted. > > 2. The AP bus's /sys/bus/ap/apmask and /sys/bus/ap/aqmask interfaces can > be modified by a root user without any restrictions. A change to > either mask can result in AP queue devices being unbound from the > vfio_ap device driver and bound to a zcrypt device driver even if a > guest is using the queues, thus giving the host access to the guest's > private crypto data and vice versa. > > 3. The APQNs derived from the Cartesian product of the APIDs of the > adapters and APQIs of the domains assigned to a matrix mdev must > reference an AP queue device bound to the vfio_ap device driver. The > AP architecture allows assignment of AP resources that are not > available to the system, so this artificial restriction is not > compliant with the architecture. > > 4. The AP configuration profile can be dynamically changed for the linux > host after a KVM guest is started. For example, a new domain can be > dynamically added to the configuration profile via the SE or an HMC > connected to a DPM enabled lpar. Likewise, AP adapters can be > dynamically configured (online state) and deconfigured (standby state) > using the SE, an SCLP command or an HMC connected to a DPM enabled > lpar. This can result in inadvertent sharing of AP queues between the > guest and host. > > 5. A root user can manually unbind an AP queue device representing a > queue in use by a KVM guest via the vfio_ap device driver's sysfs > unbind attribute. In this case, the guest will be using a queue that > is not bound to the driver which violates the device model. > > This patch series introduces the following changes to the current design > to alleviate the shortcomings described above as well as to implement > more of the AP architecture: > > 1. A root user will be prevented from making edits to the AP bus's > /sys/bus/ap/apmask or /sys/bus/ap/aqmask if the change would transfer > ownership of an APQN from the vfio_ap device driver to a zcrypt driver > while the APQN is assigned to a matrix mdev. > > 2. Allow a root user to hot plug/unplug AP adapters, domains and control > domains for a KVM guest using the matrix mdev via its sysfs > assign/unassign attributes. > > 4. Allow assignment of an AP adapter or domain to a matrix mdev even if > it results in assignment of an APQN that does not reference an AP > queue device bound to the vfio_ap device driver, as long as the APQN > is not reserved for use by the default zcrypt drivers (also known as > over-provisioning of AP resources). Allowing over-provisioning of AP > resources better models the architecture which does not preclude > assigning AP resources that are not yet available in the system. Such > APQNs, however, will not be assigned to the guest using the matrix > mdev; only APQNs referencing AP queue devices bound to the vfio_ap > device driver will actually get assigned to the guest. > > 5. Handle dynamic changes to the AP device model. > > 1. Rationale for changes to AP bus's apmask/aqmask interfaces: > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Due to the extremely sensitive nature of cryptographic data, it is > imperative that great care be taken to ensure that such data is secured. > Allowing a root user, either inadvertently or maliciously, to configure > these masks such that a queue is shared between the host and a guest is > not only avoidable, it is advisable. It was suggested that this scenario > is better handled in user space with management software, but that does > not preclude a malicious administrator from using the sysfs interfaces > to gain access to a guest's crypto data. It was also suggested that this > scenario could be avoided by taking access to the adapter away from the > guest and zeroing out the queues prior to the vfio_ap driver releasing the > device; however, stealing an adapter in use from a guest as a by-product > of an operation is bad and will likely cause problems for the guest > unnecessarily. It was decided that the most effective solution with the > least number of negative side effects is to prevent the situation at the > source. > > 2. Rationale for hot plug/unplug using matrix mdev sysfs interfaces: > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Allowing a user to hot plug/unplug AP resources using the matrix mdev > sysfs interfaces circumvents the need to terminate the guest in order to > modify its AP configuration. Allowing dynamic configuration makes > reconfiguring a guest's AP matrix much less disruptive. > > 3. Rationale for allowing over-provisioning of AP resources: > ----------------------------------------------------------- > Allowing assignment of AP resources to a matrix mdev and ultimately to a > guest better models the AP architecture. The architecture does not > preclude assignment of unavailable AP resources. If a queue subsequently > becomes available while a guest using the matrix mdev to which its APQN > is assigned, the guest will be given access to it. If an APQN > is dynamically unassigned from the underlying host system, it will > automatically become unavailable to the guest. > > Change log v18-v19: > ------------------ > * Changed name of vfio_ap_mdev_hotplug_apcb (vfio_ap_ops.c) to > vfio_ap_mdev_update_guest_apcb > (Suggested by Jason: review of patch 10/18) > > * Replace call to kvm_arch_crypto_set_masks in vfio_ap_mdev_set_kvm with > call to vfio_ap_mdev_update_guest_apcb > (Suggested by Jason: review of patch 10/18) > > * Moved changes related to new locking scheme into its own set of > patches (Suggested by Jason: review of patch 10/18) > > * Consolidated some of the lock acquisition code into macros called by the > functions that update a KVM guest's APCB. > > * Refactored vfio_ap_mdev_unlink_adapter() and > vfio_ap_unlink_apqn_fr_mdev() functions according to Jason's sample > code. (Suggested by Jason: review of patch 12/18) > > * Require callers of the AP bus ap_apqn_in_matrix_owned_by_def_drv and > ap_owned_by_def_drv - only called by the vfio_ap driver - to take the > ap_perms_mutex lock. The adapter/domain assignment interfaces will take > the ap_perms_mutex lock prior to other required locks to maintain a > proper locking order and avoid circular locking dependencies when the > vfio_ap device driver's in_use callback is invoked simultaneously with > the adapter/domain assignment interfaces. (Suggested by Jason) > > * Refactored patch 15/18: handle config changed and scan complete > notification (Suggested by Jason) > > * Refactored filtering of the matrix to reduce redundant processing of > APQNs: > - Inspect only the new APIDs or APQIs assigned to the matrix mdev or > added to the host's AP configuration > - Automatically removing APIDs or APQIs unassigned from the matrix mdev > or removed from the host's AP configuration. > (Suggested by Halil) > > Tony Krowiak (20): > s390/vfio-ap: use new AP bus interface to search for queue devices > s390/vfio-ap: move probe and remove callbacks to vfio_ap_ops.c > s390/vfio-ap: manage link between queue struct and matrix mdev > s390/vfio-ap: introduce shadow APCB > s390/vfio-ap: refresh guest's APCB by filtering AP resources assigned > to mdev > s390/vfio-ap: allow assignment of unavailable AP queues to mdev device > s390/vfio-ap: rename matrix_dev->lock mutex to matrix_dev->mdevs_lock > s390/vfio-ap: introduce new mutex to control access to the KVM pointer > s390/vfio-ap: use proper locking order when setting/clearing KVM > pointer > s390/vfio-ap: prepare for dynamic update of guest's APCB on > assign/unassign > s390/vfio-ap: prepare for dynamic update of guest's APCB on queue > probe/remove > s390/vfio-ap: allow hot plug/unplug of AP devices when > assigned/unassigned > s390/vfio-ap: hot plug/unplug of AP devices when probed/removed > s390/vfio-ap: reset queues after adapter/domain unassignment > s390/vfio-ap: implement in-use callback for vfio_ap driver > s390/vfio-ap: sysfs attribute to display the guest's matrix > s390/vfio-ap: handle config changed and scan complete notification > s390/vfio-ap: update docs to include dynamic config support > s390/Docs: new doc describing lock usage by the vfio_ap device driver > MAINTAINERS: pick up all vfio_ap docs for VFIO AP maintainers > > Documentation/s390/vfio-ap-locking.rst | 389 +++++++ > Documentation/s390/vfio-ap.rst | 492 ++++++--- > MAINTAINERS | 6 +- > drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c | 31 +- > drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_drv.c | 69 +- > drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 1321 ++++++++++++++++++------ > drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_private.h | 47 +- > 7 files changed, 1820 insertions(+), 535 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/s390/vfio-ap-locking.rst >