| Message ID | febcaf8229a33217b4bfb3654d6f0bfe7f55a84d.1651543731.git.lhjeff911@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Delegated to: | Daniel Lezcano |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add thermal control driver for Sunplus SoC | expand |
Hi, Le 03/05/2022 à 04:13, Li-hao Kuo a écrit : > Add thermal driver for Sunplus. > > Signed-off-by: Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > --- > Changes in v8: > - Modify yaml file. > modify the setting compatible > - Change yaml file name. > - Modify driver. > mosdify and simply the nvmem setting and remove valiable > > MAINTAINERS | 6 ++ > drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 10 +++ > drivers/thermal/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 152 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index edc96cd..82143ff 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -18896,6 +18896,12 @@ S: Maintained > F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.yaml > F: drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c > > +SUNPLUS THERMAL DRIVER > +M: Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > +L: linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > +S: Maintained > +F: drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c > + > SUNPLUS UART DRIVER > M: Hammer Hsieh <hammerh0314-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > S: Maintained > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig > index 0e5cc94..595f507 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig > @@ -504,4 +504,14 @@ config KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL > If you say yes here you get support for the FAN controlled > by the Microcontroller found on the Khadas VIM boards. > > +config SUNPLUS_THERMAL > + tristate "Sunplus thermal drivers" > + depends on SOC_SP7021 || COMPILE_TEST > + help > + This the Sunplus SP7021 thermal driver, which supports the primitive > + temperature sensor embedded in Sunplus SP7021 SoC. > + > + If you have a Sunplus SP7021 platform say Y here and enable this option > + to have support for thermal management > + > endif > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Makefile b/drivers/thermal/Makefile > index f0c36a1..38a76f9 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/thermal/Makefile > @@ -61,3 +61,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_UNIPHIER_THERMAL) += uniphier_thermal.o > obj-$(CONFIG_AMLOGIC_THERMAL) += amlogic_thermal.o > obj-$(CONFIG_SPRD_THERMAL) += sprd_thermal.o > obj-$(CONFIG_KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL) += khadas_mcu_fan.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_SUNPLUS_THERMAL) += sunplus_thermal.o > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..d4e22fc > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c > @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > +/* > + * Copyright (c) Sunplus Inc. > + * Author: Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > + */ > + > +#include <linux/bitfield.h> > +#include <linux/clk.h> > +#include <linux/delay.h> > +#include <linux/io.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h> > +#include <linux/reset.h> > +#include <linux/thermal.h> > + > +#define ENABLE_THERMAL BIT(31) > +#define SP_THERMAL_MASK GENMASK(10, 0) > + > +#define TEMP_RATE 608 > +#define TEMP_BASE 3500 > +#define TEMP_OTP_BASE 1518 > + > +#define SP_THERMAL_CTL0_REG 0x0000 > +#define SP_THERMAL_STS0_REG 0x0030 > + > +/* common data structures */ > +struct sp_thermal_data { > + struct thermal_zone_device *pcb_tz; > + void __iomem *regs; > + int *otp_temp0; > +}; > + > +static int sunplus_get_otp_temp_coef(struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data, struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct nvmem_cell *cell; > + ssize_t otp_l; > + > + cell = nvmem_cell_get(dev, "calib"); > + if (IS_ERR(cell)) > + return PTR_ERR(cell); > + > + sp_data->otp_temp0 = nvmem_cell_read(cell, &otp_l); > + nvmem_cell_put(cell); > + > + if (*sp_data->otp_temp0 == 0) > + *sp_data->otp_temp0 = TEMP_OTP_BASE; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* > + * There is a thermal sensor instance for SUNPLUS Soc > + * T_CODE is the ADC of the thermal sensor > + * T_CODE : 11 digits in total > + * When remanufacturing, the 35 degree T_CODE will be read and stored in nvcell. > + * otp_temp0 is the 35 degree T_CODE obtained from nvcell > + * The function will get 35 degree T_CODE for thermal calibration. > + * TEMP_RATE is the SUNPLUS thermal temperature slope. > + */ > + > +static int sp_thermal_get_sensor_temp(void *data, int *temp) > +{ > + struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data = data; > + int t_code; > + > + t_code = readl(sp_data->regs + SP_THERMAL_STS0_REG); > + t_code = FIELD_GET(SP_THERMAL_MASK, t_code); > + *temp = ((*sp_data->otp_temp0 - t_code) * 10000 / TEMP_RATE) + TEMP_BASE; > + *temp *= 10; > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops sp_of_thermal_ops = { > + .get_temp = sp_thermal_get_sensor_temp, > +}; > + > +static int sunplus_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data; > + int ret; > + > + sp_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sp_data), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!sp_data) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + sp_data->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); > + if (IS_ERR(sp_data->regs)) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "resource get fail\n"); > + return PTR_ERR(sp_data->regs); > + } > + > + writel(ENABLE_THERMAL, sp_data->regs + SP_THERMAL_CTL0_REG); > + > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sp_data); > + ret = sunplus_get_otp_temp_coef(sp_data, &pdev->dev); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + sp_data->pcb_tz = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev, > + 0, > + sp_data, &sp_of_thermal_ops); sp_data->pcb_tz is the result of devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register() and devm_ functions usually don't need any clean-up. It is done automagically by the kernel itself. > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sp_data->pcb_tz)) > + return PTR_ERR(sp_data->pcb_tz); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int sunplus_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + > + thermal_zone_device_unregister(sp_data->pcb_tz); But here it is unregistered. 1) I would have expected that no unregister function is needed. 2) Should one be there, based on naming, thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister() would look more consistent. I know nothing about the thermal API, so don't take this comment too seriously. It just look odd to me when I gave it a look. Just my 2c, CJ > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct of_device_id of_sunplus_thermal_ids[] = { > + { .compatible = "sunplus,thermal" }, > + { /* sentinel */ } > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_sunplus_thermal_ids); > + > +static struct platform_driver sunplus_thermal_driver = { > + .probe = sunplus_thermal_probe, > + .remove = sunplus_thermal_remove, > + .driver = { > + .name = "sunplus-thermal", > + .of_match_table = of_sunplus_thermal_ids, > + }, > +}; > +module_platform_driver(sunplus_thermal_driver); > + > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>"); > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Thermal driver for sunplus SoC"); > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
Hi, below, some additional nitpick. CJ Le 03/05/2022 à 04:13, Li-hao Kuo a écrit : > Add thermal driver for Sunplus. > > Signed-off-by: Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > --- > Changes in v8: > - Modify yaml file. > modify the setting compatible > - Change yaml file name. > - Modify driver. > mosdify and simply the nvmem setting and remove valiable > > MAINTAINERS | 6 ++ > drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 10 +++ > drivers/thermal/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 152 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index edc96cd..82143ff 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -18896,6 +18896,12 @@ S: Maintained > F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.yaml > F: drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c > > +SUNPLUS THERMAL DRIVER > +M: Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > +L: linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > +S: Maintained > +F: drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c > + > SUNPLUS UART DRIVER > M: Hammer Hsieh <hammerh0314-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > S: Maintained > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig > index 0e5cc94..595f507 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig > @@ -504,4 +504,14 @@ config KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL > If you say yes here you get support for the FAN controlled > by the Microcontroller found on the Khadas VIM boards. > > +config SUNPLUS_THERMAL > + tristate "Sunplus thermal drivers" > + depends on SOC_SP7021 || COMPILE_TEST > + help > + This the Sunplus SP7021 thermal driver, which supports the primitive Missing word? This *enables* the... ? > + temperature sensor embedded in Sunplus SP7021 SoC. > + > + If you have a Sunplus SP7021 platform say Y here and enable this option > + to have support for thermal management > + > endif > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Makefile b/drivers/thermal/Makefile > index f0c36a1..38a76f9 100644 > --- a/drivers/thermal/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/thermal/Makefile > @@ -61,3 +61,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_UNIPHIER_THERMAL) += uniphier_thermal.o > obj-$(CONFIG_AMLOGIC_THERMAL) += amlogic_thermal.o > obj-$(CONFIG_SPRD_THERMAL) += sprd_thermal.o > obj-$(CONFIG_KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL) += khadas_mcu_fan.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_SUNPLUS_THERMAL) += sunplus_thermal.o > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..d4e22fc > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c > @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > +/* > + * Copyright (c) Sunplus Inc. > + * Author: Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> > + */ > + > +#include <linux/bitfield.h> > +#include <linux/clk.h> > +#include <linux/delay.h> > +#include <linux/io.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> > +#include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h> > +#include <linux/reset.h> > +#include <linux/thermal.h> > + > +#define ENABLE_THERMAL BIT(31) > +#define SP_THERMAL_MASK GENMASK(10, 0) > + > +#define TEMP_RATE 608 > +#define TEMP_BASE 3500 > +#define TEMP_OTP_BASE 1518 > + > +#define SP_THERMAL_CTL0_REG 0x0000 > +#define SP_THERMAL_STS0_REG 0x0030 > + > +/* common data structures */ > +struct sp_thermal_data { > + struct thermal_zone_device *pcb_tz; > + void __iomem *regs; > + int *otp_temp0; > +}; > + > +static int sunplus_get_otp_temp_coef(struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data, struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct nvmem_cell *cell; > + ssize_t otp_l; > + > + cell = nvmem_cell_get(dev, "calib"); > + if (IS_ERR(cell)) > + return PTR_ERR(cell); > + > + sp_data->otp_temp0 = nvmem_cell_read(cell, &otp_l); > + nvmem_cell_put(cell); > + > + if (*sp_data->otp_temp0 == 0) > + *sp_data->otp_temp0 = TEMP_OTP_BASE; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* > + * There is a thermal sensor instance for SUNPLUS Soc I don't know what is the best, but if you want to be consistent, other places are about Sunplus, not SUNPLUS. > + * T_CODE is the ADC of the thermal sensor > + * T_CODE : 11 digits in total > + * When remanufacturing, the 35 degree T_CODE will be read and stored in nvcell. > + * otp_temp0 is the 35 degree T_CODE obtained from nvcell > + * The function will get 35 degree T_CODE for thermal calibration. > + * TEMP_RATE is the SUNPLUS thermal temperature slope. Same here. > + */ > + > +static int sp_thermal_get_sensor_temp(void *data, int *temp) > +{ > + struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data = data; > + int t_code; > + > + t_code = readl(sp_data->regs + SP_THERMAL_STS0_REG); > + t_code = FIELD_GET(SP_THERMAL_MASK, t_code); > + *temp = ((*sp_data->otp_temp0 - t_code) * 10000 / TEMP_RATE) + TEMP_BASE; > + *temp *= 10; > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops sp_of_thermal_ops = { > + .get_temp = sp_thermal_get_sensor_temp, > +}; > + > +static int sunplus_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data; > + int ret; > + > + sp_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sp_data), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!sp_data) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + sp_data->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); > + if (IS_ERR(sp_data->regs)) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "resource get fail\n"); > + return PTR_ERR(sp_data->regs); > + } > + > + writel(ENABLE_THERMAL, sp_data->regs + SP_THERMAL_CTL0_REG); > + > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sp_data); > + ret = sunplus_get_otp_temp_coef(sp_data, &pdev->dev); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + sp_data->pcb_tz = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev, > + 0, > + sp_data, &sp_of_thermal_ops); > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sp_data->pcb_tz)) I don't think that devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register() can return NULL. > + return PTR_ERR(sp_data->pcb_tz); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int sunplus_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > + > + thermal_zone_device_unregister(sp_data->pcb_tz); > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct of_device_id of_sunplus_thermal_ids[] = { > + { .compatible = "sunplus,thermal" }, > + { /* sentinel */ } > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_sunplus_thermal_ids); > + > +static struct platform_driver sunplus_thermal_driver = { > + .probe = sunplus_thermal_probe, > + .remove = sunplus_thermal_remove, > + .driver = { > + .name = "sunplus-thermal", > + .of_match_table = of_sunplus_thermal_ids, > + }, The }, should be aligned on .driver (1 less tabulation) > +}; > +module_platform_driver(sunplus_thermal_driver); > + > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>"); > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Thermal driver for sunplus SoC"); Other places are about Sunplus, not sunplus > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index edc96cd..82143ff 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -18896,6 +18896,12 @@ S: Maintained F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.yaml F: drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c +SUNPLUS THERMAL DRIVER +M: Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911@gmail.com> +L: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org +S: Maintained +F: drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c + SUNPLUS UART DRIVER M: Hammer Hsieh <hammerh0314@gmail.com> S: Maintained diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig index 0e5cc94..595f507 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig @@ -504,4 +504,14 @@ config KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL If you say yes here you get support for the FAN controlled by the Microcontroller found on the Khadas VIM boards. +config SUNPLUS_THERMAL + tristate "Sunplus thermal drivers" + depends on SOC_SP7021 || COMPILE_TEST + help + This the Sunplus SP7021 thermal driver, which supports the primitive + temperature sensor embedded in Sunplus SP7021 SoC. + + If you have a Sunplus SP7021 platform say Y here and enable this option + to have support for thermal management + endif diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Makefile b/drivers/thermal/Makefile index f0c36a1..38a76f9 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/Makefile +++ b/drivers/thermal/Makefile @@ -61,3 +61,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_UNIPHIER_THERMAL) += uniphier_thermal.o obj-$(CONFIG_AMLOGIC_THERMAL) += amlogic_thermal.o obj-$(CONFIG_SPRD_THERMAL) += sprd_thermal.o obj-$(CONFIG_KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL) += khadas_mcu_fan.o +obj-$(CONFIG_SUNPLUS_THERMAL) += sunplus_thermal.o diff --git a/drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d4e22fc --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * Copyright (c) Sunplus Inc. + * Author: Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911@gmail.com> + */ + +#include <linux/bitfield.h> +#include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/reset.h> +#include <linux/thermal.h> + +#define ENABLE_THERMAL BIT(31) +#define SP_THERMAL_MASK GENMASK(10, 0) + +#define TEMP_RATE 608 +#define TEMP_BASE 3500 +#define TEMP_OTP_BASE 1518 + +#define SP_THERMAL_CTL0_REG 0x0000 +#define SP_THERMAL_STS0_REG 0x0030 + +/* common data structures */ +struct sp_thermal_data { + struct thermal_zone_device *pcb_tz; + void __iomem *regs; + int *otp_temp0; +}; + +static int sunplus_get_otp_temp_coef(struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data, struct device *dev) +{ + struct nvmem_cell *cell; + ssize_t otp_l; + + cell = nvmem_cell_get(dev, "calib"); + if (IS_ERR(cell)) + return PTR_ERR(cell); + + sp_data->otp_temp0 = nvmem_cell_read(cell, &otp_l); + nvmem_cell_put(cell); + + if (*sp_data->otp_temp0 == 0) + *sp_data->otp_temp0 = TEMP_OTP_BASE; + + return 0; +} + +/* + * There is a thermal sensor instance for SUNPLUS Soc + * T_CODE is the ADC of the thermal sensor + * T_CODE : 11 digits in total + * When remanufacturing, the 35 degree T_CODE will be read and stored in nvcell. + * otp_temp0 is the 35 degree T_CODE obtained from nvcell + * The function will get 35 degree T_CODE for thermal calibration. + * TEMP_RATE is the SUNPLUS thermal temperature slope. + */ + +static int sp_thermal_get_sensor_temp(void *data, int *temp) +{ + struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data = data; + int t_code; + + t_code = readl(sp_data->regs + SP_THERMAL_STS0_REG); + t_code = FIELD_GET(SP_THERMAL_MASK, t_code); + *temp = ((*sp_data->otp_temp0 - t_code) * 10000 / TEMP_RATE) + TEMP_BASE; + *temp *= 10; + return 0; +} + +static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops sp_of_thermal_ops = { + .get_temp = sp_thermal_get_sensor_temp, +}; + +static int sunplus_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data; + int ret; + + sp_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sp_data), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!sp_data) + return -ENOMEM; + + sp_data->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); + if (IS_ERR(sp_data->regs)) { + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "resource get fail\n"); + return PTR_ERR(sp_data->regs); + } + + writel(ENABLE_THERMAL, sp_data->regs + SP_THERMAL_CTL0_REG); + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sp_data); + ret = sunplus_get_otp_temp_coef(sp_data, &pdev->dev); + if (ret) + return ret; + + sp_data->pcb_tz = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev, + 0, + sp_data, &sp_of_thermal_ops); + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sp_data->pcb_tz)) + return PTR_ERR(sp_data->pcb_tz); + + return ret; +} + +static int sunplus_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + + thermal_zone_device_unregister(sp_data->pcb_tz); + return 0; +} + +static const struct of_device_id of_sunplus_thermal_ids[] = { + { .compatible = "sunplus,thermal" }, + { /* sentinel */ } +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_sunplus_thermal_ids); + +static struct platform_driver sunplus_thermal_driver = { + .probe = sunplus_thermal_probe, + .remove = sunplus_thermal_remove, + .driver = { + .name = "sunplus-thermal", + .of_match_table = of_sunplus_thermal_ids, + }, +}; +module_platform_driver(sunplus_thermal_driver); + +MODULE_AUTHOR("Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911@gmail.com>"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Thermal driver for sunplus SoC"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
Add thermal driver for Sunplus. Signed-off-by: Li-hao Kuo <lhjeff911@gmail.com> --- Changes in v8: - Modify yaml file. modify the setting compatible - Change yaml file name. - Modify driver. mosdify and simply the nvmem setting and remove valiable MAINTAINERS | 6 ++ drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 10 +++ drivers/thermal/Makefile | 1 + drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 152 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c