diff mbox series

[v2,-next] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: Fix build warning without CONFIG_OF

Message ID 20220507021424.12180-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [v2,-next] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: Fix build warning without CONFIG_OF | expand

Commit Message

Yue Haibing May 7, 2022, 2:14 a.m. UTC
sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359.c:1639:32: warning: ‘mt8195_mt6359_max98390_rt5682_card’ defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
 1639 | static struct mt8195_card_data mt8195_mt6359_max98390_rt5682_card = {
      |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359.c:1634:32: warning: ‘mt8195_mt6359_rt1011_rt5682_card’ defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
 1634 | static struct mt8195_card_data mt8195_mt6359_rt1011_rt5682_card = {
      |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359.c:1629:32: warning: ‘mt8195_mt6359_rt1019_rt5682_card’ defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
 1629 | static struct mt8195_card_data mt8195_mt6359_rt1019_rt5682_card = {
      |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Since all users of this driver do need CONFIG_OF anyway, there is no
need to save a few bytes on kernel builds while CONFIG_OF disabled, so
just remove the #ifdef to fix this warning.

Fixes: 86a6b9c9dfff ("ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: add machine support for max98390 and rt5682")
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
---
v2: remove #ifdef block as Arnd suggested
---
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Arnd Bergmann May 7, 2022, 8:42 a.m. UTC | #1
On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 4:14 AM YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359.c:1639:32: warning: ‘mt8195_mt6359_max98390_rt5682_card’ defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
>  1639 | static struct mt8195_card_data mt8195_mt6359_max98390_rt5682_card = {
>       |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359.c:1634:32: warning: ‘mt8195_mt6359_rt1011_rt5682_card’ defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
>  1634 | static struct mt8195_card_data mt8195_mt6359_rt1011_rt5682_card = {
>       |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359.c:1629:32: warning: ‘mt8195_mt6359_rt1019_rt5682_card’ defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
>  1629 | static struct mt8195_card_data mt8195_mt6359_rt1019_rt5682_card = {
>       |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Since all users of this driver do need CONFIG_OF anyway, there is no
> need to save a few bytes on kernel builds while CONFIG_OF disabled, so
> just remove the #ifdef to fix this warning.
>
> Fixes: 86a6b9c9dfff ("ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: add machine support for max98390 and rt5682")
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> ---
> v2: remove #ifdef block as Arnd suggested

Looks good to me,

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Mark Brown May 9, 2022, 11:50 a.m. UTC | #2
On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 10:14:24AM +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
> sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359.c:1639:32: warning: ‘mt8195_mt6359_max98390_rt5682_card’ defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
>  1639 | static struct mt8195_card_data mt8195_mt6359_max98390_rt5682_card = {
>       |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend (it
looks like you have additional patches in your tree, am doesn't know the
base SHA1s?).
Yue Haibing May 9, 2022, 12:11 p.m. UTC | #3
On 2022/5/9 19:50, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 10:14:24AM +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
>> sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359.c:1639:32: warning: ‘mt8195_mt6359_max98390_rt5682_card’ defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
>>  1639 | static struct mt8195_card_data mt8195_mt6359_max98390_rt5682_card = {
>>       |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend (it
> looks like you have additional patches in your tree, am doesn't know the
> base SHA1s?).

Sorry, will rebase on next-20220509 ab
>
Mark Brown May 9, 2022, 6:05 p.m. UTC | #4
On Sat, 7 May 2022 10:14:24 +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
> sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359.c:1639:32: warning: ‘mt8195_mt6359_max98390_rt5682_card’ defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
>  1639 | static struct mt8195_card_data mt8195_mt6359_max98390_rt5682_card = {
>       |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359.c:1634:32: warning: ‘mt8195_mt6359_rt1011_rt5682_card’ defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
>  1634 | static struct mt8195_card_data mt8195_mt6359_rt1011_rt5682_card = {
>       |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359.c:1629:32: warning: ‘mt8195_mt6359_rt1019_rt5682_card’ defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
>  1629 | static struct mt8195_card_data mt8195_mt6359_rt1019_rt5682_card = {
>       |                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: mediatek: mt8195: Fix build warning without CONFIG_OF
      commit: 0e63a2be5651e2b34e5c2505992e58be0e9c4bb1

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359.c
index f90675f14d60..54a00b0699b1 100644
--- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359.c
+++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8195/mt8195-mt6359.c
@@ -1626,7 +1626,6 @@  static int mt8195_mt6359_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_OF
 static struct mt8195_card_data mt8195_mt6359_rt1019_rt5682_card = {
 	.name = "mt8195_r1019_5682",
 	.quirk = RT1019_SPEAKER_AMP_PRESENT,
@@ -1657,7 +1656,6 @@  static const struct of_device_id mt8195_mt6359_dt_match[] = {
 	},
 	{},
 };
-#endif
 
 static const struct dev_pm_ops mt8195_mt6359_pm_ops = {
 	.poweroff = snd_soc_poweroff,
@@ -1667,9 +1665,7 @@  static const struct dev_pm_ops mt8195_mt6359_pm_ops = {
 static struct platform_driver mt8195_mt6359_driver = {
 	.driver = {
 		.name = "mt8195_mt6359",
-#ifdef CONFIG_OF
 		.of_match_table = mt8195_mt6359_dt_match,
-#endif
 		.pm = &mt8195_mt6359_pm_ops,
 	},
 	.probe = mt8195_mt6359_dev_probe,