| Message ID | 20220510001807.4132027-8-yosryahmed@google.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | RFC |
| Delegated to: | BPF |
| Headers | show |
| Series | bpf: cgroup hierarchical stats collection | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR | fail | merge-conflict |
| netdev/tree_selection | success | Clearly marked for bpf-next, async |
| netdev/apply | fail | Patch does not apply to bpf-next |
On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 5:18 PM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> wrote: > > From: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> > > There is already a cgroup_get_from_id() in the !CONFIG_CGROUPS case, > let's have a matching cgroup_put() in !CONFIG_CGROUPS too. > > Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> > Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> > --- > include/linux/cgroup.h | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h > index 5408c74d5c44..4f1d8febb9fd 100644 > --- a/include/linux/cgroup.h > +++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h [...] > + > +static inline struct cgroup *cgroup_put(void) > +{} Sorry Yosry, the return type and parameter type are mixed up. I will fix it and send you an updated version.
diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h index 5408c74d5c44..4f1d8febb9fd 100644 --- a/include/linux/cgroup.h +++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h @@ -759,6 +759,9 @@ static inline struct cgroup *cgroup_get_from_id(u64 id) { return NULL; } + +static inline struct cgroup *cgroup_put(void) +{} #endif /* !CONFIG_CGROUPS */ #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS