Message ID | 20220516124659.69484-2-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | MediaTek PMIC Wrap improvements and cleanups | expand |
On 16/05/2022 14:46, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Function pwrap_wait_for_state() is a function that polls an address > through a helper function, but this is the very same operation that > the readx_poll_timeout macro means to do. > Convert all instances of calling pwrap_wait_for_state() to instead > use the read_poll_timeout macro. > > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> > Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> > Tested-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> > --- > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 60 +++++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > index bf39a64f3ecc..54a5300ab72b 100644 > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c > @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ > #include <linux/regmap.h> > #include <linux/reset.h> > > +#define PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US 10 > +#define PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US 10000 > + > #define PWRAP_MT8135_BRIDGE_IORD_ARB_EN 0x4 > #define PWRAP_MT8135_BRIDGE_WACS3_EN 0x10 > #define PWRAP_MT8135_BRIDGE_INIT_DONE3 0x14 > @@ -1241,27 +1244,14 @@ static bool pwrap_is_fsm_idle_and_sync_idle(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp) > (val & PWRAP_STATE_SYNC_IDLE0); > } > > -static int pwrap_wait_for_state(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, > - bool (*fp)(struct pmic_wrapper *)) > -{ > - unsigned long timeout; > - > - timeout = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(10000); > - > - do { > - if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) > - return fp(wrp) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT; > - if (fp(wrp)) > - return 0; > - } while (1); > -} > - > static int pwrap_read16(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata) > { > + bool tmp; > int ret; > u32 val; > > - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle); > + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp, hm, if we make the cond (tmp > 0) that would help to understand the code. At least I had to think about it for a moment. But I leave it to you if you think it's worth the effort. Regards, Matthias > + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); > if (ret) { > pwrap_leave_fsm_vldclr(wrp); > return ret; > @@ -1273,7 +1263,8 @@ static int pwrap_read16(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata) > val = (adr >> 1) << 16; > pwrap_writel(wrp, val, PWRAP_WACS2_CMD); > > - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_vldclr); > + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_vldclr, wrp, tmp, tmp, > + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); > if (ret) > return ret; > > @@ -1290,11 +1281,14 @@ static int pwrap_read16(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata) > > static int pwrap_read32(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata) > { > + bool tmp; > int ret, msb; > > *rdata = 0; > for (msb = 0; msb < 2; msb++) { > - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle); > + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp, > + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); > + > if (ret) { > pwrap_leave_fsm_vldclr(wrp); > return ret; > @@ -1303,7 +1297,8 @@ static int pwrap_read32(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata) > pwrap_writel(wrp, ((msb << 30) | (adr << 16)), > PWRAP_WACS2_CMD); > > - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_vldclr); > + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_vldclr, wrp, tmp, tmp, > + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); > if (ret) > return ret; > > @@ -1323,9 +1318,11 @@ static int pwrap_read(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata) > > static int pwrap_write16(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 wdata) > { > + bool tmp; > int ret; > > - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle); > + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp, > + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); > if (ret) { > pwrap_leave_fsm_vldclr(wrp); > return ret; > @@ -1344,10 +1341,12 @@ static int pwrap_write16(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 wdata) > > static int pwrap_write32(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 wdata) > { > + bool tmp; > int ret, msb, rdata; > > for (msb = 0; msb < 2; msb++) { > - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle); > + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp, > + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); > if (ret) { > pwrap_leave_fsm_vldclr(wrp); > return ret; > @@ -1388,6 +1387,7 @@ static int pwrap_regmap_write(void *context, u32 adr, u32 wdata) > > static int pwrap_reset_spislave(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp) > { > + bool tmp; > int ret, i; > > pwrap_writel(wrp, 0, PWRAP_HIPRIO_ARB_EN); > @@ -1407,7 +1407,8 @@ static int pwrap_reset_spislave(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp) > pwrap_writel(wrp, wrp->master->spi_w | PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTS, > PWRAP_MAN_CMD); > > - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_sync_idle); > + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_sync_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp, > + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); > if (ret) { > dev_err(wrp->dev, "%s fail, ret=%d\n", __func__, ret); > return ret; > @@ -1458,14 +1459,15 @@ static int pwrap_init_sidly(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp) > static int pwrap_init_dual_io(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp) > { > int ret; > + bool tmp; > u32 rdata; > > /* Enable dual IO mode */ > pwrap_write(wrp, wrp->slave->dew_regs[PWRAP_DEW_DIO_EN], 1); > > /* Check IDLE & INIT_DONE in advance */ > - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, > - pwrap_is_fsm_idle_and_sync_idle); > + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_idle_and_sync_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp, > + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); > if (ret) { > dev_err(wrp->dev, "%s fail, ret=%d\n", __func__, ret); > return ret; > @@ -1570,6 +1572,7 @@ static bool pwrap_is_pmic_cipher_ready(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp) > static int pwrap_init_cipher(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp) > { > int ret; > + bool tmp; > u32 rdata = 0; > > pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x1, PWRAP_CIPHER_SWRST); > @@ -1624,14 +1627,16 @@ static int pwrap_init_cipher(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp) > } > > /* wait for cipher data ready@AP */ > - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_cipher_ready); > + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_cipher_ready, wrp, tmp, tmp, > + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); > if (ret) { > dev_err(wrp->dev, "cipher data ready@AP fail, ret=%d\n", ret); > return ret; > } > > /* wait for cipher data ready@PMIC */ > - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_pmic_cipher_ready); > + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_pmic_cipher_ready, wrp, tmp, tmp, > + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); > if (ret) { > dev_err(wrp->dev, > "timeout waiting for cipher data ready@PMIC\n"); > @@ -1640,7 +1645,8 @@ static int pwrap_init_cipher(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp) > > /* wait for cipher mode idle */ > pwrap_write(wrp, wrp->slave->dew_regs[PWRAP_DEW_CIPHER_MODE], 0x1); > - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle_and_sync_idle); > + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_idle_and_sync_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp, > + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); > if (ret) { > dev_err(wrp->dev, "cipher mode idle fail, ret=%d\n", ret); > return ret;
Il 17/05/22 11:25, Matthias Brugger ha scritto: > > > On 16/05/2022 14:46, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >> Function pwrap_wait_for_state() is a function that polls an address >> through a helper function, but this is the very same operation that >> the readx_poll_timeout macro means to do. >> Convert all instances of calling pwrap_wait_for_state() to instead >> use the read_poll_timeout macro. >> >> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> >> Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> >> Tested-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> >> --- >> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 60 +++++++++++++++------------- >> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c >> b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c >> index bf39a64f3ecc..54a5300ab72b 100644 >> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c >> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c >> @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ >> #include <linux/regmap.h> >> #include <linux/reset.h> >> +#define PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US 10 >> +#define PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US 10000 >> + >> #define PWRAP_MT8135_BRIDGE_IORD_ARB_EN 0x4 >> #define PWRAP_MT8135_BRIDGE_WACS3_EN 0x10 >> #define PWRAP_MT8135_BRIDGE_INIT_DONE3 0x14 >> @@ -1241,27 +1244,14 @@ static bool pwrap_is_fsm_idle_and_sync_idle(struct >> pmic_wrapper *wrp) >> (val & PWRAP_STATE_SYNC_IDLE0); >> } >> -static int pwrap_wait_for_state(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, >> - bool (*fp)(struct pmic_wrapper *)) >> -{ >> - unsigned long timeout; >> - >> - timeout = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(10000); >> - >> - do { >> - if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) >> - return fp(wrp) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT; >> - if (fp(wrp)) >> - return 0; >> - } while (1); >> -} >> - >> static int pwrap_read16(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata) >> { >> + bool tmp; >> int ret; >> u32 val; >> - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle); >> + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp, > > hm, if we make the cond (tmp > 0) that would help to understand the code. At least > I had to think about it for a moment. But I leave it to you if you think it's worth > the effort. > I would prefer size over readability in this case... if we do (tmp > 0), it would be incorrect to keep tmp as a `bool`, we would have to set it as an integer var, which is unnecessarily bigger (that's the reason why I wrote it like so!). Another way to increase human readability would be to do (tmp == true), but it looks a bit weird to me, doesn't it? If you disagree about that looking weird, though, I can go with that one, perhaps! Cheers, Angelo
On 17/05/2022 11:41, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Il 17/05/22 11:25, Matthias Brugger ha scritto: >> >> >> On 16/05/2022 14:46, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >>> Function pwrap_wait_for_state() is a function that polls an address >>> through a helper function, but this is the very same operation that >>> the readx_poll_timeout macro means to do. >>> Convert all instances of calling pwrap_wait_for_state() to instead >>> use the read_poll_timeout macro. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno >>> <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> >>> Tested-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 60 +++++++++++++++------------- >>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c >>> b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c >>> index bf39a64f3ecc..54a5300ab72b 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c >>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c >>> @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ >>> #include <linux/regmap.h> >>> #include <linux/reset.h> >>> +#define PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US 10 >>> +#define PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US 10000 >>> + >>> #define PWRAP_MT8135_BRIDGE_IORD_ARB_EN 0x4 >>> #define PWRAP_MT8135_BRIDGE_WACS3_EN 0x10 >>> #define PWRAP_MT8135_BRIDGE_INIT_DONE3 0x14 >>> @@ -1241,27 +1244,14 @@ static bool pwrap_is_fsm_idle_and_sync_idle(struct >>> pmic_wrapper *wrp) >>> (val & PWRAP_STATE_SYNC_IDLE0); >>> } >>> -static int pwrap_wait_for_state(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, >>> - bool (*fp)(struct pmic_wrapper *)) >>> -{ >>> - unsigned long timeout; >>> - >>> - timeout = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(10000); >>> - >>> - do { >>> - if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) >>> - return fp(wrp) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT; >>> - if (fp(wrp)) >>> - return 0; >>> - } while (1); >>> -} >>> - >>> static int pwrap_read16(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata) >>> { >>> + bool tmp; >>> int ret; >>> u32 val; >>> - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle); >>> + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp, >> >> hm, if we make the cond (tmp > 0) that would help to understand the code. At >> least I had to think about it for a moment. But I leave it to you if you think >> it's worth the effort. >> > > I would prefer size over readability in this case... if we do (tmp > 0), it would > be incorrect to keep tmp as a `bool`, we would have to set it as an integer var, > which is unnecessarily bigger (that's the reason why I wrote it like so!). > > Another way to increase human readability would be to do (tmp == true), but it > looks a bit weird to me, doesn't it? > If you disagree about that looking weird, though, I can go with that one, perhaps! > You are right, just leave it as it is. Regards, Matthias
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c index bf39a64f3ecc..54a5300ab72b 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ #include <linux/regmap.h> #include <linux/reset.h> +#define PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US 10 +#define PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US 10000 + #define PWRAP_MT8135_BRIDGE_IORD_ARB_EN 0x4 #define PWRAP_MT8135_BRIDGE_WACS3_EN 0x10 #define PWRAP_MT8135_BRIDGE_INIT_DONE3 0x14 @@ -1241,27 +1244,14 @@ static bool pwrap_is_fsm_idle_and_sync_idle(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp) (val & PWRAP_STATE_SYNC_IDLE0); } -static int pwrap_wait_for_state(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, - bool (*fp)(struct pmic_wrapper *)) -{ - unsigned long timeout; - - timeout = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(10000); - - do { - if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) - return fp(wrp) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT; - if (fp(wrp)) - return 0; - } while (1); -} - static int pwrap_read16(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata) { + bool tmp; int ret; u32 val; - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle); + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp, + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); if (ret) { pwrap_leave_fsm_vldclr(wrp); return ret; @@ -1273,7 +1263,8 @@ static int pwrap_read16(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata) val = (adr >> 1) << 16; pwrap_writel(wrp, val, PWRAP_WACS2_CMD); - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_vldclr); + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_vldclr, wrp, tmp, tmp, + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); if (ret) return ret; @@ -1290,11 +1281,14 @@ static int pwrap_read16(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata) static int pwrap_read32(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata) { + bool tmp; int ret, msb; *rdata = 0; for (msb = 0; msb < 2; msb++) { - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle); + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp, + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); + if (ret) { pwrap_leave_fsm_vldclr(wrp); return ret; @@ -1303,7 +1297,8 @@ static int pwrap_read32(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata) pwrap_writel(wrp, ((msb << 30) | (adr << 16)), PWRAP_WACS2_CMD); - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_vldclr); + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_vldclr, wrp, tmp, tmp, + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); if (ret) return ret; @@ -1323,9 +1318,11 @@ static int pwrap_read(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 *rdata) static int pwrap_write16(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 wdata) { + bool tmp; int ret; - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle); + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp, + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); if (ret) { pwrap_leave_fsm_vldclr(wrp); return ret; @@ -1344,10 +1341,12 @@ static int pwrap_write16(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 wdata) static int pwrap_write32(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp, u32 adr, u32 wdata) { + bool tmp; int ret, msb, rdata; for (msb = 0; msb < 2; msb++) { - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle); + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp, + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); if (ret) { pwrap_leave_fsm_vldclr(wrp); return ret; @@ -1388,6 +1387,7 @@ static int pwrap_regmap_write(void *context, u32 adr, u32 wdata) static int pwrap_reset_spislave(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp) { + bool tmp; int ret, i; pwrap_writel(wrp, 0, PWRAP_HIPRIO_ARB_EN); @@ -1407,7 +1407,8 @@ static int pwrap_reset_spislave(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp) pwrap_writel(wrp, wrp->master->spi_w | PWRAP_MAN_CMD_OP_OUTS, PWRAP_MAN_CMD); - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_sync_idle); + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_sync_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp, + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); if (ret) { dev_err(wrp->dev, "%s fail, ret=%d\n", __func__, ret); return ret; @@ -1458,14 +1459,15 @@ static int pwrap_init_sidly(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp) static int pwrap_init_dual_io(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp) { int ret; + bool tmp; u32 rdata; /* Enable dual IO mode */ pwrap_write(wrp, wrp->slave->dew_regs[PWRAP_DEW_DIO_EN], 1); /* Check IDLE & INIT_DONE in advance */ - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, - pwrap_is_fsm_idle_and_sync_idle); + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_idle_and_sync_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp, + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); if (ret) { dev_err(wrp->dev, "%s fail, ret=%d\n", __func__, ret); return ret; @@ -1570,6 +1572,7 @@ static bool pwrap_is_pmic_cipher_ready(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp) static int pwrap_init_cipher(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp) { int ret; + bool tmp; u32 rdata = 0; pwrap_writel(wrp, 0x1, PWRAP_CIPHER_SWRST); @@ -1624,14 +1627,16 @@ static int pwrap_init_cipher(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp) } /* wait for cipher data ready@AP */ - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_cipher_ready); + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_cipher_ready, wrp, tmp, tmp, + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); if (ret) { dev_err(wrp->dev, "cipher data ready@AP fail, ret=%d\n", ret); return ret; } /* wait for cipher data ready@PMIC */ - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_pmic_cipher_ready); + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_pmic_cipher_ready, wrp, tmp, tmp, + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); if (ret) { dev_err(wrp->dev, "timeout waiting for cipher data ready@PMIC\n"); @@ -1640,7 +1645,8 @@ static int pwrap_init_cipher(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp) /* wait for cipher mode idle */ pwrap_write(wrp, wrp->slave->dew_regs[PWRAP_DEW_CIPHER_MODE], 0x1); - ret = pwrap_wait_for_state(wrp, pwrap_is_fsm_idle_and_sync_idle); + ret = readx_poll_timeout(pwrap_is_fsm_idle_and_sync_idle, wrp, tmp, tmp, + PWRAP_POLL_DELAY_US, PWRAP_POLL_TIMEOUT_US); if (ret) { dev_err(wrp->dev, "cipher mode idle fail, ret=%d\n", ret); return ret;