Message ID | 20220518090738.2694556-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [-next] net: wwan: t7xx: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock in t7xx_cldma_gpd_set_next_ptr() | expand |
Hi Yang, On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 10:57, Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> wrote: > > Sometimes t7xx_cldma_gpd_set_next_ptr() is called under spin lock, > so add a parameter in t7xx_cldma_gpd_set_next_ptr() to make if it > use GFP_ATOMIC flag. > > Fixes: 39d439047f1d ("net: wwan: t7xx: Add control DMA interface") > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> > Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> > --- > drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c | 13 ++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c > index 0c52801ed0de..1fa9bb763831 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c > @@ -91,9 +91,12 @@ static void t7xx_cldma_gpd_set_next_ptr(struct cldma_gpd *gpd, dma_addr_t next_p > } > > static int t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(struct cldma_ctrl *md_ctrl, struct cldma_request *req, > - size_t size) > + size_t size, bool is_atomic) Would be simpler to directly pass the gfp_mask as a parameter. > { > - req->skb = __dev_alloc_skb(size, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (is_atomic) > + req->skb = __dev_alloc_skb(size, GFP_ATOMIC); > + else > + req->skb = __dev_alloc_skb(size, GFP_KERNEL); > if (!req->skb) > return -ENOMEM; > > @@ -174,7 +177,7 @@ static int t7xx_cldma_gpd_rx_from_q(struct cldma_queue *queue, int budget, bool > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->ring_lock, flags); > req = queue->rx_refill; > > - ret = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, queue->tr_ring->pkt_size); > + ret = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, queue->tr_ring->pkt_size, false); > if (ret) > return ret; > > @@ -402,7 +405,7 @@ static struct cldma_request *t7xx_alloc_rx_request(struct cldma_ctrl *md_ctrl, s > if (!req->gpd) > goto err_free_req; > > - val = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, pkt_size); > + val = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, pkt_size, false); > if (val) > goto err_free_pool; > > @@ -801,7 +804,7 @@ static int t7xx_cldma_clear_rxq(struct cldma_ctrl *md_ctrl, int qnum) > if (req->skb) > continue; > > - ret = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, rxq->tr_ring->pkt_size); > + ret = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, rxq->tr_ring->pkt_size, true); > if (ret) > break; > > -- > 2.25.1 >
Hi, On 2022/5/18 17:13, Loic Poulain wrote: > Hi Yang, > > On Wed, 18 May 2022 at 10:57, Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> wrote: >> Sometimes t7xx_cldma_gpd_set_next_ptr() is called under spin lock, >> so add a parameter in t7xx_cldma_gpd_set_next_ptr() to make if it >> use GFP_ATOMIC flag. >> >> Fixes: 39d439047f1d ("net: wwan: t7xx: Add control DMA interface") >> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> >> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> >> --- >> drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c | 13 ++++++++----- >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c >> index 0c52801ed0de..1fa9bb763831 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c >> @@ -91,9 +91,12 @@ static void t7xx_cldma_gpd_set_next_ptr(struct cldma_gpd *gpd, dma_addr_t next_p >> } >> >> static int t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(struct cldma_ctrl *md_ctrl, struct cldma_request *req, >> - size_t size) >> + size_t size, bool is_atomic) > Would be simpler to directly pass the gfp_mask as a parameter. Yes, I will send a v2 with this change later. Thanks, Yang > > >> { >> - req->skb = __dev_alloc_skb(size, GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (is_atomic) >> + req->skb = __dev_alloc_skb(size, GFP_ATOMIC); >> + else >> + req->skb = __dev_alloc_skb(size, GFP_KERNEL); >> if (!req->skb) >> return -ENOMEM; >> >> @@ -174,7 +177,7 @@ static int t7xx_cldma_gpd_rx_from_q(struct cldma_queue *queue, int budget, bool >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->ring_lock, flags); >> req = queue->rx_refill; >> >> - ret = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, queue->tr_ring->pkt_size); >> + ret = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, queue->tr_ring->pkt_size, false); >> if (ret) >> return ret; >> >> @@ -402,7 +405,7 @@ static struct cldma_request *t7xx_alloc_rx_request(struct cldma_ctrl *md_ctrl, s >> if (!req->gpd) >> goto err_free_req; >> >> - val = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, pkt_size); >> + val = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, pkt_size, false); >> if (val) >> goto err_free_pool; >> >> @@ -801,7 +804,7 @@ static int t7xx_cldma_clear_rxq(struct cldma_ctrl *md_ctrl, int qnum) >> if (req->skb) >> continue; >> >> - ret = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, rxq->tr_ring->pkt_size); >> + ret = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, rxq->tr_ring->pkt_size, true); >> if (ret) >> break; >> >> -- >> 2.25.1 >> > .
diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c index 0c52801ed0de..1fa9bb763831 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c @@ -91,9 +91,12 @@ static void t7xx_cldma_gpd_set_next_ptr(struct cldma_gpd *gpd, dma_addr_t next_p } static int t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(struct cldma_ctrl *md_ctrl, struct cldma_request *req, - size_t size) + size_t size, bool is_atomic) { - req->skb = __dev_alloc_skb(size, GFP_KERNEL); + if (is_atomic) + req->skb = __dev_alloc_skb(size, GFP_ATOMIC); + else + req->skb = __dev_alloc_skb(size, GFP_KERNEL); if (!req->skb) return -ENOMEM; @@ -174,7 +177,7 @@ static int t7xx_cldma_gpd_rx_from_q(struct cldma_queue *queue, int budget, bool spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->ring_lock, flags); req = queue->rx_refill; - ret = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, queue->tr_ring->pkt_size); + ret = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, queue->tr_ring->pkt_size, false); if (ret) return ret; @@ -402,7 +405,7 @@ static struct cldma_request *t7xx_alloc_rx_request(struct cldma_ctrl *md_ctrl, s if (!req->gpd) goto err_free_req; - val = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, pkt_size); + val = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, pkt_size, false); if (val) goto err_free_pool; @@ -801,7 +804,7 @@ static int t7xx_cldma_clear_rxq(struct cldma_ctrl *md_ctrl, int qnum) if (req->skb) continue; - ret = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, rxq->tr_ring->pkt_size); + ret = t7xx_cldma_alloc_and_map_skb(md_ctrl, req, rxq->tr_ring->pkt_size, true); if (ret) break;
Sometimes t7xx_cldma_gpd_set_next_ptr() is called under spin lock, so add a parameter in t7xx_cldma_gpd_set_next_ptr() to make if it use GFP_ATOMIC flag. Fixes: 39d439047f1d ("net: wwan: t7xx: Add control DMA interface") Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com> --- drivers/net/wwan/t7xx/t7xx_hif_cldma.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)