Message ID | 1652337012-9053-3-git-send-email-xinlei.lee@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Cooperate with DSI RX devices to modify dsi funcs and delay mipi high to cooperate with panel sequence | expand |
Hi, Xinlei: On Thu, 2022-05-12 at 14:30 +0800, xinlei.lee@mediatek.com wrote: > From: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com> > > In order to match the changes of "Use the drm_panel_bridge API", > the poweron/poweroff of dsi is extracted from enable/disable and > defined as new funcs (atomic_pre_enable/atomic_post_disable). > > Fixes: 2dd8075d2185 ("drm/mediatek: mtk_dsi: Use the drm_panel_bridge > API") > > Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com> > Signed-off-by: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.com> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno < > angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> > Reviewed-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++--------- > -- > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c > index f880136cec09..d9a6b928dba8 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c > @@ -691,16 +691,6 @@ static void mtk_dsi_poweroff(struct mtk_dsi > *dsi) > if (--dsi->refcount != 0) > return; > > - /* > - * mtk_dsi_stop() and mtk_dsi_start() is asymmetric, since > - * mtk_dsi_stop() should be called after > mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_disable(), > - * which needs irq for vblank, and mtk_dsi_stop() will disable > irq. > - * mtk_dsi_start() needs to be called in > mtk_output_dsi_enable(), > - * after dsi is fully set. > - */ > - mtk_dsi_stop(dsi); > - > - mtk_dsi_switch_to_cmd_mode(dsi, VM_DONE_INT_FLAG, 500); > mtk_dsi_reset_engine(dsi); > mtk_dsi_lane0_ulp_mode_enter(dsi); > mtk_dsi_clk_ulp_mode_enter(dsi); > @@ -715,17 +705,9 @@ static void mtk_dsi_poweroff(struct mtk_dsi > *dsi) > > static void mtk_output_dsi_enable(struct mtk_dsi *dsi) > { > - int ret; > - > if (dsi->enabled) > return; > > - ret = mtk_dsi_poweron(dsi); > - if (ret < 0) { > - DRM_ERROR("failed to power on dsi\n"); > - return; > - } > - > mtk_dsi_set_mode(dsi); > mtk_dsi_clk_hs_mode(dsi, 1); > > @@ -739,7 +721,16 @@ static void mtk_output_dsi_disable(struct > mtk_dsi *dsi) > if (!dsi->enabled) > return; > > - mtk_dsi_poweroff(dsi); > + /* > + * mtk_dsi_stop() and mtk_dsi_start() is asymmetric, since > + * mtk_dsi_stop() should be called after > mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_disable(), > + * which needs irq for vblank, and mtk_dsi_stop() will disable > irq. > + * mtk_dsi_start() needs to be called in > mtk_output_dsi_enable(), > + * after dsi is fully set. > + */ > + mtk_dsi_stop(dsi); > + > + mtk_dsi_switch_to_cmd_mode(dsi, VM_DONE_INT_FLAG, 500); > > dsi->enabled = false; > } > @@ -776,13 +767,37 @@ static void mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_enable(struct > drm_bridge *bridge, > { > struct mtk_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge); > > + if (dsi->refcount == 0) > + return; This seems not related to pre_enable()/post_disable(). So separate this to another patch. Regards, CK > + > mtk_output_dsi_enable(dsi); > } > > +static void mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge > *bridge, > + struct drm_bridge_state > *old_bridge_state) > +{ > + struct mtk_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge); > + int ret; > + > + ret = mtk_dsi_poweron(dsi); > + if (ret < 0) > + DRM_ERROR("failed to power on dsi\n"); > +} > + > +static void mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge > *bridge, > + struct drm_bridge_state > *old_bridge_state) > +{ > + struct mtk_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge); > + > + mtk_dsi_poweroff(dsi); > +} > + > static const struct drm_bridge_funcs mtk_dsi_bridge_funcs = { > .attach = mtk_dsi_bridge_attach, > .atomic_disable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_disable, > .atomic_enable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_enable, > + .atomic_pre_enable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_pre_enable, > + .atomic_post_disable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_post_disable, > .mode_set = mtk_dsi_bridge_mode_set, > }; >
On Wed, 2022-05-18 at 11:39 +0800, CK Hu wrote: > Hi, Xinlei: > > On Thu, 2022-05-12 at 14:30 +0800, xinlei.lee@mediatek.com wrote: > > From: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com> > > > > In order to match the changes of "Use the drm_panel_bridge API", > > the poweron/poweroff of dsi is extracted from enable/disable and > > defined as new funcs (atomic_pre_enable/atomic_post_disable). > > > > Fixes: 2dd8075d2185 ("drm/mediatek: mtk_dsi: Use the > > drm_panel_bridge > > API") > > > > Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com> > > Signed-off-by: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.com> > > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno < > > angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> > > Reviewed-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++------- > > -- > > -- > > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c > > index f880136cec09..d9a6b928dba8 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c > > @@ -691,16 +691,6 @@ static void mtk_dsi_poweroff(struct mtk_dsi > > *dsi) > > if (--dsi->refcount != 0) > > return; > > > > - /* > > - * mtk_dsi_stop() and mtk_dsi_start() is asymmetric, since > > - * mtk_dsi_stop() should be called after > > mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_disable(), > > - * which needs irq for vblank, and mtk_dsi_stop() will disable > > irq. > > - * mtk_dsi_start() needs to be called in > > mtk_output_dsi_enable(), > > - * after dsi is fully set. > > - */ > > - mtk_dsi_stop(dsi); > > - > > - mtk_dsi_switch_to_cmd_mode(dsi, VM_DONE_INT_FLAG, 500); > > mtk_dsi_reset_engine(dsi); > > mtk_dsi_lane0_ulp_mode_enter(dsi); > > mtk_dsi_clk_ulp_mode_enter(dsi); > > @@ -715,17 +705,9 @@ static void mtk_dsi_poweroff(struct mtk_dsi > > *dsi) > > > > static void mtk_output_dsi_enable(struct mtk_dsi *dsi) > > { > > - int ret; > > - > > if (dsi->enabled) > > return; > > > > - ret = mtk_dsi_poweron(dsi); > > - if (ret < 0) { > > - DRM_ERROR("failed to power on dsi\n"); > > - return; > > - } > > - > > mtk_dsi_set_mode(dsi); > > mtk_dsi_clk_hs_mode(dsi, 1); > > > > @@ -739,7 +721,16 @@ static void mtk_output_dsi_disable(struct > > mtk_dsi *dsi) > > if (!dsi->enabled) > > return; > > > > - mtk_dsi_poweroff(dsi); > > + /* > > + * mtk_dsi_stop() and mtk_dsi_start() is asymmetric, since > > + * mtk_dsi_stop() should be called after > > mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_disable(), > > + * which needs irq for vblank, and mtk_dsi_stop() will disable > > irq. > > + * mtk_dsi_start() needs to be called in > > mtk_output_dsi_enable(), > > + * after dsi is fully set. > > + */ > > + mtk_dsi_stop(dsi); > > + > > + mtk_dsi_switch_to_cmd_mode(dsi, VM_DONE_INT_FLAG, 500); > > > > dsi->enabled = false; > > } > > @@ -776,13 +767,37 @@ static void > > mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_enable(struct > > drm_bridge *bridge, > > { > > struct mtk_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge); > > > > + if (dsi->refcount == 0) > > + return; > > This seems not related to pre_enable()/post_disable(). So separate > this > to another patch. > > Regards, > CK > > > + > > mtk_output_dsi_enable(dsi); > > } > > > > +static void mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge > > *bridge, > > + struct drm_bridge_state > > *old_bridge_state) > > +{ > > + struct mtk_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge); > > + int ret; > > + > > + ret = mtk_dsi_poweron(dsi); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + DRM_ERROR("failed to power on dsi\n"); > > +} > > + > > +static void mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge > > *bridge, > > + struct drm_bridge_state > > *old_bridge_state) > > +{ > > + struct mtk_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge); > > + > > + mtk_dsi_poweroff(dsi); > > +} > > + > > static const struct drm_bridge_funcs mtk_dsi_bridge_funcs = { > > .attach = mtk_dsi_bridge_attach, > > .atomic_disable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_disable, > > .atomic_enable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_enable, > > + .atomic_pre_enable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_pre_enable, > > + .atomic_post_disable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_post_disable, > > .mode_set = mtk_dsi_bridge_mode_set, > > }; > > > > Hi CK: Thanks for your review. The modification here is related to pre_enable()/post_disable(). Because in the previous dsi_enable function, dsi_poweron will be executed first and then the dsi register will be operated. But the current modification will move dsi_poweron to the pre_enable function, and the pre_enable is of void type, when dsi_poweron fails, an error log will be printed, but the dsi register will be operated in dsi_enable later , it may cause bus hang. Therefore, dsi_poweron is judged in the dsi_enable function to avoid the above situation. I'll add that description in the comments on the next edition. Best Regards! xinlei
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c index f880136cec09..d9a6b928dba8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c @@ -691,16 +691,6 @@ static void mtk_dsi_poweroff(struct mtk_dsi *dsi) if (--dsi->refcount != 0) return; - /* - * mtk_dsi_stop() and mtk_dsi_start() is asymmetric, since - * mtk_dsi_stop() should be called after mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_disable(), - * which needs irq for vblank, and mtk_dsi_stop() will disable irq. - * mtk_dsi_start() needs to be called in mtk_output_dsi_enable(), - * after dsi is fully set. - */ - mtk_dsi_stop(dsi); - - mtk_dsi_switch_to_cmd_mode(dsi, VM_DONE_INT_FLAG, 500); mtk_dsi_reset_engine(dsi); mtk_dsi_lane0_ulp_mode_enter(dsi); mtk_dsi_clk_ulp_mode_enter(dsi); @@ -715,17 +705,9 @@ static void mtk_dsi_poweroff(struct mtk_dsi *dsi) static void mtk_output_dsi_enable(struct mtk_dsi *dsi) { - int ret; - if (dsi->enabled) return; - ret = mtk_dsi_poweron(dsi); - if (ret < 0) { - DRM_ERROR("failed to power on dsi\n"); - return; - } - mtk_dsi_set_mode(dsi); mtk_dsi_clk_hs_mode(dsi, 1); @@ -739,7 +721,16 @@ static void mtk_output_dsi_disable(struct mtk_dsi *dsi) if (!dsi->enabled) return; - mtk_dsi_poweroff(dsi); + /* + * mtk_dsi_stop() and mtk_dsi_start() is asymmetric, since + * mtk_dsi_stop() should be called after mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_disable(), + * which needs irq for vblank, and mtk_dsi_stop() will disable irq. + * mtk_dsi_start() needs to be called in mtk_output_dsi_enable(), + * after dsi is fully set. + */ + mtk_dsi_stop(dsi); + + mtk_dsi_switch_to_cmd_mode(dsi, VM_DONE_INT_FLAG, 500); dsi->enabled = false; } @@ -776,13 +767,37 @@ static void mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge, { struct mtk_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge); + if (dsi->refcount == 0) + return; + mtk_output_dsi_enable(dsi); } +static void mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge, + struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state) +{ + struct mtk_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge); + int ret; + + ret = mtk_dsi_poweron(dsi); + if (ret < 0) + DRM_ERROR("failed to power on dsi\n"); +} + +static void mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge, + struct drm_bridge_state *old_bridge_state) +{ + struct mtk_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge); + + mtk_dsi_poweroff(dsi); +} + static const struct drm_bridge_funcs mtk_dsi_bridge_funcs = { .attach = mtk_dsi_bridge_attach, .atomic_disable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_disable, .atomic_enable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_enable, + .atomic_pre_enable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_pre_enable, + .atomic_post_disable = mtk_dsi_bridge_atomic_post_disable, .mode_set = mtk_dsi_bridge_mode_set, };