Message ID | 20220531023945.22196-1-dpsmith@apertussolutions.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | xsm: refactor and optimize policy loading | expand |
On 31.05.2022 04:39, Daniel P. Smith wrote: > This series was born out of some cleanup work done while crafting the > hyperlaunch boot modules patch series. The primary purpose of this series was > to stop walking all boot modules when it was not necessary, but the scope > creeped during review. > > Changes in v2: > * changed init_policy to policy_file_required > * split the patch into a series > * corrected casting of policy buffer > * use IS_ENABLED() instead of #ifdef sequence > * moved #ifdef inside of braces for xsm_dt_policy_init() > * addressed lack of error handling of xsm{mb,dt}_init() > > Daniel P. Smith (3): > xsm: only search for a policy file when needed > xsm: consolidate loading the policy buffer > xsm: properly handle error from XSM init The thread consists of 5 follow-ups, including two different 1/3 and two different 2/3. This wants sorting and then perhaps (properly) resending. Jan
On 5/31/22 04:25, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 31.05.2022 04:39, Daniel P. Smith wrote: >> This series was born out of some cleanup work done while crafting the >> hyperlaunch boot modules patch series. The primary purpose of this series was >> to stop walking all boot modules when it was not necessary, but the scope >> creeped during review. >> >> Changes in v2: >> * changed init_policy to policy_file_required >> * split the patch into a series >> * corrected casting of policy buffer >> * use IS_ENABLED() instead of #ifdef sequence >> * moved #ifdef inside of braces for xsm_dt_policy_init() >> * addressed lack of error handling of xsm{mb,dt}_init() >> >> Daniel P. Smith (3): >> xsm: only search for a policy file when needed >> xsm: consolidate loading the policy buffer >> xsm: properly handle error from XSM init > > The thread consists of 5 follow-ups, including two different 1/3 and two > different 2/3. This wants sorting and then perhaps (properly) resending. Yep, looks like I had stray copies from an internal review spin. My apologies. Will resend clean version. v/r, dps