Message ID | 20220510192944.2408515-1-dianders@chromium.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | drm/dp: Make DP AUX bus usage easier; use it on ps8640 | expand |
Hi, On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:30 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote: > > This patch is v3 of the first 2 patches from my RFC series ("drm/dp: Improvements > for DP AUX channel") [1]. I've broken the series in two so we can make > progress on the two halves separately. > > v2 of this series tries to incorporate all the feedback from v1. Hopefully > things are less confusing and simpler this time around. The one thing that got > slightly more confusing is that the done_probing() callback can't return > -EPROBE_DEFER in most cases so we have to adjust drivers a little more. > > v3 takes Dmitry's advice on v2. This now introduces > devm_drm_bridge_add() (in an extra patch), splits some fixups into > their own patch, uses a new name for functions, and requires an > explicit call to done_probing if you have no children. > > The idea for this series came up during the review process of > Sankeerth's series trying to add eDP for Qualcomm SoCs [2]. > > This _doesn't_ attempt to fix the Analogix driver. If this works out, > ideally someone can post a patch up to do that. > > NOTE: I don't have any ps8640 devices that _don't_ use the aux panel > underneath them, so I'm relying on code inspection to make sure I > didn't break those. If someone sees that I did something wrong for > that case then please yell! > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220409023628.2104952-1-dianders@chromium.org/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/1648656179-10347-2-git-send-email-quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com/ > > Changes in v3: > - Adapt to v3 changes in aux bus. > - Don't call done_probing() if there are no children; return -ENODEV. > - Patch ("drm/bridge: Add devm_drm_bridge_add()") new for v3. > - Patch ("drm/dp: Export symbol / kerneldoc fixes...") split for v3. > - Split out EXPORT_SYMBOL and kerneldoc fixes to its own patch. > - Use devm_drm_bridge_add() to simplify. > - Used Dmitry's proposed name: of_dp_aux_populate_bus() > > Changes in v2: > - Change to assume exactly one device. > - Have a probe callback instead of an extra sub device. > - Rewrote atop new method introduced by patch #1. > > Douglas Anderson (4): > drm/dp: Export symbol / kerneldoc fixes for DP AUX bus > drm/dp: Add callbacks to make using DP AUX bus properly easier > drm/bridge: Add devm_drm_bridge_add() > drm/bridge: parade-ps8640: Handle DP AUX more properly > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c | 74 +++++--- > drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_aux_bus.c | 211 +++++++++++++++-------- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c | 23 +++ > include/drm/display/drm_dp_aux_bus.h | 34 +++- > include/drm/drm_bridge.h | 1 + > 5 files changed, 238 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-) I'm hoping to get some review for this series. Anyone? Dmitry: I know you looked at earlier versions of this series. I guess you're happy enough with it now but don't feel enough ownership to give a full Reviewed-by? -Doug
Hi, On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:30 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote: > > This patch is v3 of the first 2 patches from my RFC series ("drm/dp: Improvements > for DP AUX channel") [1]. I've broken the series in two so we can make > progress on the two halves separately. > > v2 of this series tries to incorporate all the feedback from v1. Hopefully > things are less confusing and simpler this time around. The one thing that got > slightly more confusing is that the done_probing() callback can't return > -EPROBE_DEFER in most cases so we have to adjust drivers a little more. > > v3 takes Dmitry's advice on v2. This now introduces > devm_drm_bridge_add() (in an extra patch), splits some fixups into > their own patch, uses a new name for functions, and requires an > explicit call to done_probing if you have no children. > > The idea for this series came up during the review process of > Sankeerth's series trying to add eDP for Qualcomm SoCs [2]. > > This _doesn't_ attempt to fix the Analogix driver. If this works out, > ideally someone can post a patch up to do that. > > NOTE: I don't have any ps8640 devices that _don't_ use the aux panel > underneath them, so I'm relying on code inspection to make sure I > didn't break those. If someone sees that I did something wrong for > that case then please yell! > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220409023628.2104952-1-dianders@chromium.org/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/1648656179-10347-2-git-send-email-quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com/ > > Changes in v3: > - Adapt to v3 changes in aux bus. > - Don't call done_probing() if there are no children; return -ENODEV. > - Patch ("drm/bridge: Add devm_drm_bridge_add()") new for v3. > - Patch ("drm/dp: Export symbol / kerneldoc fixes...") split for v3. > - Split out EXPORT_SYMBOL and kerneldoc fixes to its own patch. > - Use devm_drm_bridge_add() to simplify. > - Used Dmitry's proposed name: of_dp_aux_populate_bus() > > Changes in v2: > - Change to assume exactly one device. > - Have a probe callback instead of an extra sub device. > - Rewrote atop new method introduced by patch #1. > > Douglas Anderson (4): > drm/dp: Export symbol / kerneldoc fixes for DP AUX bus > drm/dp: Add callbacks to make using DP AUX bus properly easier > drm/bridge: Add devm_drm_bridge_add() > drm/bridge: parade-ps8640: Handle DP AUX more properly > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/parade-ps8640.c | 74 +++++--- > drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_aux_bus.c | 211 +++++++++++++++-------- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c | 23 +++ > include/drm/display/drm_dp_aux_bus.h | 34 +++- > include/drm/drm_bridge.h | 1 + > 5 files changed, 238 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-) I'd previously pushed patch #1. Now I've pushed the rest of the patches to drm-misc-next with Dmitry's review: 10e619f1f31c drm/bridge: parade-ps8640: Handle DP AUX more properly 50e156bd8a9d drm/bridge: Add devm_drm_bridge_add() 3800b1710946 drm/dp: Add callbacks to make using DP AUX bus properly easier -Doug