Message ID | 20220601032227.4076670-7-roman.gushchin@linux.dev (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | mm: introduce shrinker debugfs interface | expand |
On Tue, 31 May 2022 20:22:27 -0700 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> wrote: > Add a scan interface which allows to trigger scanning of a particular > shrinker and specify memcg and numa node. It's useful for testing, > debugging and profiling of a specific scan_objects() callback. > Unlike alternatives (creating a real memory pressure and dropping > caches via /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches) this interface allows to interact > with only one shrinker at once. Also, if a shrinker is misreporting > the number of objects (as some do), it doesn't affect scanning. > > .. > > --- a/mm/shrinker_debug.c > +++ b/mm/shrinker_debug.c > @@ -99,6 +99,78 @@ static int shrinker_debugfs_count_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) > } > DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(shrinker_debugfs_count); > > +static int shrinker_debugfs_scan_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) > +{ > + file->private_data = inode->i_private; > + return nonseekable_open(inode, file); > +} > + > +static ssize_t shrinker_debugfs_scan_write(struct file *file, > + const char __user *buf, > + size_t size, loff_t *pos) > +{ > + struct shrinker *shrinker = file->private_data; > + unsigned long nr_to_scan = 0, ino; > + struct shrink_control sc = { > + .gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL, > + }; > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL; > + int nid; > + char kbuf[72]; > + int read_len = size < (sizeof(kbuf) - 1) ? size : (sizeof(kbuf) - 1); size_t or ulong would be more appropriate. > + ssize_t ret; > + > + if (copy_from_user(kbuf, buf, read_len)) > + return -EFAULT; > + kbuf[read_len] = '\0'; > + > + if (sscanf(kbuf, "%lu %d %lu", &ino, &nid, &nr_to_scan) < 2) Was it intentional to permit more than three args? > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (nid < 0 || nid >= nr_node_ids) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (nr_to_scan == 0) > + return size; > + > + if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE) { > + memcg = mem_cgroup_get_from_ino(ino); > + if (!memcg || IS_ERR(memcg)) > + return -ENOENT; > + > + if (!mem_cgroup_online(memcg)) { > + mem_cgroup_put(memcg); > + return -ENOENT; > + } > + } else if (ino != 0) { > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + ret = down_read_killable(&shrinker_rwsem); > + if (ret) { > + mem_cgroup_put(memcg); > + return ret; > + } > + > + sc.nid = nid; > + sc.memcg = memcg; > + sc.nr_to_scan = nr_to_scan; > + sc.nr_scanned = nr_to_scan; > + > + shrinker->scan_objects(shrinker, &sc); > + > + up_read(&shrinker_rwsem); > + mem_cgroup_put(memcg); > + > + return size; > +}
On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 02:23:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 31 May 2022 20:22:27 -0700 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> wrote: > > > Add a scan interface which allows to trigger scanning of a particular > > shrinker and specify memcg and numa node. It's useful for testing, > > debugging and profiling of a specific scan_objects() callback. > > Unlike alternatives (creating a real memory pressure and dropping > > caches via /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches) this interface allows to interact > > with only one shrinker at once. Also, if a shrinker is misreporting > > the number of objects (as some do), it doesn't affect scanning. > > > > .. > > > > --- a/mm/shrinker_debug.c > > +++ b/mm/shrinker_debug.c > > @@ -99,6 +99,78 @@ static int shrinker_debugfs_count_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) > > } > > DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(shrinker_debugfs_count); > > > > +static int shrinker_debugfs_scan_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) > > +{ > > + file->private_data = inode->i_private; > > + return nonseekable_open(inode, file); > > +} > > + > > +static ssize_t shrinker_debugfs_scan_write(struct file *file, > > + const char __user *buf, > > + size_t size, loff_t *pos) > > +{ > > + struct shrinker *shrinker = file->private_data; > > + unsigned long nr_to_scan = 0, ino; > > + struct shrink_control sc = { > > + .gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL, > > + }; > > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL; > > + int nid; > > + char kbuf[72]; > > + int read_len = size < (sizeof(kbuf) - 1) ? size : (sizeof(kbuf) - 1); > > size_t or ulong would be more appropriate. I agree. > > > + ssize_t ret; > > + > > + if (copy_from_user(kbuf, buf, read_len)) > > + return -EFAULT; > > + kbuf[read_len] = '\0'; > > + > > + if (sscanf(kbuf, "%lu %d %lu", &ino, &nid, &nr_to_scan) < 2) > > Was it intentional to permit more than three args? Good catch! No, of course it wasn't intentional. Below is an updated version of this patch. Thank you for taking a look! -- From b8f0b0fd5bcbc907dfedf2609743713ba8093e31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 11:40:36 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v5 6/6] mm: shrinkers: add scan interface for shrinker debugfs Add a scan interface which allows to trigger scanning of a particular shrinker and specify memcg and numa node. It's useful for testing, debugging and profiling of a specific scan_objects() callback. Unlike alternatives (creating a real memory pressure and dropping caches via /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches) this interface allows to interact with only one shrinker at once. Also, if a shrinker is misreporting the number of objects (as some do), it doesn't affect scanning. Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Acked-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> --- .../admin-guide/mm/shrinker_debugfs.rst | 39 +++++++++- mm/shrinker_debug.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/shrinker_debugfs.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/shrinker_debugfs.rst index 1e0e5bdb8179..3887f0b294fe 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/shrinker_debugfs.rst +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/shrinker_debugfs.rst @@ -5,14 +5,16 @@ Shrinker Debugfs Interface ========================== Shrinker debugfs interface provides a visibility into the kernel memory -shrinkers subsystem and allows to get information about individual shrinkers. +shrinkers subsystem and allows to get information about individual shrinkers +and interact with them. For each shrinker registered in the system a directory in **<debugfs>/shrinker/** is created. The directory's name is composed from the shrinker's name and an unique id: e.g. *kfree_rcu-0* or *sb-xfs:vda1-36*. -Each shrinker directory contains the **count** file, which allows to trigger -the *count_objects()* callback for each memcg and numa node (if applicable). +Each shrinker directory contains **count** and **scan** files, which allow to +trigger *count_objects()* and *scan_objects()* callbacks for each memcg and +numa node (if applicable). Usage: ------ @@ -43,7 +45,7 @@ Usage: $ cd sb-btrfs\:vda2-24/ $ ls - count + count scan 3. *Count objects* @@ -102,3 +104,32 @@ Usage: 2877 84 0 293 1 0 735 8 0 + +4. *Scan objects* + + The expected input format:: + + <cgroup inode id> <numa id> <number of objects to scan> + + For a non-memcg-aware shrinker or on a system with no memory + cgrups **0** should be passed as cgroup id. + :: + + $ cd /sys/kernel/debug/shrinker/ + $ cd sb-btrfs\:vda2-24/ + + $ cat count | head -n 5 + 1 212 0 + 21 97 0 + 55 802 5 + 2367 2 0 + 225 13 0 + + $ echo "55 0 200" > scan + + $ cat count | head -n 5 + 1 212 0 + 21 96 0 + 55 752 5 + 2367 2 0 + 225 13 0 diff --git a/mm/shrinker_debug.c b/mm/shrinker_debug.c index 781ecbd3d608..12026472daae 100644 --- a/mm/shrinker_debug.c +++ b/mm/shrinker_debug.c @@ -99,6 +99,78 @@ static int shrinker_debugfs_count_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) } DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(shrinker_debugfs_count); +static int shrinker_debugfs_scan_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) +{ + file->private_data = inode->i_private; + return nonseekable_open(inode, file); +} + +static ssize_t shrinker_debugfs_scan_write(struct file *file, + const char __user *buf, + size_t size, loff_t *pos) +{ + struct shrinker *shrinker = file->private_data; + unsigned long nr_to_scan = 0, ino, read_len; + struct shrink_control sc = { + .gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL, + }; + struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL; + int nid; + char kbuf[72]; + ssize_t ret; + + read_len = size < (sizeof(kbuf) - 1) ? size : (sizeof(kbuf) - 1); + if (copy_from_user(kbuf, buf, read_len)) + return -EFAULT; + kbuf[read_len] = '\0'; + + if (sscanf(kbuf, "%lu %d %lu", &ino, &nid, &nr_to_scan) != 2) + return -EINVAL; + + if (nid < 0 || nid >= nr_node_ids) + return -EINVAL; + + if (nr_to_scan == 0) + return size; + + if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE) { + memcg = mem_cgroup_get_from_ino(ino); + if (!memcg || IS_ERR(memcg)) + return -ENOENT; + + if (!mem_cgroup_online(memcg)) { + mem_cgroup_put(memcg); + return -ENOENT; + } + } else if (ino != 0) { + return -EINVAL; + } + + ret = down_read_killable(&shrinker_rwsem); + if (ret) { + mem_cgroup_put(memcg); + return ret; + } + + sc.nid = nid; + sc.memcg = memcg; + sc.nr_to_scan = nr_to_scan; + sc.nr_scanned = nr_to_scan; + + shrinker->scan_objects(shrinker, &sc); + + up_read(&shrinker_rwsem); + mem_cgroup_put(memcg); + + return size; +} + +static const struct file_operations shrinker_debugfs_scan_fops = { + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .open = shrinker_debugfs_scan_open, + .write = shrinker_debugfs_scan_write, +}; + int shrinker_debugfs_add(struct shrinker *shrinker) { struct dentry *entry; @@ -128,6 +200,8 @@ int shrinker_debugfs_add(struct shrinker *shrinker) debugfs_create_file("count", 0220, entry, shrinker, &shrinker_debugfs_count_fops); + debugfs_create_file("scan", 0440, entry, shrinker, + &shrinker_debugfs_scan_fops); return 0; }
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 17:56:22 -0700 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> wrote: > > > > > + ssize_t ret; > > > + > > > + if (copy_from_user(kbuf, buf, read_len)) > > > + return -EFAULT; > > > + kbuf[read_len] = '\0'; > > > + > > > + if (sscanf(kbuf, "%lu %d %lu", &ino, &nid, &nr_to_scan) < 2) > > > > Was it intentional to permit more than three args? > > Good catch! No, of course it wasn't intentional. > > Below is an updated version of this patch. > > ... > > + if (sscanf(kbuf, "%lu %d %lu", &ino, &nid, &nr_to_scan) != 2) > + return -EINVAL; s/2/3/methinks?
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 11:41:32AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 17:56:22 -0700 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> wrote: > > > > > > > > + ssize_t ret; > > > > + > > > > + if (copy_from_user(kbuf, buf, read_len)) > > > > + return -EFAULT; > > > > + kbuf[read_len] = '\0'; > > > > + > > > > + if (sscanf(kbuf, "%lu %d %lu", &ino, &nid, &nr_to_scan) < 2) > > > > > > Was it intentional to permit more than three args? > > > > Good catch! No, of course it wasn't intentional. > > > > Below is an updated version of this patch. > > > > ... > > > > + if (sscanf(kbuf, "%lu %d %lu", &ino, &nid, &nr_to_scan) != 2) > > + return -EINVAL; > > s/2/3/methinks? > > My bad, of course. Thanks! -- diff --git a/mm/shrinker_debug.c b/mm/shrinker_debug.c index 12026472daae..e5b40c43221d 100644 --- a/mm/shrinker_debug.c +++ b/mm/shrinker_debug.c @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static ssize_t shrinker_debugfs_scan_write(struct file *file, return -EFAULT; kbuf[read_len] = '\0'; - if (sscanf(kbuf, "%lu %d %lu", &ino, &nid, &nr_to_scan) != 2) + if (sscanf(kbuf, "%lu %d %lu", &ino, &nid, &nr_to_scan) != 3) return -EINVAL; if (nid < 0 || nid >= nr_node_ids)
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/shrinker_debugfs.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/shrinker_debugfs.rst index 1e0e5bdb8179..3887f0b294fe 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/shrinker_debugfs.rst +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/mm/shrinker_debugfs.rst @@ -5,14 +5,16 @@ Shrinker Debugfs Interface ========================== Shrinker debugfs interface provides a visibility into the kernel memory -shrinkers subsystem and allows to get information about individual shrinkers. +shrinkers subsystem and allows to get information about individual shrinkers +and interact with them. For each shrinker registered in the system a directory in **<debugfs>/shrinker/** is created. The directory's name is composed from the shrinker's name and an unique id: e.g. *kfree_rcu-0* or *sb-xfs:vda1-36*. -Each shrinker directory contains the **count** file, which allows to trigger -the *count_objects()* callback for each memcg and numa node (if applicable). +Each shrinker directory contains **count** and **scan** files, which allow to +trigger *count_objects()* and *scan_objects()* callbacks for each memcg and +numa node (if applicable). Usage: ------ @@ -43,7 +45,7 @@ Usage: $ cd sb-btrfs\:vda2-24/ $ ls - count + count scan 3. *Count objects* @@ -102,3 +104,32 @@ Usage: 2877 84 0 293 1 0 735 8 0 + +4. *Scan objects* + + The expected input format:: + + <cgroup inode id> <numa id> <number of objects to scan> + + For a non-memcg-aware shrinker or on a system with no memory + cgrups **0** should be passed as cgroup id. + :: + + $ cd /sys/kernel/debug/shrinker/ + $ cd sb-btrfs\:vda2-24/ + + $ cat count | head -n 5 + 1 212 0 + 21 97 0 + 55 802 5 + 2367 2 0 + 225 13 0 + + $ echo "55 0 200" > scan + + $ cat count | head -n 5 + 1 212 0 + 21 96 0 + 55 752 5 + 2367 2 0 + 225 13 0 diff --git a/mm/shrinker_debug.c b/mm/shrinker_debug.c index 781ecbd3d608..e25114e0c41c 100644 --- a/mm/shrinker_debug.c +++ b/mm/shrinker_debug.c @@ -99,6 +99,78 @@ static int shrinker_debugfs_count_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v) } DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(shrinker_debugfs_count); +static int shrinker_debugfs_scan_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) +{ + file->private_data = inode->i_private; + return nonseekable_open(inode, file); +} + +static ssize_t shrinker_debugfs_scan_write(struct file *file, + const char __user *buf, + size_t size, loff_t *pos) +{ + struct shrinker *shrinker = file->private_data; + unsigned long nr_to_scan = 0, ino; + struct shrink_control sc = { + .gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL, + }; + struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL; + int nid; + char kbuf[72]; + int read_len = size < (sizeof(kbuf) - 1) ? size : (sizeof(kbuf) - 1); + ssize_t ret; + + if (copy_from_user(kbuf, buf, read_len)) + return -EFAULT; + kbuf[read_len] = '\0'; + + if (sscanf(kbuf, "%lu %d %lu", &ino, &nid, &nr_to_scan) < 2) + return -EINVAL; + + if (nid < 0 || nid >= nr_node_ids) + return -EINVAL; + + if (nr_to_scan == 0) + return size; + + if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE) { + memcg = mem_cgroup_get_from_ino(ino); + if (!memcg || IS_ERR(memcg)) + return -ENOENT; + + if (!mem_cgroup_online(memcg)) { + mem_cgroup_put(memcg); + return -ENOENT; + } + } else if (ino != 0) { + return -EINVAL; + } + + ret = down_read_killable(&shrinker_rwsem); + if (ret) { + mem_cgroup_put(memcg); + return ret; + } + + sc.nid = nid; + sc.memcg = memcg; + sc.nr_to_scan = nr_to_scan; + sc.nr_scanned = nr_to_scan; + + shrinker->scan_objects(shrinker, &sc); + + up_read(&shrinker_rwsem); + mem_cgroup_put(memcg); + + return size; +} + +static const struct file_operations shrinker_debugfs_scan_fops = { + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .open = shrinker_debugfs_scan_open, + .write = shrinker_debugfs_scan_write, +}; + int shrinker_debugfs_add(struct shrinker *shrinker) { struct dentry *entry; @@ -128,6 +200,8 @@ int shrinker_debugfs_add(struct shrinker *shrinker) debugfs_create_file("count", 0220, entry, shrinker, &shrinker_debugfs_count_fops); + debugfs_create_file("scan", 0440, entry, shrinker, + &shrinker_debugfs_scan_fops); return 0; }