Message ID | 20220520075737.758761-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | clk: provide new devm helpers for prepared and enabled clocks | expand |
Hello, On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 09:57:33AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > after Stephen signaled to accept the idea, this is a rework of v8[1] with > the following changes: > > - Drop the follow up conversions. I will resend them individually per > subsystem once the preconditions from this v9 are in. I only kept one > clk patch that will go in via the clk tree anyhow. I trimmed the Cc: > list accordingly. > > - (trivially) rebased to v5.18-rc1 > > - Introduce a new commit that first improves the documention of > devm_clk_get() and devm_clk_get_optional() before (mostly) > duplicating these for the new functions. > > - Make the new functions use a GPL export. (Note the existing functions > use a plain export, I didn't change that.) > > - Drop a bogus empty line that was cut-n-pasted into several functions. > > Thanks for feedback by Stephen and Jonathan. > > @Russell: Stephen wrote in v8: "I'm largely waiting for Russell to ack > the clk.h change [...]". Would be great if you looked at the series and > tell us your thoughts. That didn't happen :-\ > @Stephen: You asked to add the acks from v8. There were however only > acks for the followup conversions. So no changes here. > (Andy Shevchenko replied to patch 0, but his Reviewed-by: only affected > the patch "iio: Make use of devm_clk_get_enabled()".) Hmm, I somehow expected this series to go into v5.19-rc1, but it didn't :-\. Is there anything still needed from my side? Best regards Uwe
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 01:08:16PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 09:57:33AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > after Stephen signaled to accept the idea, this is a rework of v8[1] with > > the following changes: > > > > - Drop the follow up conversions. I will resend them individually per > > subsystem once the preconditions from this v9 are in. I only kept one > > clk patch that will go in via the clk tree anyhow. I trimmed the Cc: > > list accordingly. > > > > - (trivially) rebased to v5.18-rc1 > > > > - Introduce a new commit that first improves the documention of > > devm_clk_get() and devm_clk_get_optional() before (mostly) > > duplicating these for the new functions. > > > > - Make the new functions use a GPL export. (Note the existing functions > > use a plain export, I didn't change that.) > > > > - Drop a bogus empty line that was cut-n-pasted into several functions. > > > > Thanks for feedback by Stephen and Jonathan. > > > > @Russell: Stephen wrote in v8: "I'm largely waiting for Russell to ack > > the clk.h change [...]". Would be great if you looked at the series and > > tell us your thoughts. > > That didn't happen :-\ Sorry, I missed this patch set. I haven't been reading lakml very much for *all* of May - commitments have meant I haven't had very little time to look at stuff on the mailing list, and due to the volume of email, I don't do "catch up" anymore.