Message ID | 20220601070707.3946847-1-saravanak@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | deferred_probe_timeout logic clean up | expand |
Hi Saravana, On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 12:46 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote: > This series is based on linux-next + these 2 small patches applies on top: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220526034609.480766-1-saravanak@google.com/ > > A lot of the deferred_probe_timeout logic is redundant with > fw_devlink=on. Also, enabling deferred_probe_timeout by default breaks > a few cases. > > This series tries to delete the redundant logic, simplify the frameworks > that use driver_deferred_probe_check_state(), enable > deferred_probe_timeout=10 by default, and fixes the nfsroot failure > case. > > The overall idea of this series is to replace the global behavior of > driver_deferred_probe_check_state() where all devices give up waiting on > supplier at the same time with a more granular behavior: > > 1. Devices with all their suppliers successfully probed by late_initcall > probe as usual and avoid unnecessary deferred probe attempts. > > 2. At or after late_initcall, in cases where boot would break because of > fw_devlink=on being strict about the ordering, we > > a. Temporarily relax the enforcement to probe any unprobed devices > that can probe successfully in the current state of the system. > For example, when we boot with a NFS rootfs and no network device > has probed. > b. Go back to enforcing the ordering for any devices that haven't > probed. > > 3. After deferred probe timeout expires, we permanently give up waiting > on supplier devices without drivers. At this point, whatever devices > can probe without some of their optional suppliers end up probing. > > In the case where module support is disabled, it's fairly > straightforward and all device probes are completed before the initcalls > are done. > > Patches 1 to 3 are fairly straightforward and can probably be applied > right away. > > Patches 4 to 6 are for fixing the NFS rootfs issue and setting the > default deferred_probe_timeout back to 10 seconds when modules are > enabled. > > Patches 7 to 9 are further clean up of the deferred_probe_timeout logic > so that no framework has to know/care about deferred_probe_timeout. > > Yoshihiro/Geert, > > If you can test this patch series and confirm that the NFS root case > works, I'd really appreciate that. Thanks, I gave this a try on various boards I have access to. The results were quite positive. E.g. the compile error I saw on v1 (implicit declation of fw_devlink_unblock_may_probe(), which is no longer used in v2) is gone. However, I'm seeing a weird error when userspace (Debian9 nfsroot) is starting: [ OK ] Started D-Bus System Message Bus. Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 Mem abort info: ESR = 0x0000000096000004 Mem abort info: ESR = 0x0000000096000004 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault SET = 0, FnV = 0 Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault CM = 0, WnR = 0 user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=000000004ec45000 [0000000000000000] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 Data abort info: Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP CPU: 0 PID: 374 Comm: v4l_id Tainted: G W 5.19.0-rc1-arm64-renesas-00799-gc13c3e49e8bd #1660 ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 Hardware name: Renesas Ebisu-4D board based on r8a77990 (DT) pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) CM = 0, WnR = 0 pc : subdev_open+0x8c/0x128 lr : subdev_open+0x78/0x128 sp : ffff80000aadba60 x29: ffff80000aadba60 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff80000aadbc58 x26: 0000000000020000 x25: ffff00000b3aaf00 x24: 0000000000000000 x23: ffff00000c331c00 x22: ffff000009aa61b8 x21: ffff000009aa6000 x20: ffff000008bae3e8 x19: ffff00000c3fe200 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: ffff800076945000 x16: ffff800008004000 x15: 00008cc6bf550c7c x14: 000000000000038f x13: 000000000000001a x12: ffff00007fba8618 x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : ffff800009253954 x8 : ffff00000b3aaf00 x7 : 0000000000000004 x6 : 000000000000001a x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000001 x2 : 0000000100000001 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace: subdev_open+0x8c/0x128 v4l2_open+0xa4/0x120 chrdev_open+0x78/0x178 do_dentry_open+0xfc/0x398 vfs_open+0x28/0x30 path_openat+0x584/0x9c8 do_filp_open+0x80/0x108 do_sys_openat2+0x20c/0x2d8 user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=000000004ec53000 do_sys_open+0x54/0xa0 __arm64_sys_openat+0x20/0x28 invoke_syscall+0x40/0xf8 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xf0/0x110 do_el0_svc+0x20/0x78 el0_svc+0x48/0xd0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb0/0xb8 el0t_64_sync+0x148/0x14c Code: f9405280 f9400400 b40000e0 f9400280 (f9400000) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- This only happens on the Ebisu-4D board (r8a77990-ebisu.dts). I do not see this on the Salvator-X(S) boards. Bisection shows this starts to happen with "[PATCH v2 7/9] driver core: Set fw_devlink.strict=1 by default". Adding more debug info: subdev_open:54: file v4l-subdev1 Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 subdev_open:54: file v4l-subdev2 Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 Matching the subdev using sysfs gives: /sys/devices/platform/soc/e6500000.i2c/i2c-0/0-0070/video4linux/v4l-subdev1 /sys/devices/platform/soc/e6500000.i2c/i2c-0/0-0070/video4linux/v4l-subdev2 The i2c device is the adi,adv7482 at address 0x70. But now I'm lost... Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
-Hideaki -- their email keeps bouncing. On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 11:13 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > Hi Saravana, > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 12:46 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote: > > This series is based on linux-next + these 2 small patches applies on top: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220526034609.480766-1-saravanak@google.com/ > > > > A lot of the deferred_probe_timeout logic is redundant with > > fw_devlink=on. Also, enabling deferred_probe_timeout by default breaks > > a few cases. > > > > This series tries to delete the redundant logic, simplify the frameworks > > that use driver_deferred_probe_check_state(), enable > > deferred_probe_timeout=10 by default, and fixes the nfsroot failure > > case. > > > > The overall idea of this series is to replace the global behavior of > > driver_deferred_probe_check_state() where all devices give up waiting on > > supplier at the same time with a more granular behavior: > > > > 1. Devices with all their suppliers successfully probed by late_initcall > > probe as usual and avoid unnecessary deferred probe attempts. > > > > 2. At or after late_initcall, in cases where boot would break because of > > fw_devlink=on being strict about the ordering, we > > > > a. Temporarily relax the enforcement to probe any unprobed devices > > that can probe successfully in the current state of the system. > > For example, when we boot with a NFS rootfs and no network device > > has probed. > > b. Go back to enforcing the ordering for any devices that haven't > > probed. > > > > 3. After deferred probe timeout expires, we permanently give up waiting > > on supplier devices without drivers. At this point, whatever devices > > can probe without some of their optional suppliers end up probing. > > > > In the case where module support is disabled, it's fairly > > straightforward and all device probes are completed before the initcalls > > are done. > > > > Patches 1 to 3 are fairly straightforward and can probably be applied > > right away. > > > > Patches 4 to 6 are for fixing the NFS rootfs issue and setting the > > default deferred_probe_timeout back to 10 seconds when modules are > > enabled. > > > > Patches 7 to 9 are further clean up of the deferred_probe_timeout logic > > so that no framework has to know/care about deferred_probe_timeout. > > > > Yoshihiro/Geert, > > > > If you can test this patch series and confirm that the NFS root case > > works, I'd really appreciate that. > > Thanks, I gave this a try on various boards I have access to. > The results were quite positive. E.g. the compile error I saw on v1 > (implicit declation of fw_devlink_unblock_may_probe(), which is no longer > used in v2) is gone. Thanks a lot for testing these. > However, I'm seeing a weird error when userspace (Debian9 nfsroot) is > starting: > > [ OK ] Started D-Bus System Message Bus. > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual > address 0000000000000000 > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual > address 0000000000000000 > Mem abort info: > ESR = 0x0000000096000004 > Mem abort info: > ESR = 0x0000000096000004 > EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits > SET = 0, FnV = 0 > EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits > EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 > FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault > SET = 0, FnV = 0 > Data abort info: > ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 > EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 > FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault > CM = 0, WnR = 0 > user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=000000004ec45000 > [0000000000000000] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 > Data abort info: > Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP > CPU: 0 PID: 374 Comm: v4l_id Tainted: G W > 5.19.0-rc1-arm64-renesas-00799-gc13c3e49e8bd #1660 > ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 > Hardware name: Renesas Ebisu-4D board based on r8a77990 (DT) > pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) > CM = 0, WnR = 0 > pc : subdev_open+0x8c/0x128 > lr : subdev_open+0x78/0x128 > sp : ffff80000aadba60 > x29: ffff80000aadba60 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff80000aadbc58 > x26: 0000000000020000 x25: ffff00000b3aaf00 x24: 0000000000000000 > x23: ffff00000c331c00 x22: ffff000009aa61b8 x21: ffff000009aa6000 > x20: ffff000008bae3e8 x19: ffff00000c3fe200 x18: 0000000000000000 > x17: ffff800076945000 x16: ffff800008004000 x15: 00008cc6bf550c7c > x14: 000000000000038f x13: 000000000000001a x12: ffff00007fba8618 > x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : ffff800009253954 > x8 : ffff00000b3aaf00 x7 : 0000000000000004 x6 : 000000000000001a > x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000001 > x2 : 0000000100000001 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 > Call trace: > subdev_open+0x8c/0x128 > v4l2_open+0xa4/0x120 > chrdev_open+0x78/0x178 > do_dentry_open+0xfc/0x398 > vfs_open+0x28/0x30 > path_openat+0x584/0x9c8 > do_filp_open+0x80/0x108 > do_sys_openat2+0x20c/0x2d8 > user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=000000004ec53000 > do_sys_open+0x54/0xa0 > __arm64_sys_openat+0x20/0x28 > invoke_syscall+0x40/0xf8 > el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xf0/0x110 > do_el0_svc+0x20/0x78 > el0_svc+0x48/0xd0 > el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb0/0xb8 > el0t_64_sync+0x148/0x14c > Code: f9405280 f9400400 b40000e0 f9400280 (f9400000) > ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > This only happens on the Ebisu-4D board (r8a77990-ebisu.dts). > I do not see this on the Salvator-X(S) boards. Ok. I don't know much about either of these boards. Are they supposed to be very similar? > Bisection shows this starts to happen with "[PATCH v2 7/9] driver core: > Set fw_devlink.strict=1 by default". So in the series, by this point, the previous patches would have deferred probe timeout set to 10s (it can get extended on new driver additions of course) and once the timer expires suppliers without drivers will no longer block any consumers. The only difference fw_devlink.strict=1 should cause is iommus and dmas dependency being treated as mandatory till the timeout expires. In this instance, do you have iommu drivers and dma drivers compiled in or loaded as modules or not available at all? In all these case, the list of devices that would end up probing eventually should be the same with or without fw_devlink.strict=1. The only difference would be some reordering of probes. So this looks to me like improper error handling/assumption in the driver for this subdev device. I'm guessing one of the suppliers to this subdev has a direct/indirect dependency on iommus and this subdev driver is assuming that the supplier would have probed by the time it's probed. > > Adding more debug info: > > subdev_open:54: file v4l-subdev1 > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual > address 0000000000000000 > subdev_open:54: file v4l-subdev2 > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual > address 0000000000000000 > > Matching the subdev using sysfs gives: > > /sys/devices/platform/soc/e6500000.i2c/i2c-0/0-0070/video4linux/v4l-subdev1 > /sys/devices/platform/soc/e6500000.i2c/i2c-0/0-0070/video4linux/v4l-subdev2 > > The i2c device is the adi,adv7482 at address 0x70. I'm guessing the fix would be somewhere in this driver, but I haven't dug into it. Any guesses on which of its suppliers might have a direct/indirect dependency on an iommu/dma? You could also enable the debug log in fw_devlink_relax_link() and see if it relaxes any link where the supplier is an iommu/dma device. That might give us some hints. -Saravana > But now I'm lost... > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. > -- Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 5:55 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote: > > -Hideaki -- their email keeps bouncing. > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 11:13 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > > > Hi Saravana, > > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 12:46 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote: > > > This series is based on linux-next + these 2 small patches applies on top: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220526034609.480766-1-saravanak@google.com/ > > > > > > A lot of the deferred_probe_timeout logic is redundant with > > > fw_devlink=on. Also, enabling deferred_probe_timeout by default breaks > > > a few cases. > > > > > > This series tries to delete the redundant logic, simplify the frameworks > > > that use driver_deferred_probe_check_state(), enable > > > deferred_probe_timeout=10 by default, and fixes the nfsroot failure > > > case. > > > > > > The overall idea of this series is to replace the global behavior of > > > driver_deferred_probe_check_state() where all devices give up waiting on > > > supplier at the same time with a more granular behavior: > > > > > > 1. Devices with all their suppliers successfully probed by late_initcall > > > probe as usual and avoid unnecessary deferred probe attempts. > > > > > > 2. At or after late_initcall, in cases where boot would break because of > > > fw_devlink=on being strict about the ordering, we > > > > > > a. Temporarily relax the enforcement to probe any unprobed devices > > > that can probe successfully in the current state of the system. > > > For example, when we boot with a NFS rootfs and no network device > > > has probed. > > > b. Go back to enforcing the ordering for any devices that haven't > > > probed. > > > > > > 3. After deferred probe timeout expires, we permanently give up waiting > > > on supplier devices without drivers. At this point, whatever devices > > > can probe without some of their optional suppliers end up probing. > > > > > > In the case where module support is disabled, it's fairly > > > straightforward and all device probes are completed before the initcalls > > > are done. > > > > > > Patches 1 to 3 are fairly straightforward and can probably be applied > > > right away. > > > > > > Patches 4 to 6 are for fixing the NFS rootfs issue and setting the > > > default deferred_probe_timeout back to 10 seconds when modules are > > > enabled. > > > > > > Patches 7 to 9 are further clean up of the deferred_probe_timeout logic > > > so that no framework has to know/care about deferred_probe_timeout. > > > > > > Yoshihiro/Geert, > > > > > > If you can test this patch series and confirm that the NFS root case > > > works, I'd really appreciate that. > > > > Thanks, I gave this a try on various boards I have access to. > > The results were quite positive. E.g. the compile error I saw on v1 > > (implicit declation of fw_devlink_unblock_may_probe(), which is no longer > > used in v2) is gone. > > Thanks a lot for testing these. > > > However, I'm seeing a weird error when userspace (Debian9 nfsroot) is > > starting: > > > > [ OK ] Started D-Bus System Message Bus. > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual > > address 0000000000000000 > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual > > address 0000000000000000 > > Mem abort info: > > ESR = 0x0000000096000004 > > Mem abort info: > > ESR = 0x0000000096000004 > > EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits > > SET = 0, FnV = 0 > > EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits > > EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 > > FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault > > SET = 0, FnV = 0 > > Data abort info: > > ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 > > EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 > > FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault > > CM = 0, WnR = 0 > > user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=000000004ec45000 > > [0000000000000000] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 > > Data abort info: > > Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP > > CPU: 0 PID: 374 Comm: v4l_id Tainted: G W > > 5.19.0-rc1-arm64-renesas-00799-gc13c3e49e8bd #1660 > > ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 > > Hardware name: Renesas Ebisu-4D board based on r8a77990 (DT) > > pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) > > CM = 0, WnR = 0 > > pc : subdev_open+0x8c/0x128 > > lr : subdev_open+0x78/0x128 > > sp : ffff80000aadba60 > > x29: ffff80000aadba60 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff80000aadbc58 > > x26: 0000000000020000 x25: ffff00000b3aaf00 x24: 0000000000000000 > > x23: ffff00000c331c00 x22: ffff000009aa61b8 x21: ffff000009aa6000 > > x20: ffff000008bae3e8 x19: ffff00000c3fe200 x18: 0000000000000000 > > x17: ffff800076945000 x16: ffff800008004000 x15: 00008cc6bf550c7c > > x14: 000000000000038f x13: 000000000000001a x12: ffff00007fba8618 > > x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : ffff800009253954 > > x8 : ffff00000b3aaf00 x7 : 0000000000000004 x6 : 000000000000001a > > x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000001 > > x2 : 0000000100000001 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 > > Call trace: > > subdev_open+0x8c/0x128 After disassembling the code on my end (with slightly different config) and looking at 0x8c from the start of the function, I'm pretty sure the NULL deref is happening here inside subdev_open() if (sd->v4l2_dev->mdev && sd->entity.graph_obj.mdev->dev) { sd->entity.graph_obj.mdev == NULL. And going by the field names, I'm guessing these are suppliers pointed to by "remote-endpoint". Sadly fw_devlink can't extract any dependency info from remote-endpoint because the devices generally point to each other so a cycle is detected and the probe ordering isn't enforced between the endpoints. We still need to parse remote-endpoint to detect cycles created by a combination of endpoints/other properties (there's a real world case in upstream). > > v4l2_open+0xa4/0x120 > > chrdev_open+0x78/0x178 > > do_dentry_open+0xfc/0x398 > > vfs_open+0x28/0x30 > > path_openat+0x584/0x9c8 > > do_filp_open+0x80/0x108 > > do_sys_openat2+0x20c/0x2d8 > > user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=000000004ec53000 > > do_sys_open+0x54/0xa0 > > __arm64_sys_openat+0x20/0x28 > > invoke_syscall+0x40/0xf8 > > el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xf0/0x110 > > do_el0_svc+0x20/0x78 > > el0_svc+0x48/0xd0 > > el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb0/0xb8 > > el0t_64_sync+0x148/0x14c > > Code: f9405280 f9400400 b40000e0 f9400280 (f9400000) > > ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > > > This only happens on the Ebisu-4D board (r8a77990-ebisu.dts). > > I do not see this on the Salvator-X(S) boards. > > Ok. I don't know much about either of these boards. Are they supposed > to be very similar? > > > Bisection shows this starts to happen with "[PATCH v2 7/9] driver core: > > Set fw_devlink.strict=1 by default". > > So in the series, by this point, the previous patches would have > deferred probe timeout set to 10s (it can get extended on new driver > additions of course) and once the timer expires suppliers without > drivers will no longer block any consumers. The only difference > fw_devlink.strict=1 should cause is iommus and dmas dependency being > treated as mandatory till the timeout expires. > > In this instance, do you have iommu drivers and dma drivers compiled > in or loaded as modules or not available at all? In all these case, > the list of devices that would end up probing eventually should be the > same with or without fw_devlink.strict=1. The only difference would be > some reordering of probes. > > So this looks to me like improper error handling/assumption in the > driver for this subdev device. I'm guessing one of the suppliers to > this subdev has a direct/indirect dependency on iommus and this subdev > driver is assuming that the supplier would have probed by the time > it's probed. > > > > > Adding more debug info: > > > > subdev_open:54: file v4l-subdev1 > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual > > address 0000000000000000 > > subdev_open:54: file v4l-subdev2 > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual > > address 0000000000000000 How did you get these two "subdev_open" strings? And how/why the NULL deref there? > > > > Matching the subdev using sysfs gives: > > > > /sys/devices/platform/soc/e6500000.i2c/i2c-0/0-0070/video4linux/v4l-subdev1 > > /sys/devices/platform/soc/e6500000.i2c/i2c-0/0-0070/video4linux/v4l-subdev2 > > > > The i2c device is the adi,adv7482 at address 0x70. > > I'm guessing the fix would be somewhere in this driver, but I haven't > dug into it. Any guesses on which of its suppliers might have a > direct/indirect dependency on an iommu/dma? You could also enable the > debug log in fw_devlink_relax_link() and see if it relaxes any link > where the supplier is an iommu/dma device. That might give us some > hints. After spending way too much time on this looking at drivers/media/v4l2-core, drivers/media/mc and drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/ code, I'm guessing the ordering issue is probably between "csi40:" device and the video-receiver@70 (the "adi,adv7482") device. Based on your points about the sysfs, I was initially digging into drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-core.c. But then the parent of video-receiver@70 is an i2c0 that has dmas dependencies. The csi40: (referred to from video-controller) doesn't seem to have any iommu or dmas dependency. So my guess is the csi40 gets probed first and then assumes the video-controller is already available. Can you use this info to take a stab at debugging this further? TL;DR is that I think this is some driver issue where it's not checking for one of its suppliers to be ready yet. -Saravana > > -Saravana > > > But now I'm lost... > > > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > > > Geert > > > > -- > > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org > > > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But > > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. > > -- Linus Torvalds
Hi Saravana, On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 6:17 AM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 5:55 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 11:13 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 12:46 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote: > > > > This series is based on linux-next + these 2 small patches applies on top: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220526034609.480766-1-saravanak@google.com/ > > > > > > > > A lot of the deferred_probe_timeout logic is redundant with > > > > fw_devlink=on. Also, enabling deferred_probe_timeout by default breaks > > > > a few cases. > > > > > > > > This series tries to delete the redundant logic, simplify the frameworks > > > > that use driver_deferred_probe_check_state(), enable > > > > deferred_probe_timeout=10 by default, and fixes the nfsroot failure > > > > case. > > > > > > > > The overall idea of this series is to replace the global behavior of > > > > driver_deferred_probe_check_state() where all devices give up waiting on > > > > supplier at the same time with a more granular behavior: > > > > > > > > 1. Devices with all their suppliers successfully probed by late_initcall > > > > probe as usual and avoid unnecessary deferred probe attempts. > > > > > > > > 2. At or after late_initcall, in cases where boot would break because of > > > > fw_devlink=on being strict about the ordering, we > > > > > > > > a. Temporarily relax the enforcement to probe any unprobed devices > > > > that can probe successfully in the current state of the system. > > > > For example, when we boot with a NFS rootfs and no network device > > > > has probed. > > > > b. Go back to enforcing the ordering for any devices that haven't > > > > probed. > > > > > > > > 3. After deferred probe timeout expires, we permanently give up waiting > > > > on supplier devices without drivers. At this point, whatever devices > > > > can probe without some of their optional suppliers end up probing. > > > > > > > > In the case where module support is disabled, it's fairly > > > > straightforward and all device probes are completed before the initcalls > > > > are done. > > > > > > > > Patches 1 to 3 are fairly straightforward and can probably be applied > > > > right away. > > > > > > > > Patches 4 to 6 are for fixing the NFS rootfs issue and setting the > > > > default deferred_probe_timeout back to 10 seconds when modules are > > > > enabled. > > > > > > > > Patches 7 to 9 are further clean up of the deferred_probe_timeout logic > > > > so that no framework has to know/care about deferred_probe_timeout. > > > > > > > > Yoshihiro/Geert, > > > > > > > > If you can test this patch series and confirm that the NFS root case > > > > works, I'd really appreciate that. > > > > > > Thanks, I gave this a try on various boards I have access to. > > > The results were quite positive. E.g. the compile error I saw on v1 > > > (implicit declation of fw_devlink_unblock_may_probe(), which is no longer > > > used in v2) is gone. > > > > Thanks a lot for testing these. > > > > > However, I'm seeing a weird error when userspace (Debian9 nfsroot) is > > > starting: > > > > > > [ OK ] Started D-Bus System Message Bus. > > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual > > > address 0000000000000000 > > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual > > > address 0000000000000000 > > > Mem abort info: > > > ESR = 0x0000000096000004 > > > Mem abort info: > > > ESR = 0x0000000096000004 > > > EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits > > > SET = 0, FnV = 0 > > > EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits > > > EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 > > > FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault > > > SET = 0, FnV = 0 > > > Data abort info: > > > ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 > > > EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 > > > FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault > > > CM = 0, WnR = 0 > > > user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=000000004ec45000 > > > [0000000000000000] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 > > > Data abort info: > > > Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP > > > CPU: 0 PID: 374 Comm: v4l_id Tainted: G W > > > 5.19.0-rc1-arm64-renesas-00799-gc13c3e49e8bd #1660 > > > ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 > > > Hardware name: Renesas Ebisu-4D board based on r8a77990 (DT) > > > pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) > > > CM = 0, WnR = 0 > > > pc : subdev_open+0x8c/0x128 > > > lr : subdev_open+0x78/0x128 > > > sp : ffff80000aadba60 > > > x29: ffff80000aadba60 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff80000aadbc58 > > > x26: 0000000000020000 x25: ffff00000b3aaf00 x24: 0000000000000000 > > > x23: ffff00000c331c00 x22: ffff000009aa61b8 x21: ffff000009aa6000 > > > x20: ffff000008bae3e8 x19: ffff00000c3fe200 x18: 0000000000000000 > > > x17: ffff800076945000 x16: ffff800008004000 x15: 00008cc6bf550c7c > > > x14: 000000000000038f x13: 000000000000001a x12: ffff00007fba8618 > > > x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : ffff800009253954 > > > x8 : ffff00000b3aaf00 x7 : 0000000000000004 x6 : 000000000000001a > > > x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000001 > > > x2 : 0000000100000001 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 > > > Call trace: > > > subdev_open+0x8c/0x128 > > After disassembling the code on my end (with slightly different > config) and looking at 0x8c from the start of the function, I'm pretty > sure the NULL deref is happening here inside subdev_open() > > if (sd->v4l2_dev->mdev && sd->entity.graph_obj.mdev->dev) { > > sd->entity.graph_obj.mdev == NULL. > > And going by the field names, I'm guessing these are suppliers pointed > to by "remote-endpoint". Sadly fw_devlink can't extract any dependency > info from remote-endpoint because the devices generally point to each > other so a cycle is detected and the probe ordering isn't enforced > between the endpoints. We still need to parse remote-endpoint to > detect cycles created by a combination of endpoints/other properties > (there's a real world case in upstream). > > > > v4l2_open+0xa4/0x120 > > > chrdev_open+0x78/0x178 > > > do_dentry_open+0xfc/0x398 > > > vfs_open+0x28/0x30 > > > path_openat+0x584/0x9c8 > > > do_filp_open+0x80/0x108 > > > do_sys_openat2+0x20c/0x2d8 > > > user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=000000004ec53000 > > > do_sys_open+0x54/0xa0 > > > __arm64_sys_openat+0x20/0x28 > > > invoke_syscall+0x40/0xf8 > > > el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xf0/0x110 > > > do_el0_svc+0x20/0x78 > > > el0_svc+0x48/0xd0 > > > el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb0/0xb8 > > > el0t_64_sync+0x148/0x14c > > > Code: f9405280 f9400400 b40000e0 f9400280 (f9400000) > > > ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > > > > > This only happens on the Ebisu-4D board (r8a77990-ebisu.dts). > > > I do not see this on the Salvator-X(S) boards. > > > > Ok. I don't know much about either of these boards. Are they supposed > > to be very similar? > > > > > Bisection shows this starts to happen with "[PATCH v2 7/9] driver core: > > > Set fw_devlink.strict=1 by default". > > > > So in the series, by this point, the previous patches would have > > deferred probe timeout set to 10s (it can get extended on new driver > > additions of course) and once the timer expires suppliers without > > drivers will no longer block any consumers. The only difference > > fw_devlink.strict=1 should cause is iommus and dmas dependency being > > treated as mandatory till the timeout expires. > > > > In this instance, do you have iommu drivers and dma drivers compiled > > in or loaded as modules or not available at all? In all these case, > > the list of devices that would end up probing eventually should be the > > same with or without fw_devlink.strict=1. The only difference would be > > some reordering of probes. > > > > So this looks to me like improper error handling/assumption in the > > driver for this subdev device. I'm guessing one of the suppliers to > > this subdev has a direct/indirect dependency on iommus and this subdev > > driver is assuming that the supplier would have probed by the time > > it's probed. > > > > > > > > Adding more debug info: > > > > > > subdev_open:54: file v4l-subdev1 > > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual > > > address 0000000000000000 > > > subdev_open:54: file v4l-subdev2 > > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual > > > address 0000000000000000 > > How did you get these two "subdev_open" strings? And how/why the NULL > deref there? I added a debug print at the top of subdev_open(): pr_info("%s:%u: file %pD\n", __func__, __LINE__, file); The NULL deref is the actual issue. > > > Matching the subdev using sysfs gives: > > > > > > /sys/devices/platform/soc/e6500000.i2c/i2c-0/0-0070/video4linux/v4l-subdev1 > > > /sys/devices/platform/soc/e6500000.i2c/i2c-0/0-0070/video4linux/v4l-subdev2 > > > > > > The i2c device is the adi,adv7482 at address 0x70. > > > > I'm guessing the fix would be somewhere in this driver, but I haven't > > dug into it. Any guesses on which of its suppliers might have a > > direct/indirect dependency on an iommu/dma? You could also enable the > > debug log in fw_devlink_relax_link() and see if it relaxes any link > > where the supplier is an iommu/dma device. That might give us some > > hints. > > After spending way too much time on this looking at > drivers/media/v4l2-core, drivers/media/mc and > drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/ code, I'm guessing the ordering issue is > probably between "csi40:" device and the video-receiver@70 (the > "adi,adv7482") device. > > Based on your points about the sysfs, I was initially digging into > drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-core.c. But then the parent of > video-receiver@70 is an i2c0 that has dmas dependencies. The csi40: > (referred to from video-controller) doesn't seem to have any iommu or > dmas dependency. So my guess is the csi40 gets probed first and then > assumes the video-controller is already available. > > Can you use this info to take a stab at debugging this further? Thanks for looking into this, there is indeed a cyclic dependency: i2c 0-0070: Fixing up cyclic dependency with feaa0000.csi2 i2c 0-0070: Fixing up cyclic dependency with hdmi-in i2c 0-0070: Fixing up cyclic dependency with cvbs-in > TL;DR is that I think this is some driver issue where it's not > checking for one of its suppliers to be ready yet. Setting fw_devlink_strict to true vs. false seems to influence which of two different failures will happen: - rcar-csi2: probe of feaa0000.csi2 failed with error -22 - rcar-vin: probe of e6ef5000.video failed with error -22 The former causes the NULL pointer dereference later. The latter existed before, but I hadn't noticed it, and bisection led to the real culprit (commit 3e52419ec04f9769 ("media: rcar-{csi2,vin}: Move to full Virtual Channel routing per CSI-2 IP"). I am bringing it up with the multi-media guys in https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220124124858.571363-4-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se... Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 3:26 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > Hi Saravana, > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 6:17 AM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 5:55 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 11:13 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 12:46 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote: > > > > > This series is based on linux-next + these 2 small patches applies on top: > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220526034609.480766-1-saravanak@google.com/ > > > > > > > > > > A lot of the deferred_probe_timeout logic is redundant with > > > > > fw_devlink=on. Also, enabling deferred_probe_timeout by default breaks > > > > > a few cases. > > > > > > > > > > This series tries to delete the redundant logic, simplify the frameworks > > > > > that use driver_deferred_probe_check_state(), enable > > > > > deferred_probe_timeout=10 by default, and fixes the nfsroot failure > > > > > case. > > > > > > > > > > The overall idea of this series is to replace the global behavior of > > > > > driver_deferred_probe_check_state() where all devices give up waiting on > > > > > supplier at the same time with a more granular behavior: > > > > > > > > > > 1. Devices with all their suppliers successfully probed by late_initcall > > > > > probe as usual and avoid unnecessary deferred probe attempts. > > > > > > > > > > 2. At or after late_initcall, in cases where boot would break because of > > > > > fw_devlink=on being strict about the ordering, we > > > > > > > > > > a. Temporarily relax the enforcement to probe any unprobed devices > > > > > that can probe successfully in the current state of the system. > > > > > For example, when we boot with a NFS rootfs and no network device > > > > > has probed. > > > > > b. Go back to enforcing the ordering for any devices that haven't > > > > > probed. > > > > > > > > > > 3. After deferred probe timeout expires, we permanently give up waiting > > > > > on supplier devices without drivers. At this point, whatever devices > > > > > can probe without some of their optional suppliers end up probing. > > > > > > > > > > In the case where module support is disabled, it's fairly > > > > > straightforward and all device probes are completed before the initcalls > > > > > are done. > > > > > > > > > > Patches 1 to 3 are fairly straightforward and can probably be applied > > > > > right away. > > > > > > > > > > Patches 4 to 6 are for fixing the NFS rootfs issue and setting the > > > > > default deferred_probe_timeout back to 10 seconds when modules are > > > > > enabled. > > > > > > > > > > Patches 7 to 9 are further clean up of the deferred_probe_timeout logic > > > > > so that no framework has to know/care about deferred_probe_timeout. > > > > > > > > > > Yoshihiro/Geert, > > > > > > > > > > If you can test this patch series and confirm that the NFS root case > > > > > works, I'd really appreciate that. > > > > > > > > Thanks, I gave this a try on various boards I have access to. > > > > The results were quite positive. E.g. the compile error I saw on v1 > > > > (implicit declation of fw_devlink_unblock_may_probe(), which is no longer > > > > used in v2) is gone. > > > > > > Thanks a lot for testing these. > > > > > > > However, I'm seeing a weird error when userspace (Debian9 nfsroot) is > > > > starting: > > > > > > > > [ OK ] Started D-Bus System Message Bus. > > > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual > > > > address 0000000000000000 > > > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual > > > > address 0000000000000000 > > > > Mem abort info: > > > > ESR = 0x0000000096000004 > > > > Mem abort info: > > > > ESR = 0x0000000096000004 > > > > EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits > > > > SET = 0, FnV = 0 > > > > EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits > > > > EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 > > > > FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault > > > > SET = 0, FnV = 0 > > > > Data abort info: > > > > ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 > > > > EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 > > > > FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault > > > > CM = 0, WnR = 0 > > > > user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=000000004ec45000 > > > > [0000000000000000] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 > > > > Data abort info: > > > > Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP > > > > CPU: 0 PID: 374 Comm: v4l_id Tainted: G W > > > > 5.19.0-rc1-arm64-renesas-00799-gc13c3e49e8bd #1660 > > > > ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 > > > > Hardware name: Renesas Ebisu-4D board based on r8a77990 (DT) > > > > pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) > > > > CM = 0, WnR = 0 > > > > pc : subdev_open+0x8c/0x128 > > > > lr : subdev_open+0x78/0x128 > > > > sp : ffff80000aadba60 > > > > x29: ffff80000aadba60 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff80000aadbc58 > > > > x26: 0000000000020000 x25: ffff00000b3aaf00 x24: 0000000000000000 > > > > x23: ffff00000c331c00 x22: ffff000009aa61b8 x21: ffff000009aa6000 > > > > x20: ffff000008bae3e8 x19: ffff00000c3fe200 x18: 0000000000000000 > > > > x17: ffff800076945000 x16: ffff800008004000 x15: 00008cc6bf550c7c > > > > x14: 000000000000038f x13: 000000000000001a x12: ffff00007fba8618 > > > > x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : ffff800009253954 > > > > x8 : ffff00000b3aaf00 x7 : 0000000000000004 x6 : 000000000000001a > > > > x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000001 > > > > x2 : 0000000100000001 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 > > > > Call trace: > > > > subdev_open+0x8c/0x128 > > > > After disassembling the code on my end (with slightly different > > config) and looking at 0x8c from the start of the function, I'm pretty > > sure the NULL deref is happening here inside subdev_open() > > > > if (sd->v4l2_dev->mdev && sd->entity.graph_obj.mdev->dev) { > > > > sd->entity.graph_obj.mdev == NULL. > > > > And going by the field names, I'm guessing these are suppliers pointed > > to by "remote-endpoint". Sadly fw_devlink can't extract any dependency > > info from remote-endpoint because the devices generally point to each > > other so a cycle is detected and the probe ordering isn't enforced > > between the endpoints. We still need to parse remote-endpoint to > > detect cycles created by a combination of endpoints/other properties > > (there's a real world case in upstream). > > > > > > v4l2_open+0xa4/0x120 > > > > chrdev_open+0x78/0x178 > > > > do_dentry_open+0xfc/0x398 > > > > vfs_open+0x28/0x30 > > > > path_openat+0x584/0x9c8 > > > > do_filp_open+0x80/0x108 > > > > do_sys_openat2+0x20c/0x2d8 > > > > user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=000000004ec53000 > > > > do_sys_open+0x54/0xa0 > > > > __arm64_sys_openat+0x20/0x28 > > > > invoke_syscall+0x40/0xf8 > > > > el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xf0/0x110 > > > > do_el0_svc+0x20/0x78 > > > > el0_svc+0x48/0xd0 > > > > el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb0/0xb8 > > > > el0t_64_sync+0x148/0x14c > > > > Code: f9405280 f9400400 b40000e0 f9400280 (f9400000) > > > > ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- > > > > > > > > This only happens on the Ebisu-4D board (r8a77990-ebisu.dts). > > > > I do not see this on the Salvator-X(S) boards. > > > > > > Ok. I don't know much about either of these boards. Are they supposed > > > to be very similar? > > > > > > > Bisection shows this starts to happen with "[PATCH v2 7/9] driver core: > > > > Set fw_devlink.strict=1 by default". > > > > > > So in the series, by this point, the previous patches would have > > > deferred probe timeout set to 10s (it can get extended on new driver > > > additions of course) and once the timer expires suppliers without > > > drivers will no longer block any consumers. The only difference > > > fw_devlink.strict=1 should cause is iommus and dmas dependency being > > > treated as mandatory till the timeout expires. > > > > > > In this instance, do you have iommu drivers and dma drivers compiled > > > in or loaded as modules or not available at all? In all these case, > > > the list of devices that would end up probing eventually should be the > > > same with or without fw_devlink.strict=1. The only difference would be > > > some reordering of probes. > > > > > > So this looks to me like improper error handling/assumption in the > > > driver for this subdev device. I'm guessing one of the suppliers to > > > this subdev has a direct/indirect dependency on iommus and this subdev > > > driver is assuming that the supplier would have probed by the time > > > it's probed. > > > > > > > > > > > Adding more debug info: > > > > > > > > subdev_open:54: file v4l-subdev1 > > > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual > > > > address 0000000000000000 > > > > subdev_open:54: file v4l-subdev2 > > > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual > > > > address 0000000000000000 > > > > How did you get these two "subdev_open" strings? And how/why the NULL > > deref there? > > I added a debug print at the top of subdev_open(): > > pr_info("%s:%u: file %pD\n", __func__, __LINE__, file); > > The NULL deref is the actual issue. > > > > > Matching the subdev using sysfs gives: > > > > > > > > /sys/devices/platform/soc/e6500000.i2c/i2c-0/0-0070/video4linux/v4l-subdev1 > > > > /sys/devices/platform/soc/e6500000.i2c/i2c-0/0-0070/video4linux/v4l-subdev2 > > > > > > > > The i2c device is the adi,adv7482 at address 0x70. > > > > > > I'm guessing the fix would be somewhere in this driver, but I haven't > > > dug into it. Any guesses on which of its suppliers might have a > > > direct/indirect dependency on an iommu/dma? You could also enable the > > > debug log in fw_devlink_relax_link() and see if it relaxes any link > > > where the supplier is an iommu/dma device. That might give us some > > > hints. > > > > After spending way too much time on this looking at > > drivers/media/v4l2-core, drivers/media/mc and > > drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/ code, I'm guessing the ordering issue is > > probably between "csi40:" device and the video-receiver@70 (the > > "adi,adv7482") device. > > > > Based on your points about the sysfs, I was initially digging into > > drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x-core.c. But then the parent of > > video-receiver@70 is an i2c0 that has dmas dependencies. The csi40: > > (referred to from video-controller) doesn't seem to have any iommu or > > dmas dependency. So my guess is the csi40 gets probed first and then > > assumes the video-controller is already available. > > > > Can you use this info to take a stab at debugging this further? > > Thanks for looking into this, there is indeed a cyclic dependency: > > i2c 0-0070: Fixing up cyclic dependency with feaa0000.csi2 > i2c 0-0070: Fixing up cyclic dependency with hdmi-in > i2c 0-0070: Fixing up cyclic dependency with cvbs-in > > > TL;DR is that I think this is some driver issue where it's not > > checking for one of its suppliers to be ready yet. > > Setting fw_devlink_strict to true vs. false seems to influence which of > two different failures will happen: > - rcar-csi2: probe of feaa0000.csi2 failed with error -22 > - rcar-vin: probe of e6ef5000.video failed with error -22 > The former causes the NULL pointer dereference later. > The latter existed before, but I hadn't noticed it, and bisection > led to the real culprit (commit 3e52419ec04f9769 ("media: rcar-{csi2,vin}: > Move to full Virtual Channel routing per CSI-2 IP"). If you revert that patch, does this series work fine? If yes, are you happy with giving this a Tested-by? -Saravana > > I am bringing it up with the multi-media guys in > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220124124858.571363-4-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se... > > Thanks! > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. > -- Linus Torvalds
Hi Saravana, On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 8:13 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 3:26 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 6:17 AM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 5:55 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 11:13 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 12:46 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote: > > > > > > This series is based on linux-next + these 2 small patches applies on top: > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220526034609.480766-1-saravanak@google.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > A lot of the deferred_probe_timeout logic is redundant with > > > > > > fw_devlink=on. Also, enabling deferred_probe_timeout by default breaks > > > > > > a few cases. > > > > > > > > > > > > This series tries to delete the redundant logic, simplify the frameworks > > > > > > that use driver_deferred_probe_check_state(), enable > > > > > > deferred_probe_timeout=10 by default, and fixes the nfsroot failure > > > > > > case. > > > > > > > > > > > > The overall idea of this series is to replace the global behavior of > > > > > > driver_deferred_probe_check_state() where all devices give up waiting on > > > > > > supplier at the same time with a more granular behavior: > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Devices with all their suppliers successfully probed by late_initcall > > > > > > probe as usual and avoid unnecessary deferred probe attempts. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. At or after late_initcall, in cases where boot would break because of > > > > > > fw_devlink=on being strict about the ordering, we > > > > > > > > > > > > a. Temporarily relax the enforcement to probe any unprobed devices > > > > > > that can probe successfully in the current state of the system. > > > > > > For example, when we boot with a NFS rootfs and no network device > > > > > > has probed. > > > > > > b. Go back to enforcing the ordering for any devices that haven't > > > > > > probed. > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. After deferred probe timeout expires, we permanently give up waiting > > > > > > on supplier devices without drivers. At this point, whatever devices > > > > > > can probe without some of their optional suppliers end up probing. > > > > > > > > > > > > In the case where module support is disabled, it's fairly > > > > > > straightforward and all device probes are completed before the initcalls > > > > > > are done. > > > > > > > > > > > > Patches 1 to 3 are fairly straightforward and can probably be applied > > > > > > right away. > > > > > > > > > > > > Patches 4 to 6 are for fixing the NFS rootfs issue and setting the > > > > > > default deferred_probe_timeout back to 10 seconds when modules are > > > > > > enabled. > > > > > > > > > > > > Patches 7 to 9 are further clean up of the deferred_probe_timeout logic > > > > > > so that no framework has to know/care about deferred_probe_timeout. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yoshihiro/Geert, > > > > > > > > > > > > If you can test this patch series and confirm that the NFS root case > > > > > > works, I'd really appreciate that. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, I gave this a try on various boards I have access to. > > > > > The results were quite positive. E.g. the compile error I saw on v1 > > > > > (implicit declation of fw_devlink_unblock_may_probe(), which is no longer > > > > > used in v2) is gone. > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for testing these. > > > > > > > > > However, I'm seeing a weird error when userspace (Debian9 nfsroot) is > > > > > starting: > > Setting fw_devlink_strict to true vs. false seems to influence which of > > two different failures will happen: > > - rcar-csi2: probe of feaa0000.csi2 failed with error -22 > > - rcar-vin: probe of e6ef5000.video failed with error -22 > > The former causes the NULL pointer dereference later. > > The latter existed before, but I hadn't noticed it, and bisection > > led to the real culprit (commit 3e52419ec04f9769 ("media: rcar-{csi2,vin}: > > Move to full Virtual Channel routing per CSI-2 IP"). > > If you revert that patch, does this series work fine? If yes, are you > happy with giving this a Tested-by? Sure, sorry for forgetting that ;-) Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 11:54 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > Hi Saravana, > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 8:13 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 3:26 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 6:17 AM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 5:55 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 11:13 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 12:46 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote: > > > > > > > This series is based on linux-next + these 2 small patches applies on top: > > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220526034609.480766-1-saravanak@google.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A lot of the deferred_probe_timeout logic is redundant with > > > > > > > fw_devlink=on. Also, enabling deferred_probe_timeout by default breaks > > > > > > > a few cases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This series tries to delete the redundant logic, simplify the frameworks > > > > > > > that use driver_deferred_probe_check_state(), enable > > > > > > > deferred_probe_timeout=10 by default, and fixes the nfsroot failure > > > > > > > case. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The overall idea of this series is to replace the global behavior of > > > > > > > driver_deferred_probe_check_state() where all devices give up waiting on > > > > > > > supplier at the same time with a more granular behavior: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Devices with all their suppliers successfully probed by late_initcall > > > > > > > probe as usual and avoid unnecessary deferred probe attempts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. At or after late_initcall, in cases where boot would break because of > > > > > > > fw_devlink=on being strict about the ordering, we > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a. Temporarily relax the enforcement to probe any unprobed devices > > > > > > > that can probe successfully in the current state of the system. > > > > > > > For example, when we boot with a NFS rootfs and no network device > > > > > > > has probed. > > > > > > > b. Go back to enforcing the ordering for any devices that haven't > > > > > > > probed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. After deferred probe timeout expires, we permanently give up waiting > > > > > > > on supplier devices without drivers. At this point, whatever devices > > > > > > > can probe without some of their optional suppliers end up probing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In the case where module support is disabled, it's fairly > > > > > > > straightforward and all device probes are completed before the initcalls > > > > > > > are done. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Patches 1 to 3 are fairly straightforward and can probably be applied > > > > > > > right away. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Patches 4 to 6 are for fixing the NFS rootfs issue and setting the > > > > > > > default deferred_probe_timeout back to 10 seconds when modules are > > > > > > > enabled. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Patches 7 to 9 are further clean up of the deferred_probe_timeout logic > > > > > > > so that no framework has to know/care about deferred_probe_timeout. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yoshihiro/Geert, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you can test this patch series and confirm that the NFS root case > > > > > > > works, I'd really appreciate that. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, I gave this a try on various boards I have access to. > > > > > > The results were quite positive. E.g. the compile error I saw on v1 > > > > > > (implicit declation of fw_devlink_unblock_may_probe(), which is no longer > > > > > > used in v2) is gone. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for testing these. > > > > > > > > > > > However, I'm seeing a weird error when userspace (Debian9 nfsroot) is > > > > > > starting: > > > > Setting fw_devlink_strict to true vs. false seems to influence which of > > > two different failures will happen: > > > - rcar-csi2: probe of feaa0000.csi2 failed with error -22 > > > - rcar-vin: probe of e6ef5000.video failed with error -22 > > > The former causes the NULL pointer dereference later. > > > The latter existed before, but I hadn't noticed it, and bisection > > > led to the real culprit (commit 3e52419ec04f9769 ("media: rcar-{csi2,vin}: > > > Move to full Virtual Channel routing per CSI-2 IP"). > > > > If you revert that patch, does this series work fine? If yes, are you > > happy with giving this a Tested-by? > > Sure, sorry for forgetting that ;-) > > Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> +few folks who I forgot to add. Geert, Thanks for the extensive testing! Linus W, Ulf, Kevin, Will, Rob, Vladimir, Can I get your reviews for the deletion of driver_deferred_probe_check_state() please? We can finally remove it and have frameworks not needing to know about it. Greg, Rafael, Can you review the wait_for_init_devices_probe() patch and the other trivial driver core changes please? David/Jakub, Do the IP4 autoconfig changes look reasonable to you? Thanks, Saravana > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. > -- Linus Torvalds
On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 14:07:44 -0700 Saravana Kannan wrote: > David/Jakub, > > Do the IP4 autoconfig changes look reasonable to you? I'm no expert in this area, I'd trust the opinion of the embedded folks (adding Florian as well) more than myself. It's unclear to me why we'd wait_for_init_devices_probe() after the first failed iteration, sleep, and then allow 11 more iterations with wait_for_device_probe(). Let me also add Thomas since he wrote e2ffe3ff6f5e ("net: ipconfig: Wait for deferred device probes").
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 3:49 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 14:07:44 -0700 Saravana Kannan wrote: > > David/Jakub, > > > > Do the IP4 autoconfig changes look reasonable to you? > > I'm no expert in this area, I'd trust the opinion of the embedded folks > (adding Florian as well) more than myself. Thanks. > It's unclear to me why we'd > wait_for_init_devices_probe() after the first failed iteration, wait_for_init_devices_probe() relaxes ordering rules for all devices and it's not something we want to do unless we really need it. That's why we are doing that only if we can't find any network device in the first iteration. > sleep, > and then allow 11 more iterations with wait_for_device_probe(). > Let me also add Thomas since he wrote e2ffe3ff6f5e ("net: ipconfig: > Wait for deferred device probes"). Even without this change, I'm not sure the wait_for_device_probe() needs to be within the loop. It's probably sufficient to just do it once in the beginning, but it's already there and I'm not sure if I'm missing some scenarios, so I left that part as is. -Saravana