diff mbox series

[v2,10/20] ARM: dts: nuvoton: add reset syscon property

Message ID 20220608095623.22327-11-tmaimon77@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Handled Elsewhere
Headers show
Series Introduce Nuvoton Arbel NPCM8XX BMC SoC | expand

Commit Message

Tomer Maimon June 8, 2022, 9:56 a.m. UTC
Add nuvoton,sysgcr syscon property to the reset
node to handle the general control registers.

Signed-off-by: Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@gmail.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/nuvoton-common-npcm7xx.dtsi | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Tomer Maimon June 9, 2022, 9:30 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Krzysztof,

Thanks for your comments

On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 13:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 08/06/2022 11:56, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> > Add nuvoton,sysgcr syscon property to the reset
> > node to handle the general control registers.
>
> Wrong wrapping.
it will be very helpful if you could point me what wrong wrapped in
the commit message, is it the explanation or the header? or something
else?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Best regards,

Tomer
Benjamin Fair June 9, 2022, 10:10 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Tomer,

On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 at 14:30, Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> Thanks for your comments
>
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 13:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 08/06/2022 11:56, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> > > Add nuvoton,sysgcr syscon property to the reset
> > > node to handle the general control registers.
> >
> > Wrong wrapping.
> it will be very helpful if you could point me what wrong wrapped in
> the commit message, is it the explanation or the header? or something
> else?

The commit message body should be wrapped at 72 chars. You can fit
more on the first line if you reflow:

Add nuvoton,sysgcr syscon property to the reset node to handle the
general control registers.

> >
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tomer
Tomer Maimon June 9, 2022, 11:22 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Benjamin,

Thanks a lot for your explanation.

will be applied in next patch set

Best regards,

Tomer

On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 at 01:11, Benjamin Fair <benjaminfair@google.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Tomer,
>
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 at 14:30, Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > Thanks for your comments
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 13:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 08/06/2022 11:56, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> > > > Add nuvoton,sysgcr syscon property to the reset
> > > > node to handle the general control registers.
> > >
> > > Wrong wrapping.
> > it will be very helpful if you could point me what wrong wrapped in
> > the commit message, is it the explanation or the header? or something
> > else?
>
> The commit message body should be wrapped at 72 chars. You can fit
> more on the first line if you reflow:
>
> Add nuvoton,sysgcr syscon property to the reset node to handle the
> general control registers.
>
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Krzysztof
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Tomer
Krzysztof Kozlowski June 10, 2022, 9:51 a.m. UTC | #4
On 09/06/2022 23:30, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> Thanks for your comments
> 
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 13:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 08/06/2022 11:56, Tomer Maimon wrote:
>>> Add nuvoton,sysgcr syscon property to the reset
>>> node to handle the general control registers.
>>
>> Wrong wrapping.
> it will be very helpful if you could point me what wrong wrapped in
> the commit message, is it the explanation or the header? or something
> else?

I pointed you last time. I pointed the exact line, exact rule you need
to follow. I pointed it three times already and three times I said
wrapping is wrong:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.18-rc4/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L586

"The body of the explanation, line wrapped at 75 columns, which will be
copied to the permanent changelog to describe this patch."

Your wrapping is not at 75 columns and it causes the commit to be less
readable, without any reason. Please follow Linux kernel coding style/rules.


Best regards,
Krzysztof
Tomer Maimon June 13, 2022, 7:15 a.m. UTC | #5
Hi Krzysztof,

Thanks for the clarifications, will update the next version.

Best regards,

Tomer

On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 at 12:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 09/06/2022 23:30, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > Thanks for your comments
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 13:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 08/06/2022 11:56, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> >>> Add nuvoton,sysgcr syscon property to the reset
> >>> node to handle the general control registers.
> >>
> >> Wrong wrapping.
> > it will be very helpful if you could point me what wrong wrapped in
> > the commit message, is it the explanation or the header? or something
> > else?
>
> I pointed you last time. I pointed the exact line, exact rule you need
> to follow. I pointed it three times already and three times I said
> wrapping is wrong:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.18-rc4/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L586
>
> "The body of the explanation, line wrapped at 75 columns, which will be
> copied to the permanent changelog to describe this patch."
>
> Your wrapping is not at 75 columns and it causes the commit to be less
> readable, without any reason. Please follow Linux kernel coding style/rules.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nuvoton-common-npcm7xx.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nuvoton-common-npcm7xx.dtsi
index 3696980a3da1..8a2f29016291 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nuvoton-common-npcm7xx.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nuvoton-common-npcm7xx.dtsi
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@  rstc: rstc@f0801000 {
 			compatible = "nuvoton,npcm750-reset";
 			reg = <0xf0801000 0x70>;
 			#reset-cells = <2>;
+			nuvoton,sysgcr = <&gcr>;
 		};
 
 		clk: clock-controller@f0801000 {