diff mbox series

soc: mediatek: mutex: add suffix 0 to DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER for mt8395

Message ID 20220622131952.29583-1-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series soc: mediatek: mutex: add suffix 0 to DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER for mt8395 | expand

Commit Message

Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) June 22, 2022, 1:19 p.m. UTC
Add suffix 0 to DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER for mt8395.

Fixes: 141311b856d8 ("soc: mediatek: mutex: add MT8365 support")
Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

AngeloGioacchino Del Regno June 22, 2022, 1:31 p.m. UTC | #1
Il 22/06/22 15:19, Jason-JH.Lin ha scritto:
> Add suffix 0 to DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER for mt8395.
> 
> Fixes: 141311b856d8 ("soc: mediatek: mutex: add MT8365 support")
> Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>


Hello Jason-JH,

you must've missed my commit, sent two days ago, which is doing the same:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220620102454.131417-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com/T/#u

Anyway, I have avoided to rename the definition, as from what I understand
MT8365 has only one dither mod and that's called "DITHER", not "DITHER0"...
...but I've added the suffix to the array assignment, as that's what we have
in the enumeration.

I think that #define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER should be kept as-is.

Also... this commit is not fixing anything, as it was already working before,
so the Fixes tag shouldn't be present.

Regards,
Angelo

> ---
>   drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> index fa8e0ba38803..3b25fd6b91aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
>   #define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_CCORR		13
>   #define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_AAL		14
>   #define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_GAMMA		15
> -#define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER		16
> +#define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER0		16
>   #define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DSI0		17
>   #define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_PWM0		20
>   #define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DPI0		22
> @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ static const unsigned int mt8365_mutex_mod[DDP_COMPONENT_ID_MAX] = {
>   	[DDP_COMPONENT_AAL0] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_AAL,
>   	[DDP_COMPONENT_CCORR] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_CCORR,
>   	[DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR0] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_COLOR0,
> -	[DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER,
> +	[DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER0] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER0,
>   	[DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DPI0,
>   	[DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DSI0,
>   	[DDP_COMPONENT_GAMMA] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_GAMMA,
Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) June 23, 2022, 12:33 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Angelo,

Yes, I missed that!
So just forget about this patch and use yours.

Thanks for your help :)

Regard,
Jason-JH.Lin

On Wed, 2022-06-22 at 15:31 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 22/06/22 15:19, Jason-JH.Lin ha scritto:
> > Add suffix 0 to DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER for mt8395.
> > 
> > Fixes: 141311b856d8 ("soc: mediatek: mutex: add MT8365 support")
> > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
> 
> 
> Hello Jason-JH,
> 
> you must've missed my commit, sent two days ago, which is doing the
> same:
> 
> 
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220620102454.131417-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com/T/#u
> 
> Anyway, I have avoided to rename the definition, as from what I
> understand
> MT8365 has only one dither mod and that's called "DITHER", not
> "DITHER0"...
> ...but I've added the suffix to the array assignment, as that's what
> we have
> in the enumeration.
> 
> I think that #define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER should be kept as-
> is.
> 
> Also... this commit is not fixing anything, as it was already working
> before,
> so the Fixes tag shouldn't be present.
> 
> Regards,
> Angelo
> 
> > ---
> >   drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c | 4 ++--
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > index fa8e0ba38803..3b25fd6b91aa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
> >   #define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_CCORR		13
> >   #define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_AAL		14
> >   #define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_GAMMA		15
> > -#define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER		16
> > +#define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER0		16
> >   #define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DSI0		17
> >   #define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_PWM0		20
> >   #define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DPI0		22
> > @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ static const unsigned int
> > mt8365_mutex_mod[DDP_COMPONENT_ID_MAX] = {
> >   	[DDP_COMPONENT_AAL0] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_AAL,
> >   	[DDP_COMPONENT_CCORR] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_CCORR,
> >   	[DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR0] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_COLOR0,
> > -	[DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER,
> > +	[DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER0] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER0,
> >   	[DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DPI0,
> >   	[DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DSI0,
> >   	[DDP_COMPONENT_GAMMA] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_GAMMA,
> 
>
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno June 23, 2022, 8:13 a.m. UTC | #3
Il 23/06/22 02:33, Jason-JH Lin ha scritto:
> Hi Angelo,
> 
> Yes, I missed that!
> So just forget about this patch and use yours.
> 
> Thanks for your help :)
> 

No worries, it happens...
Btw, you're welcome.

Cheers!

> Regard,
> Jason-JH.Lin
> 
> On Wed, 2022-06-22 at 15:31 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 22/06/22 15:19, Jason-JH.Lin ha scritto:
>>> Add suffix 0 to DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER for mt8395.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 141311b856d8 ("soc: mediatek: mutex: add MT8365 support")
>>> Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
>>
>>
>> Hello Jason-JH,
>>
>> you must've missed my commit, sent two days ago, which is doing the
>> same:
>>
>>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220620102454.131417-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com/T/#u
>>
>> Anyway, I have avoided to rename the definition, as from what I
>> understand
>> MT8365 has only one dither mod and that's called "DITHER", not
>> "DITHER0"...
>> ...but I've added the suffix to the array assignment, as that's what
>> we have
>> in the enumeration.
>>
>> I think that #define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER should be kept as-
>> is.
>>
>> Also... this commit is not fixing anything, as it was already working
>> before,
>> so the Fixes tag shouldn't be present.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Angelo
>>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
index fa8e0ba38803..3b25fd6b91aa 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ 
 #define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_CCORR		13
 #define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_AAL		14
 #define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_GAMMA		15
-#define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER		16
+#define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER0		16
 #define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DSI0		17
 #define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_PWM0		20
 #define MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DPI0		22
@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@  static const unsigned int mt8365_mutex_mod[DDP_COMPONENT_ID_MAX] = {
 	[DDP_COMPONENT_AAL0] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_AAL,
 	[DDP_COMPONENT_CCORR] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_CCORR,
 	[DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR0] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_COLOR0,
-	[DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER,
+	[DDP_COMPONENT_DITHER0] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DITHER0,
 	[DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DPI0,
 	[DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_DSI0,
 	[DDP_COMPONENT_GAMMA] = MT8365_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_GAMMA,