diff mbox series

[V3,1/2] dt-bindings: leds: add Broadcom's BCM63138 controller

Message ID 20211227145905.2905-1-zajec5@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [V3,1/2] dt-bindings: leds: add Broadcom's BCM63138 controller | expand

Commit Message

Rafał Miłecki Dec. 27, 2021, 2:59 p.m. UTC
From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>

Broadcom used 2 LEDs hardware blocks for their BCM63xx SoCs:
1. Older one (BCM6318, BCM6328, BCM6362, BCM63268, BCM6838)
2. Newer one (BCM6848, BCM6858, BCM63138, BCM63148, BCM63381, BCM68360)

The newer one was also later also used on BCM4908 SoC.

Old block is already documented in the leds-bcm6328.yaml. This binding
documents the new one which uses different registers & programming. It's
first used in BCM63138 thus the binding name.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
---
 .../bindings/leds/leds-bcm63138.yaml          | 95 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-bcm63138.yaml

Comments

Rafał Miłecki March 7, 2022, 6:27 a.m. UTC | #1
On 27.12.2021 15:59, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> 
> Broadcom used 2 LEDs hardware blocks for their BCM63xx SoCs:
> 1. Older one (BCM6318, BCM6328, BCM6362, BCM63268, BCM6838)
> 2. Newer one (BCM6848, BCM6858, BCM63138, BCM63148, BCM63381, BCM68360)
> 
> The newer one was also later also used on BCM4908 SoC.
> 
> Old block is already documented in the leds-bcm6328.yaml. This binding
> documents the new one which uses different registers & programming. It's
> first used in BCM63138 thus the binding name.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>

Ping?

Pavel: can I get this patchset finally accepted, please?
Rafał Miłecki March 27, 2022, 9:28 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Pavel,

On 7.03.2022 07:27, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 27.12.2021 15:59, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>>
>> Broadcom used 2 LEDs hardware blocks for their BCM63xx SoCs:
>> 1. Older one (BCM6318, BCM6328, BCM6362, BCM63268, BCM6838)
>> 2. Newer one (BCM6848, BCM6858, BCM63138, BCM63148, BCM63381, BCM68360)
>>
>> The newer one was also later also used on BCM4908 SoC.
>>
>> Old block is already documented in the leds-bcm6328.yaml. This binding
>> documents the new one which uses different registers & programming. It's
>> first used in BCM63138 thus the binding name.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> 
> Pavel: can I get this patchset finally accepted, please?

It has been 3 months now. I kindly pinged you in January, February and
March. Please let me know how can I get those patches accepted.
Rafał Miłecki April 27, 2022, 8:47 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Pavel,

On 27.03.2022 11:28, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 7.03.2022 07:27, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 27.12.2021 15:59, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>>>
>>> Broadcom used 2 LEDs hardware blocks for their BCM63xx SoCs:
>>> 1. Older one (BCM6318, BCM6328, BCM6362, BCM63268, BCM6838)
>>> 2. Newer one (BCM6848, BCM6858, BCM63138, BCM63148, BCM63381, BCM68360)
>>>
>>> The newer one was also later also used on BCM4908 SoC.
>>>
>>> Old block is already documented in the leds-bcm6328.yaml. This binding
>>> documents the new one which uses different registers & programming. It's
>>> first used in BCM63138 thus the binding name.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
>>
>> Pavel: can I get this patchset finally accepted, please?
> 
> It has been 3 months now. I kindly pinged you in January, February and
> March. Please let me know how can I get those patches accepted.

did you maybe have a chance to look at my patches?
Rafał Miłecki July 6, 2022, 12:54 p.m. UTC | #4
Hi Pavel,

On 27.04.2022 22:47, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 27.03.2022 11:28, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 7.03.2022 07:27, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> On 27.12.2021 15:59, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>>>>
>>>> Broadcom used 2 LEDs hardware blocks for their BCM63xx SoCs:
>>>> 1. Older one (BCM6318, BCM6328, BCM6362, BCM63268, BCM6838)
>>>> 2. Newer one (BCM6848, BCM6858, BCM63138, BCM63148, BCM63381, BCM68360)
>>>>
>>>> The newer one was also later also used on BCM4908 SoC.
>>>>
>>>> Old block is already documented in the leds-bcm6328.yaml. This binding
>>>> documents the new one which uses different registers & programming. It's
>>>> first used in BCM63138 thus the binding name.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Pavel: can I get this patchset finally accepted, please?
>>
>> It has been 3 months now. I kindly pinged you in January, February and
>> March. Please let me know how can I get those patches accepted.
> 
> did you maybe have a chance to look at my patches?

I'm asking to get this reviewed / accepted for half a year.
Pavel Machek July 17, 2022, 11:37 a.m. UTC | #5
Hi!

> Old block is already documented in the leds-bcm6328.yaml. This binding
> documents the new one which uses different registers & programming. It's
> first used in BCM63138 thus the binding name.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>

> +    properties:
> +      reg:
> +        maxItems: 1
> +        description: LED pin number
> +
> +      active-low:
> +        type: boolean
> +        description: Makes LED active low.

I'd expect both descriptions to end with ".", or none of them.

Best regards,
								Pavel
Pavel Machek July 17, 2022, 11:42 a.m. UTC | #6
Hi!

> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> 
> Broadcom used 2 LEDs hardware blocks for their BCM63xx SoCs:
> 1. Older one (BCM6318, BCM6328, BCM6362, BCM63268, BCM6838)
> 2. Newer one (BCM6848, BCM6858, BCM63138, BCM63148, BCM63381, BCM68360)
> 
> The newer one was also later also used on BCM4908 SoC.
> 
> Old block is already documented in the leds-bcm6328.yaml. This binding
> documents the new one which uses different registers & programming. It's
> first used in BCM63138 thus the binding name.

Thanks, applied, sorry for the delay. I would not mind additional
fixes as mentioned.
								Pavel
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-bcm63138.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-bcm63138.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..99cd4ba9b0ca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-bcm63138.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ 
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/leds/leds-bcm63138.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Broadcom's BCM63138 LEDs controller
+
+maintainers:
+  - Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
+
+description: |
+  This LEDs controller was first used on BCM63138 and later reused on BCM4908,
+  BCM6848, BCM6858, BCM63138, BCM63148, BCM63381 and BCM68360 SoCs.
+
+  It supports up to 32 LEDs that can be connected parallelly or serially. It
+  also includes limited support for hardware blinking.
+
+  Binding serially connected LEDs isn't documented yet.
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    oneOf:
+      - items:
+          - enum:
+              - brcm,bcm4908-leds
+              - brcm,bcm6848-leds
+              - brcm,bcm6858-leds
+              - brcm,bcm63148-leds
+              - brcm,bcm63381-leds
+              - brcm,bcm68360-leds
+          - const: brcm,bcm63138-leds
+      - const: brcm,bcm63138-leds
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  "#address-cells":
+    const: 1
+
+  "#size-cells":
+    const: 0
+
+patternProperties:
+  "^led@[a-f0-9]+$":
+    type: object
+
+    $ref: common.yaml#
+
+    properties:
+      reg:
+        maxItems: 1
+        description: LED pin number
+
+      active-low:
+        type: boolean
+        description: Makes LED active low.
+
+    required:
+      - reg
+
+    unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+required:
+  - reg
+  - "#address-cells"
+  - "#size-cells"
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #include <dt-bindings/leds/common.h>
+
+    leds@ff800800 {
+        compatible = "brcm,bcm4908-leds", "brcm,bcm63138-leds";
+        reg = <0xff800800 0xdc>;
+
+        #address-cells = <1>;
+        #size-cells = <0>;
+
+        led@0 {
+            reg = <0x0>;
+            function = LED_FUNCTION_POWER;
+            color = <LED_COLOR_ID_GREEN>;
+            default-state = "on";
+        };
+
+        led@3 {
+            reg = <0x3>;
+            function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
+            color = <LED_COLOR_ID_GREEN>;
+            active-low;
+        };
+    };