Message ID | 20220801013834.156015-4-andres@anarazel.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Awaiting Upstream |
Delegated to: | BPF |
Headers | show |
Series | tools: fix compilation failure caused by init_disassemble_info API changes | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/tree_selection | success | Not a local patch |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-1 | success | Logs for Kernel LATEST on ubuntu-latest with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-2 | success | Logs for Kernel LATEST on ubuntu-latest with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-3 | success | Logs for Kernel LATEST on z15 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-PR | success | PR summary |
Em Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 06:38:29PM -0700, Andres Freund escreveu: > binutils changed the signature of init_disassemble_info(), which now causes > compilation failures for tools/{perf,bpf}, e.g. on debian unstable. > Relevant binutils commit: > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=60a3da00bd5407f07 > > This commit introduces a wrapper for init_disassemble_info(), to avoid > spreading #ifdef DISASM_INIT_STYLED to a bunch of places. Subsequent > commits will use it to fix the build failures. > > It likely is worth adding a wrapper for disassember(), to avoid the already > existing DISASM_FOUR_ARGS_SIGNATURE ifdefery. > > Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> > Cc: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> > Cc: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> > Cc: Ben Hutchings <benh@debian.org> > Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220622181918.ykrs5rsnmx3og4sv@alap3.anarazel.de > Signed-off-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <benh@debian.org> So, who is the author of this patch? Ben? b4 complained about it: NOTE: some trailers ignored due to from/email mismatches: ! Trailer: Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <benh@debian.org> Msg From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> NOTE: Rerun with -S to apply them anyway If it is Ben, then we would need a: From: Ben Hutchings <benh@debian.org> At the beginning of the patch, right? - Arnaldo > --- > tools/include/tools/dis-asm-compat.h | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tools/include/tools/dis-asm-compat.h > > diff --git a/tools/include/tools/dis-asm-compat.h b/tools/include/tools/dis-asm-compat.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..70f331e23ed3 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tools/include/tools/dis-asm-compat.h > @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause */ > +#ifndef _TOOLS_DIS_ASM_COMPAT_H > +#define _TOOLS_DIS_ASM_COMPAT_H > + > +#include <stdio.h> > +#include <dis-asm.h> > + > +/* define types for older binutils version, to centralize ifdef'ery a bit */ > +#ifndef DISASM_INIT_STYLED > +enum disassembler_style {DISASSEMBLER_STYLE_NOT_EMPTY}; > +typedef int (*fprintf_styled_ftype) (void *, enum disassembler_style, const char*, ...); > +#endif > + > +/* > + * Trivial fprintf wrapper to be used as the fprintf_styled_func argument to > + * init_disassemble_info_compat() when normal fprintf suffices. > + */ > +static inline int fprintf_styled(void *out, > + enum disassembler_style style, > + const char *fmt, ...) > +{ > + va_list args; > + int r; > + > + (void)style; > + > + va_start(args, fmt); > + r = vfprintf(out, fmt, args); > + va_end(args); > + > + return r; > +} > + > +/* > + * Wrapper for init_disassemble_info() that hides version > + * differences. Depending on binutils version and architecture either > + * fprintf_func or fprintf_styled_func will be called. > + */ > +static inline void init_disassemble_info_compat(struct disassemble_info *info, > + void *stream, > + fprintf_ftype unstyled_func, > + fprintf_styled_ftype styled_func) > +{ > +#ifdef DISASM_INIT_STYLED > + init_disassemble_info(info, stream, > + unstyled_func, > + styled_func); > +#else > + (void)styled_func; > + init_disassemble_info(info, stream, > + unstyled_func); > +#endif > +} > + > +#endif /* _TOOLS_DIS_ASM_COMPAT_H */ > -- > 2.37.0.3.g30cc8d0f14
Hi, On 2022-08-01 15:05:00 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 06:38:29PM -0700, Andres Freund escreveu: > > binutils changed the signature of init_disassemble_info(), which now causes > > compilation failures for tools/{perf,bpf}, e.g. on debian unstable. > > Relevant binutils commit: > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=60a3da00bd5407f07 > > > > This commit introduces a wrapper for init_disassemble_info(), to avoid > > spreading #ifdef DISASM_INIT_STYLED to a bunch of places. Subsequent > > commits will use it to fix the build failures. > > > > It likely is worth adding a wrapper for disassember(), to avoid the already > > existing DISASM_FOUR_ARGS_SIGNATURE ifdefery. > > > > Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> > > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> > > Cc: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> > > Cc: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> > > Cc: Ben Hutchings <benh@debian.org> > > Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220622181918.ykrs5rsnmx3og4sv@alap3.anarazel.de > > Signed-off-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> > > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <benh@debian.org> > > So, who is the author of this patch? Ben? b4 complained about it: I squashed a fixup of Ben into my patch (moving the include in annotate.c into the HAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT section). I don't know what the proper procedure is for that - I'd asked in https://lore.kernel.org/20220715191641.go6xbmhic3kafcsc@awork3.anarazel.de > NOTE: some trailers ignored due to from/email mismatches: > ! Trailer: Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <benh@debian.org> > Msg From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> > NOTE: Rerun with -S to apply them anyway > > If it is Ben, then we would need a: > > From: Ben Hutchings <benh@debian.org> > > At the beginning of the patch, right? I don't know, I interact with the kernel processes too rarely... Greetings, Andres Freund
diff --git a/tools/include/tools/dis-asm-compat.h b/tools/include/tools/dis-asm-compat.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..70f331e23ed3 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/include/tools/dis-asm-compat.h @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause */ +#ifndef _TOOLS_DIS_ASM_COMPAT_H +#define _TOOLS_DIS_ASM_COMPAT_H + +#include <stdio.h> +#include <dis-asm.h> + +/* define types for older binutils version, to centralize ifdef'ery a bit */ +#ifndef DISASM_INIT_STYLED +enum disassembler_style {DISASSEMBLER_STYLE_NOT_EMPTY}; +typedef int (*fprintf_styled_ftype) (void *, enum disassembler_style, const char*, ...); +#endif + +/* + * Trivial fprintf wrapper to be used as the fprintf_styled_func argument to + * init_disassemble_info_compat() when normal fprintf suffices. + */ +static inline int fprintf_styled(void *out, + enum disassembler_style style, + const char *fmt, ...) +{ + va_list args; + int r; + + (void)style; + + va_start(args, fmt); + r = vfprintf(out, fmt, args); + va_end(args); + + return r; +} + +/* + * Wrapper for init_disassemble_info() that hides version + * differences. Depending on binutils version and architecture either + * fprintf_func or fprintf_styled_func will be called. + */ +static inline void init_disassemble_info_compat(struct disassemble_info *info, + void *stream, + fprintf_ftype unstyled_func, + fprintf_styled_ftype styled_func) +{ +#ifdef DISASM_INIT_STYLED + init_disassemble_info(info, stream, + unstyled_func, + styled_func); +#else + (void)styled_func; + init_disassemble_info(info, stream, + unstyled_func); +#endif +} + +#endif /* _TOOLS_DIS_ASM_COMPAT_H */