Message ID | 20220728115007.4376-1-dwagner@suse.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | [v1] qla2xxx: Allow nvme report port registration | expand |
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 01:50:07PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote: > Move the both ONLINE state check into qla2x00_update_fcport and call > both register port register functions. > > Currently, qla2x00_reg_remote_port and qla_nvme_register_remote check > the state if it is ONLINE. If it not, the state is set to ONLINE and > the function is executed. > > qla2x00_reg_remote_port is called before qla_nvme_register_remote and > hence qla_nvme_register_remote will always bail out and never register > a nvme remote port. > > Fixes: 6a45c8e137d4 ("scsi: qla2xxx: Fix disk failure to rediscover") > Cc: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com> > Cc: Quinn Tran <qutran@marvell.com> > Cc: Nilesh Javali <njavali@marvell.com> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de> I see the offending patch got reverted. FWIW, this patch works for me fine.
Hey Daniel, > On Jul 28, 2022, at 6:47 AM, Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 01:50:07PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote: >> Move the both ONLINE state check into qla2x00_update_fcport and call >> both register port register functions. >> >> Currently, qla2x00_reg_remote_port and qla_nvme_register_remote check >> the state if it is ONLINE. If it not, the state is set to ONLINE and >> the function is executed. >> >> qla2x00_reg_remote_port is called before qla_nvme_register_remote and >> hence qla_nvme_register_remote will always bail out and never register >> a nvme remote port. >> >> Fixes: 6a45c8e137d4 ("scsi: qla2xxx: Fix disk failure to rediscover") >> Cc: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com> >> Cc: Quinn Tran <qutran@marvell.com> >> Cc: Nilesh Javali <njavali@marvell.com> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de> > > I see the offending patch got reverted. FWIW, this patch works for me > fine. Do you see issue with reverted patch? I see no issues with the code change per say, just want to understand if you were seeing issue with the offending patch reverted as well? -- Himanshu Madhani Oracle Linux Engineering
On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 05:30:24PM +0000, Himanshu Madhani wrote: > Do you see issue with reverted patch? No, all is good again with 6a45c8e137d4 ("scsi: qla2xxx: Fix disk failure to rediscover") reverted. > I see no issues with the code change per say, just want to understand if > you were seeing issue with the offending patch reverted as well? I didn't see the revert in time hence I started to fix the code because I understood the patch actually fixes a race.
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c index 3f3417a3e891..71b804cfd808 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c @@ -5764,11 +5764,6 @@ qla2x00_reg_remote_port(scsi_qla_host_t *vha, fc_port_t *fcport) struct fc_rport *rport; unsigned long flags; - if (atomic_read(&fcport->state) == FCS_ONLINE) - return; - - qla2x00_set_fcport_state(fcport, FCS_ONLINE); - rport_ids.node_name = wwn_to_u64(fcport->node_name); rport_ids.port_name = wwn_to_u64(fcport->port_name); rport_ids.port_id = fcport->d_id.b.domain << 16 | @@ -5864,18 +5859,25 @@ qla2x00_update_fcport(scsi_qla_host_t *vha, fc_port_t *fcport) qla24xx_update_fcport_fcp_prio(vha, fcport); + if (atomic_read(&fcport->state) != FCS_ONLINE) { + qla2x00_set_fcport_state(fcport, FCS_ONLINE); + + switch (vha->host->active_mode) { + case MODE_INITIATOR: + case MODE_DUAL: + qla2x00_reg_remote_port(vha, fcport); + break; + default: + break; + } + + if (NVME_TARGET(vha->hw, fcport)) + qla_nvme_register_remote(vha, fcport); + } + switch (vha->host->active_mode) { - case MODE_INITIATOR: - qla2x00_reg_remote_port(vha, fcport); - break; case MODE_TARGET: - qla2x00_set_fcport_state(fcport, FCS_ONLINE); - if (!vha->vha_tgt.qla_tgt->tgt_stop && - !vha->vha_tgt.qla_tgt->tgt_stopped) - qlt_fc_port_added(vha, fcport); - break; case MODE_DUAL: - qla2x00_reg_remote_port(vha, fcport); if (!vha->vha_tgt.qla_tgt->tgt_stop && !vha->vha_tgt.qla_tgt->tgt_stopped) qlt_fc_port_added(vha, fcport); @@ -5884,9 +5886,6 @@ qla2x00_update_fcport(scsi_qla_host_t *vha, fc_port_t *fcport) break; } - if (NVME_TARGET(vha->hw, fcport)) - qla_nvme_register_remote(vha, fcport); - if (IS_IIDMA_CAPABLE(vha->hw) && vha->hw->flags.gpsc_supported) { if (fcport->id_changed) { fcport->id_changed = 0; diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c index 87c9404aa401..7450c3458be7 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c @@ -37,11 +37,6 @@ int qla_nvme_register_remote(struct scsi_qla_host *vha, struct fc_port *fcport) (fcport->nvme_flag & NVME_FLAG_REGISTERED)) return 0; - if (atomic_read(&fcport->state) == FCS_ONLINE) - return 0; - - qla2x00_set_fcport_state(fcport, FCS_ONLINE); - fcport->nvme_flag &= ~NVME_FLAG_RESETTING; memset(&req, 0, sizeof(struct nvme_fc_port_info));
Move the both ONLINE state check into qla2x00_update_fcport and call both register port register functions. Currently, qla2x00_reg_remote_port and qla_nvme_register_remote check the state if it is ONLINE. If it not, the state is set to ONLINE and the function is executed. qla2x00_reg_remote_port is called before qla_nvme_register_remote and hence qla_nvme_register_remote will always bail out and never register a nvme remote port. Fixes: 6a45c8e137d4 ("scsi: qla2xxx: Fix disk failure to rediscover") Cc: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com> Cc: Quinn Tran <qutran@marvell.com> Cc: Nilesh Javali <njavali@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de> --- drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_init.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++----------------- drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c | 5 ----- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)