Message ID | 20220815065102.74347-1-xu.panda@zte.com.cn (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2,linux-next] mm: memcontrol: Fix a typo in comment | expand |
On 8/15/2022 12:21 PM, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote: > From: xupanda <xu.panda@zte.com.cn> > > Fix a spelling mistake in comment. > > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> > Signed-off-by: xupanda <xu.panda@zte.com.cn> > Signed-off-by: CGEL ZTE <cgel.zte@gmail.com> > > --- > Change for v2: > - fix wrong title > --- > > mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c > index b69979c9ced5..4dddd8be320a 100644 > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c > @@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ static void invalidate_reclaim_iterators(struct mem_cgroup *dead_memcg) > } while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg))); > > /* > - * When cgruop1 non-hierarchy mode is used, > + * When cgroup1 non-hierarchy mode is used, Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com> -Mukesh > * parent_mem_cgroup() does not walk all the way up to the > * cgroup root (root_mem_cgroup). So we have to handle > * dead_memcg from cgroup root separately.
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index b69979c9ced5..4dddd8be320a 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ static void invalidate_reclaim_iterators(struct mem_cgroup *dead_memcg) } while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg))); /* - * When cgruop1 non-hierarchy mode is used, + * When cgroup1 non-hierarchy mode is used, * parent_mem_cgroup() does not walk all the way up to the * cgroup root (root_mem_cgroup). So we have to handle * dead_memcg from cgroup root separately.