Message ID | 20220825090242.12848-1-ihuguet@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | sfc: add support for PTP over IPv6 and 802.3 | expand |
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:02:39AM +0200, Íñigo Huguet wrote: > Most recent cards (8000 series and newer) had enough hardware support > for this, but it was not enabled in the driver. The transmission of PTP > packets over these protocols was already added in commit bd4a2697e5e2 > ("sfc: use hardware tx timestamps for more than PTP"), but receiving > them was already unsupported so synchronization didn't happen. You don't appear to Cc: the PTP maintainer. Andrew
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 6:17 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:02:39AM +0200, Íñigo Huguet wrote: > > Most recent cards (8000 series and newer) had enough hardware support > > for this, but it was not enabled in the driver. The transmission of PTP > > packets over these protocols was already added in commit bd4a2697e5e2 > > ("sfc: use hardware tx timestamps for more than PTP"), but receiving > > them was already unsupported so synchronization didn't happen. > > You don't appear to Cc: the PTP maintainer. > > Andrew > I didn't think about that, but looking at MAINTAINERS, there doesn't seem to be any. There are 2 maintainers for the drivers of the clock devices, but none for anything related to the network protocol...
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 08:58:31AM +0200, Íñigo Huguet wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 6:17 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:02:39AM +0200, Íñigo Huguet wrote: > > > Most recent cards (8000 series and newer) had enough hardware support > > > for this, but it was not enabled in the driver. The transmission of PTP > > > packets over these protocols was already added in commit bd4a2697e5e2 > > > ("sfc: use hardware tx timestamps for more than PTP"), but receiving > > > them was already unsupported so synchronization didn't happen. > > > > You don't appear to Cc: the PTP maintainer. > > > > Andrew > > > > I didn't think about that, but looking at MAINTAINERS, there doesn't > seem to be any. There are 2 maintainers for the drivers of the clock > devices, but none for anything related to the network protocol... PTP HARDWARE CLOCK SUPPORT M: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> L: netdev@vger.kernel.org S: Maintained W: http://linuxptp.sourceforge.net/ F: Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-ptp F: Documentation/driver-api/ptp.rst F: drivers/net/phy/dp83640* F: drivers/ptp/* F: include/linux/ptp_cl* I assume you are using linuxptp with this? Andrew
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 2:52 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 08:58:31AM +0200, Íñigo Huguet wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 6:17 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:02:39AM +0200, Íñigo Huguet wrote: > > > > Most recent cards (8000 series and newer) had enough hardware support > > > > for this, but it was not enabled in the driver. The transmission of PTP > > > > packets over these protocols was already added in commit bd4a2697e5e2 > > > > ("sfc: use hardware tx timestamps for more than PTP"), but receiving > > > > them was already unsupported so synchronization didn't happen. > > > > > > You don't appear to Cc: the PTP maintainer. > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > I didn't think about that, but looking at MAINTAINERS, there doesn't > > seem to be any. There are 2 maintainers for the drivers of the clock > > devices, but none for anything related to the network protocol... > > PTP HARDWARE CLOCK SUPPORT > M: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> > L: netdev@vger.kernel.org > S: Maintained > W: http://linuxptp.sourceforge.net/ > F: Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-ptp > F: Documentation/driver-api/ptp.rst > F: drivers/net/phy/dp83640* > F: drivers/ptp/* > F: include/linux/ptp_cl* > > I assume you are using linuxptp with this? > > Andrew > I'm still not sure if this falls under his responsibility because it doesn't affect the part of the clock device, but in any case it doesn't hurt to CC him as you suggest. Thanks! Richard, missed to CC you in this patch series, just in case it's of your interest.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 09:09:48AM +0200, Íñigo Huguet wrote: > Richard, missed to CC you in this patch series, just in case it's of > your interest. I do appreciate being on CC for anything PTP related. Thanks, Richard
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 07:38:36AM -0700, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 09:09:48AM +0200, Íñigo Huguet wrote: > > Richard, missed to CC you in this patch series, just in case it's of > > your interest. > > I do appreciate being on CC for anything PTP related. Russell King had the issue he was being missed on a lot of PHYLINK patches. He updated the MAINTAINERS entry with: K: phylink\.h|struct\s+phylink|\.phylink|>phylink_|phylink_(autoneg|clear|connect|create|destroy|disconnect|ethtool|helper|mac|mii|of|set|start|stop|test|validate) Maybe you could add some sort of regex for common ptp functions and structures? Andrew
On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 18:15:16 +0200 Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 07:38:36AM -0700, Richard Cochran wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 09:09:48AM +0200, Íñigo Huguet wrote: > > > Richard, missed to CC you in this patch series, just in case it's of > > > your interest. > > > > I do appreciate being on CC for anything PTP related. > > Russell King had the issue he was being missed on a lot of PHYLINK > patches. He updated the MAINTAINERS entry with: > > K: phylink\.h|struct\s+phylink|\.phylink|>phylink_|phylink_(autoneg|clear|connect|create|destroy|disconnect|ethtool|helper|mac|mii|of|set|start|stop|test|validate) > > Maybe you could add some sort of regex for common ptp functions and structures? +1