| Message ID | 20220901133505.2510834-9-yi.zhang@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | fs/buffer: remove ll_rw_block() | expand |
On Thu 01-09-22 21:34:59, Zhang Yi wrote: > ll_rw_block() is not safe for the sync read path because it cannot > guarantee that submitting read IO if the buffer has been locked. We > could get false positive EIO after wait_on_buffer() if the buffer has > been locked by others. So stop using ll_rw_block() in ocfs2. > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Looks good to me. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Honza > --- > fs/ocfs2/aops.c | 2 +- > fs/ocfs2/super.c | 4 +--- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c > index af4157f61927..1d65f6ef00ca 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c > @@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ int ocfs2_map_page_blocks(struct page *page, u64 *p_blkno, > !buffer_new(bh) && > ocfs2_should_read_blk(inode, page, block_start) && > (block_start < from || block_end > to)) { > - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, &bh); > + bh_read_nowait(bh, 0); > *wait_bh++=bh; > } > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/super.c b/fs/ocfs2/super.c > index e2cc9eec287c..26b4c2bfee49 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/super.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/super.c > @@ -1764,9 +1764,7 @@ static int ocfs2_get_sector(struct super_block *sb, > if (!buffer_dirty(*bh)) > clear_buffer_uptodate(*bh); > unlock_buffer(*bh); > - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, bh); > - wait_on_buffer(*bh); > - if (!buffer_uptodate(*bh)) { > + if (bh_read(*bh, 0) < 0) { > mlog_errno(-EIO); > brelse(*bh); > *bh = NULL; > -- > 2.31.1 >
Looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
On 9/1/22 9:34 PM, Zhang Yi via Ocfs2-devel wrote: > ll_rw_block() is not safe for the sync read path because it cannot > guarantee that submitting read IO if the buffer has been locked. We > could get false positive EIO after wait_on_buffer() if the buffer has > been locked by others. So stop using ll_rw_block() in ocfs2. > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> > --- > fs/ocfs2/aops.c | 2 +- > fs/ocfs2/super.c | 4 +--- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c > index af4157f61927..1d65f6ef00ca 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c > @@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ int ocfs2_map_page_blocks(struct page *page, u64 *p_blkno, > !buffer_new(bh) && > ocfs2_should_read_blk(inode, page, block_start) && > (block_start < from || block_end > to)) { > - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, &bh); > + bh_read_nowait(bh, 0); > *wait_bh++=bh; > } > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/super.c b/fs/ocfs2/super.c > index e2cc9eec287c..26b4c2bfee49 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/super.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/super.c > @@ -1764,9 +1764,7 @@ static int ocfs2_get_sector(struct super_block *sb, > if (!buffer_dirty(*bh)) > clear_buffer_uptodate(*bh); > unlock_buffer(*bh); > - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, bh); > - wait_on_buffer(*bh); > - if (!buffer_uptodate(*bh)) { > + if (bh_read(*bh, 0) < 0) { > mlog_errno(-EIO); > brelse(*bh); > *bh = NULL;
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c index af4157f61927..1d65f6ef00ca 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/aops.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/aops.c @@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ int ocfs2_map_page_blocks(struct page *page, u64 *p_blkno, !buffer_new(bh) && ocfs2_should_read_blk(inode, page, block_start) && (block_start < from || block_end > to)) { - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, &bh); + bh_read_nowait(bh, 0); *wait_bh++=bh; } diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/super.c b/fs/ocfs2/super.c index e2cc9eec287c..26b4c2bfee49 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/super.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/super.c @@ -1764,9 +1764,7 @@ static int ocfs2_get_sector(struct super_block *sb, if (!buffer_dirty(*bh)) clear_buffer_uptodate(*bh); unlock_buffer(*bh); - ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, bh); - wait_on_buffer(*bh); - if (!buffer_uptodate(*bh)) { + if (bh_read(*bh, 0) < 0) { mlog_errno(-EIO); brelse(*bh); *bh = NULL;
ll_rw_block() is not safe for the sync read path because it cannot guarantee that submitting read IO if the buffer has been locked. We could get false positive EIO after wait_on_buffer() if the buffer has been locked by others. So stop using ll_rw_block() in ocfs2. Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com> --- fs/ocfs2/aops.c | 2 +- fs/ocfs2/super.c | 4 +--- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)