Message ID | 20220906063450.3698671-1-mattias.forsblad@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: qca8k: rmon: Add RMU support | expand |
On Tue, 6 Sep 2022 08:34:44 +0200 Mattias Forsblad <mattias.forsblad@gmail.com> wrote: > The Marvell SOHO switches have the ability to receive and transmit > Remote Management Frames (Frame2Reg) to the CPU through the > attached network interface. > This is handled by the Remote Management Unit (RMU) in the switch > These frames can contain different payloads: > single switch register read and writes, daisy chained switch > register read and writes, RMON/MIB dump/dump clear and ATU dump. > The dump functions are very costly over MDIO but it's > only a couple of network packets via the RMU. > > Next step could be to implement ATU dump. > We've found that the gain to use RMU for single register > read and writes is neglible. > > qca8k > ===== > There's a newly introduced convenience function for sending > and waiting for frames. Changes have been made for the qca8k > driver to use this. Please test for regressions. > > RFC -> v1: > - Track master interface availability. > - Validate destination MAC for incoming frames. > - Rate limit outputs. > - Cleanup setup function validating upstream port on switch. > - Fix return values when setting up RMU. > - Prefix defines correctly. > - Fix aligned accesses. > - Validate that switch exists for incoming frames. > - Split RMON stats function. > > v1 -> v2: > - Remove unused variable. > > v2 -> v3: > - Rewrite after feedback. Use tagger_data to handle > frames more like qca8k. > - qca8k: Change to use convenience functions introduced. > Requesting test of this. > > v3 -> v4: > - Separated patches more granular. > > Regards, > Mattias Forsblad Nitpick: in subject, the order of components separated by ':' infers hierarchy, so your subject net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: qca8k: rmon: Add RMU support means: component net subcompoment dsa subcomponent mv88e6xxx subcomponent qca8k (this is wrong since qca8k is separate driver, not a subcomponent of mv88e6xxx) You should use ',' to separate mv88e6xxx and qca8k, something like net: dsa: mv88e6xxx, qca8k: rmon: Add RMU support Since this is not an actual patch, but instead a cover letter only, it's not a problem (at least not for me). But please try not to do it in actual patches. Marek
On 2022-09-06 10:07, Marek BehĂșn wrote: > Nitpick: in subject, the order of components separated by ':' infers > hierarchy, so your subject > net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: qca8k: rmon: Add RMU support > means: > component net > subcompoment dsa > subcomponent mv88e6xxx > subcomponent qca8k (this is wrong since qca8k is separate > driver, not a subcomponent of mv88e6xxx) > > You should use ',' to separate mv88e6xxx and qca8k, something like > net: dsa: mv88e6xxx, qca8k: rmon: Add RMU support > > Since this is not an actual patch, but instead a cover letter only, > it's not a problem (at least not for me). But please try not to do it > in actual patches. > > Marek Ah, ok I see your point. Thanks. /Mattias