diff mbox series

dt-bindings: pinctrl: stm32: add missing entries for gpio subnodes

Message ID 20220913074639.31932-1-alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series dt-bindings: pinctrl: stm32: add missing entries for gpio subnodes | expand

Commit Message

Alexandre TORGUE Sept. 13, 2022, 7:46 a.m. UTC
Add "interrupt-controller" and gpio-line-names to gpio subnodes in order to
fix dtb validation.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>

Comments

Rob Herring (Arm) Sept. 13, 2022, 3:55 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 09:46:39 +0200, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
> Add "interrupt-controller" and gpio-line-names to gpio subnodes in order to
> fix dtb validation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
> 

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Krzysztof Kozlowski Sept. 19, 2022, 11:32 a.m. UTC | #2
On 13/09/2022 09:46, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
> Add "interrupt-controller" and gpio-line-names to gpio subnodes in order to
> fix dtb validation.

Rebase your patch on recent Linux kernel and use get_maintainers.pl.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
> index d35dcc4f0242..92582cccbb1b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
> @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ patternProperties:
>        '#gpio-cells':
>          const: 2
>  
> +      interrupt-controller: true
> +      '#interrupt-cells':
> +        const: 2
> +
>        reg:
>          maxItems: 1
>        clocks:
> @@ -80,6 +84,8 @@ patternProperties:
>          minimum: 1
>          maximum: 16
>  
> +      gpio-line-names: true

maxItems?


Best regards,
Krzysztof
Alexandre TORGUE Sept. 23, 2022, 8:29 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Krzysztof

On 9/19/22 13:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/09/2022 09:46, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>> Add "interrupt-controller" and gpio-line-names to gpio subnodes in order to
>> fix dtb validation.
> 
> Rebase your patch on recent Linux kernel and use get_maintainers.pl.

I did it on 6.0-rc5 but yes I used your kernel.org address instead of 
linaro ones. Sorry.

> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
>> index d35dcc4f0242..92582cccbb1b 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
>> @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ patternProperties:
>>         '#gpio-cells':
>>           const: 2
>>   
>> +      interrupt-controller: true
>> +      '#interrupt-cells':
>> +        const: 2
>> +
>>         reg:
>>           maxItems: 1
>>         clocks:
>> @@ -80,6 +84,8 @@ patternProperties:
>>           minimum: 1
>>           maximum: 16
>>   
>> +      gpio-line-names: true
> 
> maxItems?

Generic question, Is it mandatory to add maxItems information for all 
entries ?

For sure I'll send a v2 with it.

Alex

> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Krzysztof Kozlowski Sept. 23, 2022, 9:21 a.m. UTC | #4
On 23/09/2022 10:29, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof
> 
> On 9/19/22 13:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 13/09/2022 09:46, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>>> Add "interrupt-controller" and gpio-line-names to gpio subnodes in order to
>>> fix dtb validation.
>>
>> Rebase your patch on recent Linux kernel and use get_maintainers.pl.
> 
> I did it on 6.0-rc5 but yes I used your kernel.org address instead of 
> linaro ones. Sorry.
> 
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
>>> index d35dcc4f0242..92582cccbb1b 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
>>> @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ patternProperties:
>>>         '#gpio-cells':
>>>           const: 2
>>>   
>>> +      interrupt-controller: true
>>> +      '#interrupt-cells':
>>> +        const: 2
>>> +
>>>         reg:
>>>           maxItems: 1
>>>         clocks:
>>> @@ -80,6 +84,8 @@ patternProperties:
>>>           minimum: 1
>>>           maximum: 16
>>>   
>>> +      gpio-line-names: true
>>
>> maxItems?
> 
> Generic question, Is it mandatory to add maxItems information for all 
> entries ?

It's not mandatory for all. For some it is recommended, for some it does
not make sense. Here it's quite easy to add and it will validate the
entry. Any reason not to add it?

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Alexandre TORGUE Sept. 26, 2022, 10:32 a.m. UTC | #5
On 9/23/22 11:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/09/2022 10:29, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof
>>
>> On 9/19/22 13:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 13/09/2022 09:46, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>>>> Add "interrupt-controller" and gpio-line-names to gpio subnodes in order to
>>>> fix dtb validation.
>>>
>>> Rebase your patch on recent Linux kernel and use get_maintainers.pl.
>>
>> I did it on 6.0-rc5 but yes I used your kernel.org address instead of
>> linaro ones. Sorry.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
>>>> index d35dcc4f0242..92582cccbb1b 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
>>>> @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ patternProperties:
>>>>          '#gpio-cells':
>>>>            const: 2
>>>>    
>>>> +      interrupt-controller: true
>>>> +      '#interrupt-cells':
>>>> +        const: 2
>>>> +
>>>>          reg:
>>>>            maxItems: 1
>>>>          clocks:
>>>> @@ -80,6 +84,8 @@ patternProperties:
>>>>            minimum: 1
>>>>            maximum: 16
>>>>    
>>>> +      gpio-line-names: true
>>>
>>> maxItems?
>>
>> Generic question, Is it mandatory to add maxItems information for all
>> entries ?
> 
> It's not mandatory for all. For some it is recommended, for some it does
> not make sense. Here it's quite easy to add and it will validate the
> entry. Any reason not to add it?

Ok understood. To be honest, no reasons to not add it.

cheers
alex

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
index d35dcc4f0242..92582cccbb1b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
@@ -65,6 +65,10 @@  patternProperties:
       '#gpio-cells':
         const: 2
 
+      interrupt-controller: true
+      '#interrupt-cells':
+        const: 2
+
       reg:
         maxItems: 1
       clocks:
@@ -80,6 +84,8 @@  patternProperties:
         minimum: 1
         maximum: 16
 
+      gpio-line-names: true
+
       st,bank-name:
         description:
           Should be a name string for this bank as specified in the datasheet.