diff mbox series

[RESEND,V5,6/7] ublk_drv: add START_USER_RECOVERY and END_USER_RECOVERY support

Message ID 20220923061505.52007-7-ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series ublk_drv: add USER_RECOVERY support | expand

Commit Message

Ziyang Zhang Sept. 23, 2022, 6:15 a.m. UTC
START_USER_RECOVERY and END_USER_RECOVERY are two new control commands
to support user recovery feature.

After a crash, user should send START_USER_RECOVERY, it will:
(1) check if (a)current ublk_device is UBLK_S_DEV_QUIESCED which was
    set by quiesce_work and (b)chardev is released
(2) reinit all ubqs, including:
    (a) put the task_struct and reset ->ubq_daemon to NULL.
    (b) reset all ublk_io.
(3) reset ub->mm to NULL.

Then, user should start a new process and send FETCH_REQ on each
ubq_daemon.

Finally, user should send END_USER_RECOVERY, it will:
(1) wait for all new ubq_daemons getting ready.
(2) update ublksrv_pid
(3) unquiesce the request queue and expect incoming ublk_queue_rq()
(4) convert ub's state to UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE

Note: we can handle STOP_DEV between START_USER_RECOVERY and
END_USER_RECOVERY. This is helpful to users who cannot start new process
after sending START_USER_RECOVERY ctrl-cmd.

Signed-off-by: ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 drivers/block/ublk_drv.c      | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h |   3 +-
 2 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Ziyang Zhang Sept. 23, 2022, 6:34 a.m. UTC | #1
On 2022/9/23 14:15, ZiyangZhang wrote:
> START_USER_RECOVERY and END_USER_RECOVERY are two new control commands
> to support user recovery feature.
> 
> After a crash, user should send START_USER_RECOVERY, it will:
> (1) check if (a)current ublk_device is UBLK_S_DEV_QUIESCED which was
>     set by quiesce_work and (b)chardev is released
> (2) reinit all ubqs, including:
>     (a) put the task_struct and reset ->ubq_daemon to NULL.
>     (b) reset all ublk_io.
> (3) reset ub->mm to NULL.
> 
> Then, user should start a new process and send FETCH_REQ on each
> ubq_daemon.
> 
> Finally, user should send END_USER_RECOVERY, it will:
> (1) wait for all new ubq_daemons getting ready.
> (2) update ublksrv_pid
> (3) unquiesce the request queue and expect incoming ublk_queue_rq()
> (4) convert ub's state to UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE
> 
> Note: we can handle STOP_DEV between START_USER_RECOVERY and
> END_USER_RECOVERY. This is helpful to users who cannot start new process
> after sending START_USER_RECOVERY ctrl-cmd.
> 
> Signed-off-by: ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>

Let me explain why we still need two ctrl-cmds: START_USER_RECOVERY
and END_USER_RECOVERY:

(1) They are easy to use and understand. Just like calling
    a)ADD_DEV, b)start daemon c)START_DEV, we can recover a device by
    a)START_USER_RECOVERY b)start new daemon c)END_USER_RECOVERY.
    IMO, START_USER_RECOVERY can guide user whether to start a new daemon.
    Without it, user must directly start a new daemon. He may fail here
    because /dev/ublkc* is not released. So a retry is necessary here.
    But I think that let the user retry by sending START_USER_RECOVERY
    instead of opening /dev/ublkc* is more reasonable.

(2) Handling put_task_struct(ubq_daemon) is hard in ublk_ch_release().
    Assume all ioucmds have been issued back to userspace and a crash happens,
    ublk_ch_release() can be called immediately here and ubq_daemon is
    freed. But monoitor_work may be running now. Dealing with UAF on
    ubq_daemon in monitor_work may be difficult. But handling
    put_task_struct(ubq_daemon) in START_USER_RECOVERY solves the problem
    because monitor_work is sure to be canceled. Besides, here is no race
    with ublk_deinit_queue() since it cannot be called if ub's state is
    QUIESCED.

Regards,
Zhang
Ming Lei Sept. 23, 2022, 1:50 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 02:15:04PM +0800, ZiyangZhang wrote:
> START_USER_RECOVERY and END_USER_RECOVERY are two new control commands
> to support user recovery feature.
> 
> After a crash, user should send START_USER_RECOVERY, it will:
> (1) check if (a)current ublk_device is UBLK_S_DEV_QUIESCED which was
>     set by quiesce_work and (b)chardev is released
> (2) reinit all ubqs, including:
>     (a) put the task_struct and reset ->ubq_daemon to NULL.
>     (b) reset all ublk_io.
> (3) reset ub->mm to NULL.
> 
> Then, user should start a new process and send FETCH_REQ on each
> ubq_daemon.
> 
> Finally, user should send END_USER_RECOVERY, it will:
> (1) wait for all new ubq_daemons getting ready.
> (2) update ublksrv_pid
> (3) unquiesce the request queue and expect incoming ublk_queue_rq()
> (4) convert ub's state to UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE
> 
> Note: we can handle STOP_DEV between START_USER_RECOVERY and
> END_USER_RECOVERY. This is helpful to users who cannot start new process
> after sending START_USER_RECOVERY ctrl-cmd.
> 
> Signed-off-by: ZiyangZhang <ZiyangZhang@linux.alibaba.com>

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Ming
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
index 3d7b067e0b99..f31d80f66fd6 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
@@ -1862,6 +1862,116 @@  static int ublk_ctrl_set_params(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static void ublk_queue_reinit(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!(ubq->ubq_daemon && ubq_daemon_is_dying(ubq)));
+	/* All old ioucmds have to be completed */
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(ubq->nr_io_ready);
+	/* old daemon is PF_EXITING, put it now */
+	put_task_struct(ubq->ubq_daemon);
+	/* We have to reset it to NULL, otherwise ub won't accept new FETCH_REQ */
+	ubq->ubq_daemon = NULL;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ubq->q_depth; i++) {
+		struct ublk_io *io = &ubq->ios[i];
+
+		/* forget everything now and be ready for new FETCH_REQ */
+		io->flags = 0;
+		io->cmd = NULL;
+		io->addr = 0;
+	}
+}
+
+static int ublk_ctrl_start_recovery(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
+{
+	struct ublksrv_ctrl_cmd *header = (struct ublksrv_ctrl_cmd *)cmd->cmd;
+	struct ublk_device *ub;
+	int ret = -EINVAL;
+	int i;
+
+	ub = ublk_get_device_from_id(header->dev_id);
+	if (!ub)
+		return ret;
+
+	mutex_lock(&ub->mutex);
+	if (!ublk_can_use_recovery(ub))
+		goto out_unlock;
+	/*
+	 * START_RECOVERY is only allowd after:
+	 *
+	 * (1) UB_STATE_OPEN is not set, which means the dying process is exited
+	 *     and related io_uring ctx is freed so file struct of /dev/ublkcX is
+	 *     released.
+	 *
+	 * (2) UBLK_S_DEV_QUIESCED is set, which means the quiesce_work:
+	 *     (a)has quiesced request queue
+	 *     (b)has requeued every inflight rqs whose io_flags is ACTIVE
+	 *     (c)has requeued/aborted every inflight rqs whose io_flags is NOT ACTIVE
+	 *     (d)has completed/camceled all ioucmds owned by ther dying process
+	 */
+	if (test_bit(UB_STATE_OPEN, &ub->state) ||
+			ub->dev_info.state != UBLK_S_DEV_QUIESCED) {
+		ret = -EBUSY;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+	pr_devel("%s: start recovery for dev id %d.\n", __func__, header->dev_id);
+	for (i = 0; i < ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues; i++)
+		ublk_queue_reinit(ub, ublk_get_queue(ub, i));
+	/* set to NULL, otherwise new ubq_daemon cannot mmap the io_cmd_buf */
+	ub->mm = NULL;
+	ub->nr_queues_ready = 0;
+	init_completion(&ub->completion);
+	ret = 0;
+ out_unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&ub->mutex);
+	ublk_put_device(ub);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int ublk_ctrl_end_recovery(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
+{
+	struct ublksrv_ctrl_cmd *header = (struct ublksrv_ctrl_cmd *)cmd->cmd;
+	int ublksrv_pid = (int)header->data[0];
+	struct ublk_device *ub;
+	int ret = -EINVAL;
+
+	ub = ublk_get_device_from_id(header->dev_id);
+	if (!ub)
+		return ret;
+
+	pr_devel("%s: Waiting for new ubq_daemons(nr: %d) are ready, dev id %d...\n",
+			__func__, ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues, header->dev_id);
+	/* wait until new ubq_daemon sending all FETCH_REQ */
+	wait_for_completion_interruptible(&ub->completion);
+	pr_devel("%s: All new ubq_daemons(nr: %d) are ready, dev id %d\n",
+			__func__, ub->dev_info.nr_hw_queues, header->dev_id);
+
+	mutex_lock(&ub->mutex);
+	if (!ublk_can_use_recovery(ub))
+		goto out_unlock;
+
+	if (ub->dev_info.state != UBLK_S_DEV_QUIESCED) {
+		ret = -EBUSY;
+		goto out_unlock;
+	}
+	ub->dev_info.ublksrv_pid = ublksrv_pid;
+	pr_devel("%s: new ublksrv_pid %d, dev id %d\n",
+			__func__, ublksrv_pid, header->dev_id);
+	blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(ub->ub_disk->queue);
+	pr_devel("%s: queue unquiesced, dev id %d.\n",
+			__func__, header->dev_id);
+	blk_mq_kick_requeue_list(ub->ub_disk->queue);
+	ub->dev_info.state = UBLK_S_DEV_LIVE;
+	schedule_delayed_work(&ub->monitor_work, UBLK_DAEMON_MONITOR_PERIOD);
+	ret = 0;
+ out_unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&ub->mutex);
+	ublk_put_device(ub);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int ublk_ctrl_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
 		unsigned int issue_flags)
 {
@@ -1903,6 +2013,12 @@  static int ublk_ctrl_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
 	case UBLK_CMD_SET_PARAMS:
 		ret = ublk_ctrl_set_params(cmd);
 		break;
+	case UBLK_CMD_START_USER_RECOVERY:
+		ret = ublk_ctrl_start_recovery(cmd);
+		break;
+	case UBLK_CMD_END_USER_RECOVERY:
+		ret = ublk_ctrl_end_recovery(cmd);
+		break;
 	default:
 		break;
 	}
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h b/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h
index 332370628757..8f88e3a29998 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/ublk_cmd.h
@@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ 
 #define	UBLK_CMD_STOP_DEV	0x07
 #define	UBLK_CMD_SET_PARAMS	0x08
 #define	UBLK_CMD_GET_PARAMS	0x09
-
+#define	UBLK_CMD_START_USER_RECOVERY	0x10
+#define	UBLK_CMD_END_USER_RECOVERY	0x11
 /*
  * IO commands, issued by ublk server, and handled by ublk driver.
  *