Message ID | 20220926071100.76379-1-xhao@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [v1,1/2] mm/damon: rename sz_damon_region to damon_region_size | expand |
On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:10:59 +0800 Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > Here, i rename sz_damon_region() to damon_region_size(), and move it to > "include/linux/damon.h", because in many places, we can to use this func. Good idea. > > Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com> > --- > include/linux/damon.h | 1 + > mm/damon/core.c | 6 +++--- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/damon.h b/include/linux/damon.h > index ed5470f50bab..21f4bfd0f41f 100644 > --- a/include/linux/damon.h > +++ b/include/linux/damon.h > @@ -524,6 +524,7 @@ void damon_add_region(struct damon_region *r, struct damon_target *t); > void damon_destroy_region(struct damon_region *r, struct damon_target *t); > int damon_set_regions(struct damon_target *t, struct damon_addr_range *ranges, > unsigned int nr_ranges); > +unsigned long damon_region_size(struct damon_region *r); This name looks good enough, but I'd like to suggest damon_sz_region(). What do you think? Also, I'd like to keep this function 'static inline' and put the definition just after that of 'damon_first_region()'. Thanks, SJ > > struct damos *damon_new_scheme(struct damos_access_pattern *pattern, > enum damos_action action, struct damos_quota *quota, > diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c > index 4de8c7c52979..74ab45b2c2f1 100644 > --- a/mm/damon/core.c > +++ b/mm/damon/core.c > @@ -864,7 +864,7 @@ static void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c) > } > } > > -static inline unsigned long sz_damon_region(struct damon_region *r) > +unsigned long damon_region_size(struct damon_region *r) > { > return r->ar.end - r->ar.start; > } > @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ static inline unsigned long sz_damon_region(struct damon_region *r) > static void damon_merge_two_regions(struct damon_target *t, > struct damon_region *l, struct damon_region *r) > { > - unsigned long sz_l = sz_damon_region(l), sz_r = sz_damon_region(r); > + unsigned long sz_l = damon_region_size(l), sz_r = damon_region_size(r); > > l->nr_accesses = (l->nr_accesses * sz_l + r->nr_accesses * sz_r) / > (sz_l + sz_r); > @@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ static void damon_merge_regions_of(struct damon_target *t, unsigned int thres, > > if (prev && prev->ar.end == r->ar.start && > abs(prev->nr_accesses - r->nr_accesses) <= thres && > - sz_damon_region(prev) + sz_damon_region(r) <= sz_limit) > + damon_region_size(prev) + damon_region_size(r) <= sz_limit) > damon_merge_two_regions(t, prev, r); > else > prev = r; > -- > 2.31.0 >
在 2022/9/27 上午12:16, SeongJae Park 写道: > On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 15:10:59 +0800 Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > >> Here, i rename sz_damon_region() to damon_region_size(), and move it to >> "include/linux/damon.h", because in many places, we can to use this func. > Good idea. > >> Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com> >> --- >> include/linux/damon.h | 1 + >> mm/damon/core.c | 6 +++--- >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/damon.h b/include/linux/damon.h >> index ed5470f50bab..21f4bfd0f41f 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/damon.h >> +++ b/include/linux/damon.h >> @@ -524,6 +524,7 @@ void damon_add_region(struct damon_region *r, struct damon_target *t); >> void damon_destroy_region(struct damon_region *r, struct damon_target *t); >> int damon_set_regions(struct damon_target *t, struct damon_addr_range *ranges, >> unsigned int nr_ranges); >> +unsigned long damon_region_size(struct damon_region *r); > This name looks good enough, but I'd like to suggest damon_sz_region(). What > do you think? Yes, the fisrt i named damon_sz_region, but later i changed it to damon_region_size, so i will change it back. > > Also, I'd like to keep this function 'static inline' and put the definition > just after that of 'damon_first_region()'. Ok, thanks > > > Thanks, > SJ > >> struct damos *damon_new_scheme(struct damos_access_pattern *pattern, >> enum damos_action action, struct damos_quota *quota, >> diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c >> index 4de8c7c52979..74ab45b2c2f1 100644 >> --- a/mm/damon/core.c >> +++ b/mm/damon/core.c >> @@ -864,7 +864,7 @@ static void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c) >> } >> } >> >> -static inline unsigned long sz_damon_region(struct damon_region *r) >> +unsigned long damon_region_size(struct damon_region *r) >> { >> return r->ar.end - r->ar.start; >> } >> @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ static inline unsigned long sz_damon_region(struct damon_region *r) >> static void damon_merge_two_regions(struct damon_target *t, >> struct damon_region *l, struct damon_region *r) >> { >> - unsigned long sz_l = sz_damon_region(l), sz_r = sz_damon_region(r); >> + unsigned long sz_l = damon_region_size(l), sz_r = damon_region_size(r); >> >> l->nr_accesses = (l->nr_accesses * sz_l + r->nr_accesses * sz_r) / >> (sz_l + sz_r); >> @@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ static void damon_merge_regions_of(struct damon_target *t, unsigned int thres, >> >> if (prev && prev->ar.end == r->ar.start && >> abs(prev->nr_accesses - r->nr_accesses) <= thres && >> - sz_damon_region(prev) + sz_damon_region(r) <= sz_limit) >> + damon_region_size(prev) + damon_region_size(r) <= sz_limit) >> damon_merge_two_regions(t, prev, r); >> else >> prev = r; >> -- >> 2.31.0 >>
diff --git a/include/linux/damon.h b/include/linux/damon.h index ed5470f50bab..21f4bfd0f41f 100644 --- a/include/linux/damon.h +++ b/include/linux/damon.h @@ -524,6 +524,7 @@ void damon_add_region(struct damon_region *r, struct damon_target *t); void damon_destroy_region(struct damon_region *r, struct damon_target *t); int damon_set_regions(struct damon_target *t, struct damon_addr_range *ranges, unsigned int nr_ranges); +unsigned long damon_region_size(struct damon_region *r); struct damos *damon_new_scheme(struct damos_access_pattern *pattern, enum damos_action action, struct damos_quota *quota, diff --git a/mm/damon/core.c b/mm/damon/core.c index 4de8c7c52979..74ab45b2c2f1 100644 --- a/mm/damon/core.c +++ b/mm/damon/core.c @@ -864,7 +864,7 @@ static void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c) } } -static inline unsigned long sz_damon_region(struct damon_region *r) +unsigned long damon_region_size(struct damon_region *r) { return r->ar.end - r->ar.start; } @@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ static inline unsigned long sz_damon_region(struct damon_region *r) static void damon_merge_two_regions(struct damon_target *t, struct damon_region *l, struct damon_region *r) { - unsigned long sz_l = sz_damon_region(l), sz_r = sz_damon_region(r); + unsigned long sz_l = damon_region_size(l), sz_r = damon_region_size(r); l->nr_accesses = (l->nr_accesses * sz_l + r->nr_accesses * sz_r) / (sz_l + sz_r); @@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ static void damon_merge_regions_of(struct damon_target *t, unsigned int thres, if (prev && prev->ar.end == r->ar.start && abs(prev->nr_accesses - r->nr_accesses) <= thres && - sz_damon_region(prev) + sz_damon_region(r) <= sz_limit) + damon_region_size(prev) + damon_region_size(r) <= sz_limit) damon_merge_two_regions(t, prev, r); else prev = r;
Here, i rename sz_damon_region() to damon_region_size(), and move it to "include/linux/damon.h", because in many places, we can to use this func. Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com> --- include/linux/damon.h | 1 + mm/damon/core.c | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 2.31.0