mbox series

[v2,0/5] media: i2c: ov5645 driver enhancements

Message ID 20221014183459.181567-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series media: i2c: ov5645 driver enhancements | expand

Message

Lad, Prabhakar Oct. 14, 2022, 6:34 p.m. UTC
From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>

Hi All,

The main aim of this series is to add PM support to the sensor driver.

I had two more patches [0] and [1] which were for ov5645, so instead
sending them separately I have clubbed them as series.

v1-> v2
- patch #1 is infact a v3 [1] no changes
- patch #2 fixed review comments pointed by Sakari
- patch #3 [0] no changes 
- patches #4 and #5 are new

[0] https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/20220927202005.750621-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com/
[1] https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/20220919153540.178732-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com/

Cheers,
Prabhakar

Lad Prabhakar (5):
  media: dt-bindings: ov5645: Convert OV5645 binding to a schema
  media: i2c: ov5645: Use runtime PM
  media: i2c: ov5645: Drop empty comment
  media: i2c: ov5645: Return zero for s_stream(0)
  media: i2c: ov5645: Call ov5645_entity_init_cfg() before registering
    the subdev

 .../devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ov5645.txt  |  54 -------
 .../bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5645.yaml       | 104 ++++++++++++
 drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig                     |   2 +-
 drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c                    | 151 +++++++++---------
 4 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 133 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ov5645.txt
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ovti,ov5645.yaml

Comments

Lad, Prabhakar Oct. 14, 2022, 6:40 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Sakari,

On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 7:35 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
>
> Hi All,
>
> The main aim of this series is to add PM support to the sensor driver.
>
> I had two more patches [0] and [1] which were for ov5645, so instead
> sending them separately I have clubbed them as series.
>
> v1-> v2
> - patch #1 is infact a v3 [1] no changes
> - patch #2 fixed review comments pointed by Sakari
> - patch #3 [0] no changes
> - patches #4 and #5 are new
>
> [0] https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/20220927202005.750621-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com/
> [1] https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/20220919153540.178732-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com/
>
> Cheers,
> Prabhakar
>
> Lad Prabhakar (5):
>   media: dt-bindings: ov5645: Convert OV5645 binding to a schema
>   media: i2c: ov5645: Use runtime PM
>   media: i2c: ov5645: Drop empty comment
>   media: i2c: ov5645: Return zero for s_stream(0)
>   media: i2c: ov5645: Call ov5645_entity_init_cfg() before registering
>     the subdev
>
After sending this series I realized I had an additional patch [0] for
ov5645 which I should have tagged along with the series. Can you
please pick [0] while reviewing this series.

[0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/20220919143350.176746-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com/

Cheers,
Prabhakar