Message ID | 166631003537.1167078.9373680312035292395.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 24f0692bfd41fd207d99c993a5785c3426762046 |
Headers | show |
Series | ACPI: NUMA: Add CXL CFMWS 'nodes' to the possible nodes set | expand |
On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 16:54 -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > The ACPI CEDT.CFMWS indicates a range of possible address where new CXL > regions can appear. Each range is associated with a QTG id (QoS > Throttling Group id). For each range + QTG pair that is not covered by a proximity > domain in the SRAT, Linux creates a new NUMA node. However, the commit > that added the new ranges missed updating the node_possible mask which > causes memory_group_register() to fail. Add the new nodes to the > nodes_possible mask. > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> > Fixes: fd49f99c1809 ("ACPI: NUMA: Add a node and memblk for each CFMWS not in SRAT") > Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > Reported-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> > Tested-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> > --- > Rafael, I can take this through the CXL tree with some other pending > fixes. > > drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) Looks good, Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c > index 3b818ab186be..1f4fc5f8a819 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c > @@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_cfmws(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, > pr_warn("ACPI NUMA: Failed to add memblk for CFMWS node %d [mem %#llx-%#llx]\n", > node, start, end); > } > + node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed); > > /* Set the next available fake_pxm value */ > (*fake_pxm)++; >
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 1:55 AM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote: > > The ACPI CEDT.CFMWS indicates a range of possible address where new CXL > regions can appear. Each range is associated with a QTG id (QoS > Throttling Group id). For each range + QTG pair that is not covered by a proximity > domain in the SRAT, Linux creates a new NUMA node. However, the commit > that added the new ranges missed updating the node_possible mask which > causes memory_group_register() to fail. Add the new nodes to the > nodes_possible mask. > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> > Fixes: fd49f99c1809 ("ACPI: NUMA: Add a node and memblk for each CFMWS not in SRAT") > Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > Reported-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> > Tested-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> > --- > Rafael, I can take this through the CXL tree with some other pending > fixes. Sure. Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c > index 3b818ab186be..1f4fc5f8a819 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c > @@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_cfmws(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, > pr_warn("ACPI NUMA: Failed to add memblk for CFMWS node %d [mem %#llx-%#llx]\n", > node, start, end); > } > + node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed); > > /* Set the next available fake_pxm value */ > (*fake_pxm)++; >
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c index 3b818ab186be..1f4fc5f8a819 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c @@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_cfmws(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, pr_warn("ACPI NUMA: Failed to add memblk for CFMWS node %d [mem %#llx-%#llx]\n", node, start, end); } + node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed); /* Set the next available fake_pxm value */ (*fake_pxm)++;