Message ID | 6e7e4f3187e2fbbbb54bb1cf5793bf6e981a5a94.1666618868.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 545ddca0c32cb3ccdffed4aa9f063c84b432940c |
Headers | show |
Series | Trace2 timers and counters and some cleanup | expand |
As I do not see a cover letter for this series, here is the summary of the change since the previous round that has been in 'seen'. I didn't see anything questionable in these. Thanks, will queue. trace2/tr2_tgt.h | 2 +- trace2/tr2_tgt_event.c | 6 +++--- trace2/tr2_tgt_normal.c | 6 +++--- trace2/tr2_tgt_perf.c | 6 +++--- trace2/tr2_tls.h | 2 +- 5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git c/trace2/tr2_tgt.h w/trace2/tr2_tgt.h index 95f4c75472..bf8745c4f0 100644 --- c/trace2/tr2_tgt.h +++ w/trace2/tr2_tgt.h @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ struct tr2_timer; struct tr2_counter_metadata; struct tr2_counter; -#define NS_PER_SEC_D ((double)1000*1000*1000) +#define NS_TO_SEC(ns) ((double)(ns) / 1.0e9) /* * Function prototypes for a TRACE2 "target" vtable. diff --git c/trace2/tr2_tgt_event.c w/trace2/tr2_tgt_event.c index 981863a660..16f6332755 100644 --- c/trace2/tr2_tgt_event.c +++ w/trace2/tr2_tgt_event.c @@ -624,9 +624,9 @@ static void fn_timer(const struct tr2_timer_metadata *meta, { const char *event_name = is_final_data ? "timer" : "th_timer"; struct json_writer jw = JSON_WRITER_INIT; - double t_total = ((double)timer->total_ns) / NS_PER_SEC_D; - double t_min = ((double)timer->min_ns) / NS_PER_SEC_D; - double t_max = ((double)timer->max_ns) / NS_PER_SEC_D; + double t_total = NS_TO_SEC(timer->total_ns); + double t_min = NS_TO_SEC(timer->min_ns); + double t_max = NS_TO_SEC(timer->max_ns); jw_object_begin(&jw, 0); event_fmt_prepare(event_name, __FILE__, __LINE__, NULL, &jw); diff --git c/trace2/tr2_tgt_normal.c w/trace2/tr2_tgt_normal.c index def18674e8..fbbef68dfc 100644 --- c/trace2/tr2_tgt_normal.c +++ w/trace2/tr2_tgt_normal.c @@ -336,9 +336,9 @@ static void fn_timer(const struct tr2_timer_metadata *meta, { const char *event_name = is_final_data ? "timer" : "th_timer"; struct strbuf buf_payload = STRBUF_INIT; - double t_total = ((double)timer->total_ns) / NS_PER_SEC_D; - double t_min = ((double)timer->min_ns) / NS_PER_SEC_D; - double t_max = ((double)timer->max_ns) / NS_PER_SEC_D; + double t_total = NS_TO_SEC(timer->total_ns); + double t_min = NS_TO_SEC(timer->min_ns); + double t_max = NS_TO_SEC(timer->max_ns); strbuf_addf(&buf_payload, ("%s %s/%s" " intervals:%"PRIu64 diff --git c/trace2/tr2_tgt_perf.c w/trace2/tr2_tgt_perf.c index db94b2ef47..adae803263 100644 --- c/trace2/tr2_tgt_perf.c +++ w/trace2/tr2_tgt_perf.c @@ -562,9 +562,9 @@ static void fn_timer(const struct tr2_timer_metadata *meta, { const char *event_name = is_final_data ? "timer" : "th_timer"; struct strbuf buf_payload = STRBUF_INIT; - double t_total = ((double)timer->total_ns) / NS_PER_SEC_D; - double t_min = ((double)timer->min_ns) / NS_PER_SEC_D; - double t_max = ((double)timer->max_ns) / NS_PER_SEC_D; + double t_total = NS_TO_SEC(timer->total_ns); + double t_min = NS_TO_SEC(timer->min_ns); + double t_max = NS_TO_SEC(timer->max_ns); strbuf_addf(&buf_payload, ("name:%s" " intervals:%"PRIu64 diff --git c/trace2/tr2_tls.h w/trace2/tr2_tls.h index 289b62d072..f9049805d4 100644 --- c/trace2/tr2_tls.h +++ w/trace2/tr2_tls.h @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ struct tr2tls_thread_ctx { * Subsequent threads are given a non-zero thread_id and a thread_name * constructed from the id and a thread base name (which is usually just * the name of the thread-proc function). For example: - * { .thread_id=10, .thread_name="th10fsm-listen" } + * { .thread_id=10, .thread_name="th10:fsm-listen" } * This helps to identify and distinguish messages from concurrent threads. * The ctx.thread_name field is truncated if necessary to help with column * alignment in printf-style messages.
On 10/24/2022 4:31 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > As I do not see a cover letter for this series, here is the summary > of the change since the previous round that has been in 'seen'. > > I didn't see anything questionable in these. > > Thanks, will queue. The cover letter appears on my end, but I'm on the CC list. Jeff: be sure to CC Junio by adding him to the CC list on your PR description for anything you want to have considered for queuing. Thanks, -Stolee
Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com> writes: > On 10/24/2022 4:31 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> As I do not see a cover letter for this series, here is the summary >> of the change since the previous round that has been in 'seen'. >> >> I didn't see anything questionable in these. >> >> Thanks, will queue. > > The cover letter appears on my end, but I'm on the CC list. Yeah, it seems vger was a bit constipated yesterday. Everything came through at the end, and I am happy with the series. > Jeff: be sure to CC Junio by adding him to the CC list on your > PR description for anything you want to have considered for > queuing. Everybody wants their non RFC patches to have considered for queuing, but vger is not that lossy ;-)
diff --git a/trace2/tr2_tls.h b/trace2/tr2_tls.h index b1e327a928e..a90bd639d48 100644 --- a/trace2/tr2_tls.h +++ b/trace2/tr2_tls.h @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ struct tr2tls_thread_ctx { struct strbuf thread_name; uint64_t *array_us_start; - int alloc; - int nr_open_regions; /* plays role of "nr" in ALLOC_GROW */ + size_t alloc; + size_t nr_open_regions; /* plays role of "nr" in ALLOC_GROW */ int thread_id; };