Message ID | 20221104061659.4116508-1-usama.arif@bytedance.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | arm64: paravirt: remove conduit check in has_pv_steal_clock | expand |
On 04/11/2022 06:16, Usama Arif wrote: > arm_smccc_1_1_invoke() which is called later on in the function > will return failure if there's no conduit (or pre-SMCCC 1.1), > hence the check is unnecessary. > > Suggested-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c | 4 ---- > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c > index 57c7c211f8c7..aa718d6a9274 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c > @@ -141,10 +141,6 @@ static bool __init has_pv_steal_clock(void) > { > struct arm_smccc_res res; > > - /* To detect the presence of PV time support we require SMCCC 1.1+ */ > - if (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE) > - return false; > - > arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID, > ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_TIME_FEATURES, &res); >
On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 06:16:59 +0000, Usama Arif wrote: > arm_smccc_1_1_invoke() which is called later on in the function > will return failure if there's no conduit (or pre-SMCCC 1.1), > hence the check is unnecessary. > > Applied to arm64 (for-next/trivial), thanks! [1/1] arm64: paravirt: remove conduit check in has_pv_steal_clock https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/1e55b44d9ecd Cheers,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c index 57c7c211f8c7..aa718d6a9274 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c @@ -141,10 +141,6 @@ static bool __init has_pv_steal_clock(void) { struct arm_smccc_res res; - /* To detect the presence of PV time support we require SMCCC 1.1+ */ - if (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE) - return false; - arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID, ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_TIME_FEATURES, &res);
arm_smccc_1_1_invoke() which is called later on in the function will return failure if there's no conduit (or pre-SMCCC 1.1), hence the check is unnecessary. Suggested-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com> --- arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)