| Message ID | 20221101221110.17885-1-afd@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | AM57x EVM Device Tree Overlays | expand |
Hi Andrew & Rob, * Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> [221102 00:01]: > Hello all, > > These is an uncontroversial (hopefully) DT Overlay to support the > TI AM57x EVM. More complex cases are staged and ready to follow but > wanted to test the water with this one. > > For some reason dtbs_check does not get run on overlays, this > will need further investigation to fix in kbuild. For now I ran > it through manually but am not 100% sure it actually checked it, > so double checks here very welcome. > > Series depends on https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4548509.html Looks like we now have commit 26c9134a370a ("Merge branch 'dt/dtbo-rename' into dt/next") in Linux next. Can these two patches now be applied if I merge in the commit above? Regards, Tony
On 11/9/22 2:31 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Hi Andrew & Rob, > > * Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> [221102 00:01]: >> Hello all, >> >> These is an uncontroversial (hopefully) DT Overlay to support the >> TI AM57x EVM. More complex cases are staged and ready to follow but >> wanted to test the water with this one. >> >> For some reason dtbs_check does not get run on overlays, this >> will need further investigation to fix in kbuild. For now I ran >> it through manually but am not 100% sure it actually checked it, >> so double checks here very welcome. >> >> Series depends on https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4548509.html > > Looks like we now have commit 26c9134a370a ("Merge branch 'dt/dtbo-rename' > into dt/next") in Linux next. > > Can these two patches now be applied if I merge in the commit above? > 26c9134a370a is the same (v2) as the series (v1) I pointed to in the commit message. This series works on top of either. Thanks, Andrew > Regards, > > Tony
* Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> [221109 18:31]: > On 11/9/22 2:31 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi Andrew & Rob, > > > > * Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> [221102 00:01]: > > > Hello all, > > > > > > These is an uncontroversial (hopefully) DT Overlay to support the > > > TI AM57x EVM. More complex cases are staged and ready to follow but > > > wanted to test the water with this one. > > > > > > For some reason dtbs_check does not get run on overlays, this > > > will need further investigation to fix in kbuild. For now I ran > > > it through manually but am not 100% sure it actually checked it, > > > so double checks here very welcome. > > > > > > Series depends on https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4548509.html > > > > Looks like we now have commit 26c9134a370a ("Merge branch 'dt/dtbo-rename' > > into dt/next") in Linux next. > > > > Can these two patches now be applied if I merge in the commit above? > > > > 26c9134a370a is the same (v2) as the series (v1) I pointed to in the > commit message. This series works on top of either. Rob, are those commits immutable and OK to use as a base? Regards, Tony
* Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [221110 07:05]: > * Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> [221109 18:31]: > > On 11/9/22 2:31 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > Hi Andrew & Rob, > > > > > > * Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> [221102 00:01]: > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > These is an uncontroversial (hopefully) DT Overlay to support the > > > > TI AM57x EVM. More complex cases are staged and ready to follow but > > > > wanted to test the water with this one. > > > > > > > > For some reason dtbs_check does not get run on overlays, this > > > > will need further investigation to fix in kbuild. For now I ran > > > > it through manually but am not 100% sure it actually checked it, > > > > so double checks here very welcome. > > > > > > > > Series depends on https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4548509.html > > > > > > Looks like we now have commit 26c9134a370a ("Merge branch 'dt/dtbo-rename' > > > into dt/next") in Linux next. > > > > > > Can these two patches now be applied if I merge in the commit above? > > > > > > > 26c9134a370a is the same (v2) as the series (v1) I pointed to in the > > commit message. This series works on top of either. > > Rob, are those commits immutable and OK to use as a base? Andrew, I'm untagging these from my inbox, please resend when suitable. Regards, Tony