mbox series

[net-next,0/2] Handle alternate miss-completions

Message ID 20221110172800.1228118-1-jeroendb@google.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series Handle alternate miss-completions | expand

Message

Jeroen de Borst Nov. 10, 2022, 5:27 p.m. UTC 
Some versions of the virtual NIC present miss-completions in
an alternative way. This patch-set lets the diver handle these
alternate completions and announce this capability to the device.

Jeroen de Borst (2):
  Adding a new AdminQ command to verify driver
  Handle alternate miss completions

 drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve.h         |  1 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_adminq.c  | 19 +++++++
 drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_adminq.h  | 51 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_desc_dqo.h    |  5 ++
 drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_main.c    | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_tx_dqo.c  | 18 ++++---
 6 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Jeroen de Borst Nov. 10, 2022, 10:39 p.m. UTC | #1 
I should have prefixed these with 'gve:'. Let me know if I should resend them.

Apologies,
Jeroen


On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 9:28 AM Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@google.com> wrote:
>
> Some versions of the virtual NIC present miss-completions in
> an alternative way. This patch-set lets the diver handle these
> alternate completions and announce this capability to the device.
>
> Jeroen de Borst (2):
>   Adding a new AdminQ command to verify driver
>   Handle alternate miss completions
>
>  drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve.h         |  1 +
>  drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_adminq.c  | 19 +++++++
>  drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_adminq.h  | 51 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_desc_dqo.h    |  5 ++
>  drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_main.c    | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve_tx_dqo.c  | 18 ++++---
>  6 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.38.1.431.g37b22c650d-goog
>
Jakub Kicinski Nov. 11, 2022, 5:23 a.m. UTC | #2 
On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 14:39:39 -0800 Jeroen de Borst wrote:
> I should have prefixed these with 'gve:'. Let me know if I should resend them.

Yes, please.