diff mbox series

ARM: mvebu: switch to using gpiod API in pm-board code

Message ID Y3Qc6et/d+vhd71Q@google.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series ARM: mvebu: switch to using gpiod API in pm-board code | expand

Commit Message

Dmitry Torokhov Nov. 15, 2022, 11:12 p.m. UTC
This switches PM code to use the newer gpiod API instead of legacy
gpio API that we want to retire.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pm-board.c | 28 +++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Comments

Andrew Lunn Nov. 16, 2022, 1:10 a.m. UTC | #1
> -		ret = gpio_direction_output(pic_gpios[i], 0);
> -		if (ret < 0) {
> -			gpio_free(pic_gpios[i]);
> +		pic_gpios[i] = fwnode_gpiod_get_index(of_fwnode_handle(np),
> +						      "ctrl", i, GPIOD_OUT_HIGH,
> +						      name);

The old code passes value=0 to gpio_direction_output(). For
fwnode_gpiod_get_index() you pass GPIOD_OUT_HIGH. Is this correct?

	Andrew
Dmitry Torokhov Nov. 16, 2022, 1:40 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 02:10:29AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > -		ret = gpio_direction_output(pic_gpios[i], 0);
> > -		if (ret < 0) {
> > -			gpio_free(pic_gpios[i]);
> > +		pic_gpios[i] = fwnode_gpiod_get_index(of_fwnode_handle(np),
> > +						      "ctrl", i, GPIOD_OUT_HIGH,
> > +						      name);
> 
> The old code passes value=0 to gpio_direction_output(). For
> fwnode_gpiod_get_index() you pass GPIOD_OUT_HIGH. Is this correct?

Yes, gpiod API works on logical states, whereas old gpio API used signal
levels. In arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp-gp.dts ctrl-gpios are described
as "active low":

	cpus {
		pm_pic {
			ctrl-gpios = <&gpio0 16 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>,
				     <&gpio0 17 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>,
				     <&gpio0 18 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
		};
	};

so gpiolib will translate GPIOD_OUT_HIGH to 0 when setting final state
of the pin.

There are discussions to rename GPIOD_OUT_HIGH and friends to something
like active/inactive for better clarity, but that has not happened yet.

Thanks.
Andrew Lunn Nov. 16, 2022, 2:03 a.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 05:40:35PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 02:10:29AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > -		ret = gpio_direction_output(pic_gpios[i], 0);
> > > -		if (ret < 0) {
> > > -			gpio_free(pic_gpios[i]);
> > > +		pic_gpios[i] = fwnode_gpiod_get_index(of_fwnode_handle(np),
> > > +						      "ctrl", i, GPIOD_OUT_HIGH,
> > > +						      name);
> > 
> > The old code passes value=0 to gpio_direction_output(). For
> > fwnode_gpiod_get_index() you pass GPIOD_OUT_HIGH. Is this correct?
> 
> Yes, gpiod API works on logical states, whereas old gpio API used signal
> levels. In arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-xp-gp.dts ctrl-gpios are described
> as "active low":
> 
> 	cpus {
> 		pm_pic {
> 			ctrl-gpios = <&gpio0 16 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>,
> 				     <&gpio0 17 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>,
> 				     <&gpio0 18 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> 		};
> 	};
> 
> so gpiolib will translate GPIOD_OUT_HIGH to 0 when setting final state
> of the pin.

Ah, yes. I knew that once, but it has gotten forgotten.

Thanks for the explanation and reminder.

       Andrew
Andrew Lunn Nov. 16, 2022, 2:03 a.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 03:12:41PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> This switches PM code to use the newer gpiod API instead of legacy
> gpio API that we want to retire.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>

    Andrew
Gregory CLEMENT Nov. 28, 2022, 12:13 a.m. UTC | #5
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> writes:

> This switches PM code to use the newer gpiod API instead of legacy
> gpio API that we want to retire.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Applied on mvebu/dt

Thanks,

Gregory
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pm-board.c | 28 +++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pm-board.c b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pm-board.c
> index 7fa1806acd65..beec22e17e89 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pm-board.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pm-board.c
> @@ -8,19 +8,19 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
> -#include <linux/gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
> -#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include "common.h"
>  
>  #define ARMADA_PIC_NR_GPIOS 3
>  
>  static void __iomem *gpio_ctrl;
> -static int pic_gpios[ARMADA_PIC_NR_GPIOS];
> +static struct gpio_desc *pic_gpios[ARMADA_PIC_NR_GPIOS];
>  static int pic_raw_gpios[ARMADA_PIC_NR_GPIOS];
>  
>  static void mvebu_armada_pm_enter(void __iomem *sdram_reg, u32 srcmd)
> @@ -90,27 +90,17 @@ static int __init mvebu_armada_pm_init(void)
>  		char *name;
>  		struct of_phandle_args args;
>  
> -		pic_gpios[i] = of_get_named_gpio(np, "ctrl-gpios", i);
> -		if (pic_gpios[i] < 0) {
> -			ret = -ENODEV;
> -			goto out;
> -		}
> -
>  		name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "pic-pin%d", i);
>  		if (!name) {
>  			ret = -ENOMEM;
>  			goto out;
>  		}
>  
> -		ret = gpio_request(pic_gpios[i], name);
> -		if (ret < 0) {
> -			kfree(name);
> -			goto out;
> -		}
> -
> -		ret = gpio_direction_output(pic_gpios[i], 0);
> -		if (ret < 0) {
> -			gpio_free(pic_gpios[i]);
> +		pic_gpios[i] = fwnode_gpiod_get_index(of_fwnode_handle(np),
> +						      "ctrl", i, GPIOD_OUT_HIGH,
> +						      name);
> +		ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pic_gpios[i]);
> +		if (ret) {
>  			kfree(name);
>  			goto out;
>  		}
> @@ -118,7 +108,7 @@ static int __init mvebu_armada_pm_init(void)
>  		ret = of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(np, "ctrl-gpios", 2,
>  						       i, &args);
>  		if (ret < 0) {
> -			gpio_free(pic_gpios[i]);
> +			gpiod_put(pic_gpios[i]);
>  			kfree(name);
>  			goto out;
>  		}
> -- 
> 2.38.1.431.g37b22c650d-goog
>
>
> -- 
> Dmitry
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pm-board.c b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pm-board.c
index 7fa1806acd65..beec22e17e89 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pm-board.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/pm-board.c
@@ -8,19 +8,19 @@ 
  */
 
 #include <linux/delay.h>
-#include <linux/gpio.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
-#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include "common.h"
 
 #define ARMADA_PIC_NR_GPIOS 3
 
 static void __iomem *gpio_ctrl;
-static int pic_gpios[ARMADA_PIC_NR_GPIOS];
+static struct gpio_desc *pic_gpios[ARMADA_PIC_NR_GPIOS];
 static int pic_raw_gpios[ARMADA_PIC_NR_GPIOS];
 
 static void mvebu_armada_pm_enter(void __iomem *sdram_reg, u32 srcmd)
@@ -90,27 +90,17 @@  static int __init mvebu_armada_pm_init(void)
 		char *name;
 		struct of_phandle_args args;
 
-		pic_gpios[i] = of_get_named_gpio(np, "ctrl-gpios", i);
-		if (pic_gpios[i] < 0) {
-			ret = -ENODEV;
-			goto out;
-		}
-
 		name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "pic-pin%d", i);
 		if (!name) {
 			ret = -ENOMEM;
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		ret = gpio_request(pic_gpios[i], name);
-		if (ret < 0) {
-			kfree(name);
-			goto out;
-		}
-
-		ret = gpio_direction_output(pic_gpios[i], 0);
-		if (ret < 0) {
-			gpio_free(pic_gpios[i]);
+		pic_gpios[i] = fwnode_gpiod_get_index(of_fwnode_handle(np),
+						      "ctrl", i, GPIOD_OUT_HIGH,
+						      name);
+		ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pic_gpios[i]);
+		if (ret) {
 			kfree(name);
 			goto out;
 		}
@@ -118,7 +108,7 @@  static int __init mvebu_armada_pm_init(void)
 		ret = of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(np, "ctrl-gpios", 2,
 						       i, &args);
 		if (ret < 0) {
-			gpio_free(pic_gpios[i]);
+			gpiod_put(pic_gpios[i]);
 			kfree(name);
 			goto out;
 		}