Message ID | 20221026144208.373504-1-xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Support VMCOREINFO export for RISCV64 | expand |
On 10/26/22 at 10:42pm, Xianting Tian wrote: > As disscussed in below patch set, the patch of 'describe VMCOREINFO export in Documentation' > need to update according to Bagas's comments. > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/22AAF52E-8CC8-4D11-99CB-88DE4D113444@kernel.org/ > > As others patches in above patch set already applied, so this patch set only contains below two > patches. > > ------ > Changes: > Fix commit message in patch 2: use "Document these RISCV64 exports above" instead of > "This patch just add the description of VMCOREINFO export for RISCV64." > V1 -> V2: > Remove unnecessary overline above header text in patch 2. > V2 -> V3: > Fix commit message in patch 1,2; > Use 'space' instead of 'region' for vmemmap description in patch 2. > V3 -> V4: > Remove unnecessary kernel space export: > KASAN_SHADOW_START ~ KASAN_SHADOW_END, > ADDRESS_SPACE_END > V4 -> V5: > Remove IS_ENABLED() judgement for KERNEL_LINK_ADDR in patch 1. This series looks good to me, thanks. Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Hi risc-v maintainers, On 10/26/22 at 10:42pm, Xianting Tian wrote: > As disscussed in below patch set, the patch of 'describe VMCOREINFO export in Documentation' > need to update according to Bagas's comments. > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/22AAF52E-8CC8-4D11-99CB-88DE4D113444@kernel.org/ > > As others patches in above patch set already applied, so this patch set only contains below two > patches. Could you pick this patchset into risc-v tree since it has got acks and two Tested-by? Thanks Baoquan
On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 22:42:06 +0800, Xianting Tian wrote: > As disscussed in below patch set, the patch of 'describe VMCOREINFO export in Documentation' > need to update according to Bagas's comments. > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/22AAF52E-8CC8-4D11-99CB-88DE4D113444@kernel.org/ > > As others patches in above patch set already applied, so this patch set only contains below two > patches. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/2] RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support https://git.kernel.org/palmer/c/649d6b1019a2 [2/2] Documentation: kdump: describe VMCOREINFO export for RISCV64 https://git.kernel.org/palmer/c/c5b4216929eb Best regards,
Hello: This series was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next) by Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>: On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 22:42:06 +0800 you wrote: > As disscussed in below patch set, the patch of 'describe VMCOREINFO export in Documentation' > need to update according to Bagas's comments. > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/22AAF52E-8CC8-4D11-99CB-88DE4D113444@kernel.org/ > > As others patches in above patch set already applied, so this patch set only contains below two > patches. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [V5,1/2] RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/649d6b1019a2 - [V5,2/2] Documentation: kdump: describe VMCOREINFO export for RISCV64 https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/c5b4216929eb You are awesome, thank you!
Hi Palmer, Here are another two fix-up patches of kdump for the crash tool. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221020141603.2856206-3-guoren@kernel.org/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221020141603.2856206-2-guoren@kernel.org/ On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 8:56 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 22:42:06 +0800, Xianting Tian wrote: > > As disscussed in below patch set, the patch of 'describe VMCOREINFO export in Documentation' > > need to update according to Bagas's comments. > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/22AAF52E-8CC8-4D11-99CB-88DE4D113444@kernel.org/ > > > > As others patches in above patch set already applied, so this patch set only contains below two > > patches. > > > > [...] > > Applied, thanks! > > [1/2] RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support > https://git.kernel.org/palmer/c/649d6b1019a2 > [2/2] Documentation: kdump: describe VMCOREINFO export for RISCV64 > https://git.kernel.org/palmer/c/c5b4216929eb > > Best regards, > -- > Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Hey Palmer, Xianting, On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 04:49:39PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 22:42:06 +0800, Xianting Tian wrote: > > As disscussed in below patch set, the patch of 'describe VMCOREINFO export in Documentation' > > need to update according to Bagas's comments. > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/22AAF52E-8CC8-4D11-99CB-88DE4D113444@kernel.org/ > > > > As others patches in above patch set already applied, so this patch set only contains below two > > patches. > > > > [...] > > Applied, thanks! > > [1/2] RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support > https://git.kernel.org/palmer/c/649d6b1019a2 So this patch seems to be causing issues for the nommu build: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202212062250.tR0otHcz-lkp@intel.com/ I had a bit of a poke at trying to see if there were some headers we could pull in before actually checking the .config only to see: # CONFIG_MMU is not set Do we have to wrap the whole thing in a `#ifdef CONFIG_MMU` to fix compilation here? Thanks, Conor.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 7:05 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote: > > Hey Palmer, Xianting, > > On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 04:49:39PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 22:42:06 +0800, Xianting Tian wrote: > > > As disscussed in below patch set, the patch of 'describe VMCOREINFO export in Documentation' > > > need to update according to Bagas's comments. > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/22AAF52E-8CC8-4D11-99CB-88DE4D113444@kernel.org/ > > > > > > As others patches in above patch set already applied, so this patch set only contains below two > > > patches. > > > > > > [...] > > > > Applied, thanks! > > > > [1/2] RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support > > https://git.kernel.org/palmer/c/649d6b1019a2 > > So this patch seems to be causing issues for the nommu build: > https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202212062250.tR0otHcz-lkp@intel.com/ > > I had a bit of a poke at trying to see if there were some headers we > could pull in before actually checking the .config only to see: > # CONFIG_MMU is not set > > Do we have to wrap the whole thing in a `#ifdef CONFIG_MMU` to fix > compilation here? The problem does not belong to the patch. Could I send a fixup patch? like this? diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig index ef8d66de5f38..d8c07999426c 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig @@ -512,6 +512,7 @@ config ARCH_HAS_KEXEC_PURGATORY config CRASH_DUMP bool "Build kdump crash kernel" + depends on KEXEC help Generate crash dump after being started by kexec. This should be normally only set in special crash dump kernels which are > > Thanks, > Conor. >
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 11:34:57AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 7:05 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > Hey Palmer, Xianting, > > > > On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 04:49:39PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 22:42:06 +0800, Xianting Tian wrote: > > > > As disscussed in below patch set, the patch of 'describe VMCOREINFO export in Documentation' > > > > need to update according to Bagas's comments. > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/22AAF52E-8CC8-4D11-99CB-88DE4D113444@kernel.org/ > > > > > > > > As others patches in above patch set already applied, so this patch set only contains below two > > > > patches. > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > Applied, thanks! > > > > > > [1/2] RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support > > > https://git.kernel.org/palmer/c/649d6b1019a2 > > > > So this patch seems to be causing issues for the nommu build: > > https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202212062250.tR0otHcz-lkp@intel.com/ > > > > I had a bit of a poke at trying to see if there were some headers we > > could pull in before actually checking the .config only to see: > > # CONFIG_MMU is not set > > > > Do we have to wrap the whole thing in a `#ifdef CONFIG_MMU` to fix > > compilation here? > The problem does not belong to the patch. > > Could I send a fixup patch? like this? That seems like a sane dependancy, but did you build that config? This doesn't fix the problem for me :/ > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > index ef8d66de5f38..d8c07999426c 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > @@ -512,6 +512,7 @@ config ARCH_HAS_KEXEC_PURGATORY > > config CRASH_DUMP > bool "Build kdump crash kernel" > + depends on KEXEC > help > Generate crash dump after being started by kexec. This should > be normally only set in special crash dump kernels which are > > > > > Thanks, > > Conor. > > > > > -- > Best Regards > Guo Ren
On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 4:08 PM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 11:34:57AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 7:05 AM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hey Palmer, Xianting, > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 04:49:39PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 22:42:06 +0800, Xianting Tian wrote: > > > > > As disscussed in below patch set, the patch of 'describe VMCOREINFO export in Documentation' > > > > > need to update according to Bagas's comments. > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/22AAF52E-8CC8-4D11-99CB-88DE4D113444@kernel.org/ > > > > > > > > > > As others patches in above patch set already applied, so this patch set only contains below two > > > > > patches. > > > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > Applied, thanks! > > > > > > > > [1/2] RISC-V: Add arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo support > > > > https://git.kernel.org/palmer/c/649d6b1019a2 > > > > > > So this patch seems to be causing issues for the nommu build: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202212062250.tR0otHcz-lkp@intel.com/ > > > > > > I had a bit of a poke at trying to see if there were some headers we > > > could pull in before actually checking the .config only to see: > > > # CONFIG_MMU is not set > > > > > > Do we have to wrap the whole thing in a `#ifdef CONFIG_MMU` to fix > > > compilation here? > > The problem does not belong to the patch. > > > > Could I send a fixup patch? like this? > > That seems like a sane dependancy, but did you build that config? > This doesn't fix the problem for me :/ Sorry, It's the wrong fixup. Here is the new version, and tested. Thx for the report. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221207091112.2258674-1-guoren@kernel.org/ > > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > > index ef8d66de5f38..d8c07999426c 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > > @@ -512,6 +512,7 @@ config ARCH_HAS_KEXEC_PURGATORY > > > > config CRASH_DUMP > > bool "Build kdump crash kernel" > > + depends on KEXEC > > help > > Generate crash dump after being started by kexec. This should > > be normally only set in special crash dump kernels which are > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Conor. > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards > > Guo Ren