diff mbox series

[v1,3/4] software node: Switch property entry test to new API

Message ID 20221118185617.33908-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v1,1/4] media: ipu3-cio2: Don't dereference fwnode handle | expand

Commit Message

Andy Shevchenko Nov. 18, 2022, 6:56 p.m. UTC 
Switch property entry test to use software_node_register_node_group() API.
The current one is going to be removed soon.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c | 30 ++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

Comments

Greg KH Nov. 23, 2022, 7:01 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 08:56:16PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Switch property entry test to use software_node_register_node_group() API.
> The current one is going to be removed soon.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c | 30 ++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Andy Shevchenko Nov. 23, 2022, 7:07 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 08:01:56PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 08:56:16PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Switch property entry test to use software_node_register_node_group() API.
> > The current one is going to be removed soon.

> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Thank you! I hope this stays for v2 (which had been on mailing lists for
a few days).
Greg KH Nov. 23, 2022, 7:25 p.m. UTC | #3 
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 09:07:05PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 08:01:56PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 08:56:16PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > Switch property entry test to use software_node_register_node_group() API.
> > > The current one is going to be removed soon.
> 
> > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> 
> Thank you! I hope this stays for v2 (which had been on mailing lists for
> a few days).

Yes, sorry, that's the same there, so it holds for there too.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c b/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c
index 6071d5bc128c..dd2b606d76a3 100644
--- a/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c
+++ b/drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c
@@ -405,20 +405,18 @@  static void pe_test_move_inline_str(struct kunit *test)
 /* Handling of reference properties */
 static void pe_test_reference(struct kunit *test)
 {
-	static const struct software_node nodes[] = {
-		{ .name = "1", },
-		{ .name = "2", },
-		{ }
-	};
+	static const struct software_node node1 = { .name = "1" };
+	static const struct software_node node2 = { .name = "2" };
+	static const struct software_node *group[] = { &node1, &node2, NULL };
 
 	static const struct software_node_ref_args refs[] = {
-		SOFTWARE_NODE_REFERENCE(&nodes[0]),
-		SOFTWARE_NODE_REFERENCE(&nodes[1], 3, 4),
+		SOFTWARE_NODE_REFERENCE(&node1),
+		SOFTWARE_NODE_REFERENCE(&node2, 3, 4),
 	};
 
 	const struct property_entry entries[] = {
-		PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF("ref-1", &nodes[0]),
-		PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF("ref-2", &nodes[1], 1, 2),
+		PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF("ref-1", &node1),
+		PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF("ref-2", &node2, 1, 2),
 		PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF_ARRAY("ref-3", refs),
 		{ }
 	};
@@ -427,7 +425,7 @@  static void pe_test_reference(struct kunit *test)
 	struct fwnode_reference_args ref;
 	int error;
 
-	error = software_node_register_nodes(nodes);
+	error = software_node_register_node_group(group);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, error, 0);
 
 	node = fwnode_create_software_node(entries, NULL);
@@ -436,7 +434,7 @@  static void pe_test_reference(struct kunit *test)
 	error = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(node, "ref-1", NULL,
 						   0, 0, &ref);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &nodes[0]);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &node1);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.nargs, 0U);
 
 	/* wrong index */
@@ -447,7 +445,7 @@  static void pe_test_reference(struct kunit *test)
 	error = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(node, "ref-2", NULL,
 						   1, 0, &ref);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &nodes[1]);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &node2);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.nargs, 1U);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.args[0], 1LLU);
 
@@ -455,7 +453,7 @@  static void pe_test_reference(struct kunit *test)
 	error = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(node, "ref-2", NULL,
 						   3, 0, &ref);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &nodes[1]);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &node2);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.nargs, 3U);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.args[0], 1LLU);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.args[1], 2LLU);
@@ -470,14 +468,14 @@  static void pe_test_reference(struct kunit *test)
 	error = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(node, "ref-3", NULL,
 						   0, 0, &ref);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &nodes[0]);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &node1);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.nargs, 0U);
 
 	/* second reference in the array */
 	error = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(node, "ref-3", NULL,
 						   2, 1, &ref);
 	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, error, 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &nodes[1]);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, to_software_node(ref.fwnode), &node2);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.nargs, 2U);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.args[0], 3LLU);
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ref.args[1], 4LLU);
@@ -488,7 +486,7 @@  static void pe_test_reference(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_NE(test, error, 0);
 
 	fwnode_remove_software_node(node);
-	software_node_unregister_nodes(nodes);
+	software_node_unregister_node_group(group);
 }
 
 static struct kunit_case property_entry_test_cases[] = {