Message ID | 20221109064937.3643993-3-guoren@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 7ecdadf7f8c659524f6b2aebf6be7bf619764d90 |
Headers | show |
Series | riscv: stacktrace: A fixup and an optimization | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
conchuod/patch_count | success | Link |
conchuod/cover_letter | success | Series has a cover letter |
conchuod/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be fixes |
conchuod/fixes_present | success | Fixes tag present in non-next series |
conchuod/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
conchuod/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
conchuod/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
conchuod/build_rv32_defconfig | success | Build OK |
conchuod/build_warn_rv64 | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
conchuod/dtb_warn_rv64 | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
conchuod/header_inline | success | No static functions without inline keyword in header files |
conchuod/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 29 lines checked |
conchuod/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig | success | Build OK |
conchuod/verify_fixes | success | No Fixes tag |
conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig | success | Build OK |
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 2:50 PM <guoren@kernel.org> wrote: > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > The current walk_stackframe with FRAME_POINTER would stop unwinding at > ret_from_exception: > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1518 > in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: init > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 5.10.113-00021-g15c15974895c-dirty #192 > Call Trace: > [<ffffffe0002038c8>] walk_stackframe+0x0/0xee > [<ffffffe000aecf48>] show_stack+0x32/0x4a > [<ffffffe000af1618>] dump_stack_lvl+0x72/0x8e > [<ffffffe000af1648>] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c > [<ffffffe000239ad2>] ___might_sleep+0x12e/0x138 > [<ffffffe000239aec>] __might_sleep+0x10/0x18 > [<ffffffe000afe3fe>] down_read+0x22/0xa4 > [<ffffffe000207588>] do_page_fault+0xb0/0x2fe > [<ffffffe000201b80>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc > > The optimization would help walk_stackframe cross the pt_regs frame and > get more backtrace of debug info: > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1518 > in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: init > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 5.10.113-00021-g15c15974895c-dirty #192 > Call Trace: > [<ffffffe0002038c8>] walk_stackframe+0x0/0xee > [<ffffffe000aecf48>] show_stack+0x32/0x4a > [<ffffffe000af1618>] dump_stack_lvl+0x72/0x8e > [<ffffffe000af1648>] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c > [<ffffffe000239ad2>] ___might_sleep+0x12e/0x138 > [<ffffffe000239aec>] __might_sleep+0x10/0x18 > [<ffffffe000afe3fe>] down_read+0x22/0xa4 > [<ffffffe000207588>] do_page_fault+0xb0/0x2fe > [<ffffffe000201b80>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc > [<ffffffe000613c06>] riscv_intc_irq+0x1a/0x72 > [<ffffffe000201b80>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc > [<ffffffe00033f44a>] vma_link+0x54/0x160 > [<ffffffe000341d7a>] mmap_region+0x2cc/0x4d0 > [<ffffffe000342256>] do_mmap+0x2d8/0x3ac > [<ffffffe000326318>] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x70/0xb8 > [<ffffffe00032638a>] vm_mmap+0x2a/0x36 > [<ffffffe0003cfdde>] elf_map+0x72/0x84 > [<ffffffe0003d05f8>] load_elf_binary+0x69a/0xec8 > [<ffffffe000376240>] bprm_execve+0x246/0x53a > [<ffffffe00037786c>] kernel_execve+0xe8/0x124 > [<ffffffe000aecdf2>] run_init_process+0xfa/0x10c > [<ffffffe000aece16>] try_to_run_init_process+0x12/0x3c > [<ffffffe000afa920>] kernel_init+0xb4/0xf8 > [<ffffffe000201b80>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc > > Here is the error injection test code for the above output: > drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c: > static asmlinkage void riscv_intc_irq(struct pt_regs *regs) > { > unsigned long cause = regs->cause & ~CAUSE_IRQ_FLAG; > + u32 tmp; __get_user(tmp, (u32 *)0); > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> > Cc: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com> > --- > arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 2 +- > arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c | 9 +++++++++ > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > index b9eda3fcbd6d..329cf51fcd4d 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ ret_from_syscall_rejected: > andi t0, t0, _TIF_SYSCALL_WORK > bnez t0, handle_syscall_trace_exit > > -ret_from_exception: > +ENTRY(ret_from_exception) > REG_L s0, PT_STATUS(sp) > csrc CSR_STATUS, SR_IE > #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c > index bcfe9eb55f80..75c8dd64fc48 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c > @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ > > #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER > > +extern asmlinkage void ret_from_exception(void); > + > void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, > bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *arg) > { > @@ -59,6 +61,13 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, > fp = frame->fp; > pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(current, NULL, frame->ra, > &frame->ra); > + if (pc == (unsigned long) ret_from_exception) { I forgot ret_from_syscall because I tested it on the generic_entry series base. I would merge this patch into the generic_entry series as an optimization. > + if (unlikely(!__kernel_text_address(pc) || !fn(arg, pc))) > + break; > + > + pc = ((struct pt_regs *)sp)->epc; > + fp = ((struct pt_regs *)sp)->s0; > + } > } > > } > -- > 2.36.1 >
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 5:53 PM Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 2:50 PM <guoren@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > The current walk_stackframe with FRAME_POINTER would stop unwinding at > > ret_from_exception: > > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1518 > > in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: init > > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 5.10.113-00021-g15c15974895c-dirty #192 > > Call Trace: > > [<ffffffe0002038c8>] walk_stackframe+0x0/0xee > > [<ffffffe000aecf48>] show_stack+0x32/0x4a > > [<ffffffe000af1618>] dump_stack_lvl+0x72/0x8e > > [<ffffffe000af1648>] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c > > [<ffffffe000239ad2>] ___might_sleep+0x12e/0x138 > > [<ffffffe000239aec>] __might_sleep+0x10/0x18 > > [<ffffffe000afe3fe>] down_read+0x22/0xa4 > > [<ffffffe000207588>] do_page_fault+0xb0/0x2fe > > [<ffffffe000201b80>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc > > > > The optimization would help walk_stackframe cross the pt_regs frame and > > get more backtrace of debug info: > > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1518 > > in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: init > > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 5.10.113-00021-g15c15974895c-dirty #192 > > Call Trace: > > [<ffffffe0002038c8>] walk_stackframe+0x0/0xee > > [<ffffffe000aecf48>] show_stack+0x32/0x4a > > [<ffffffe000af1618>] dump_stack_lvl+0x72/0x8e > > [<ffffffe000af1648>] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c > > [<ffffffe000239ad2>] ___might_sleep+0x12e/0x138 > > [<ffffffe000239aec>] __might_sleep+0x10/0x18 > > [<ffffffe000afe3fe>] down_read+0x22/0xa4 > > [<ffffffe000207588>] do_page_fault+0xb0/0x2fe > > [<ffffffe000201b80>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc > > [<ffffffe000613c06>] riscv_intc_irq+0x1a/0x72 > > [<ffffffe000201b80>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc > > [<ffffffe00033f44a>] vma_link+0x54/0x160 > > [<ffffffe000341d7a>] mmap_region+0x2cc/0x4d0 > > [<ffffffe000342256>] do_mmap+0x2d8/0x3ac > > [<ffffffe000326318>] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x70/0xb8 > > [<ffffffe00032638a>] vm_mmap+0x2a/0x36 > > [<ffffffe0003cfdde>] elf_map+0x72/0x84 > > [<ffffffe0003d05f8>] load_elf_binary+0x69a/0xec8 > > [<ffffffe000376240>] bprm_execve+0x246/0x53a > > [<ffffffe00037786c>] kernel_execve+0xe8/0x124 > > [<ffffffe000aecdf2>] run_init_process+0xfa/0x10c > > [<ffffffe000aece16>] try_to_run_init_process+0x12/0x3c > > [<ffffffe000afa920>] kernel_init+0xb4/0xf8 > > [<ffffffe000201b80>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc > > > > Here is the error injection test code for the above output: > > drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c: > > static asmlinkage void riscv_intc_irq(struct pt_regs *regs) > > { > > unsigned long cause = regs->cause & ~CAUSE_IRQ_FLAG; > > + u32 tmp; __get_user(tmp, (u32 *)0); > > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> > > Cc: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com> > > --- > > arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 2 +- > > arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c | 9 +++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > > index b9eda3fcbd6d..329cf51fcd4d 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > > @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ ret_from_syscall_rejected: > > andi t0, t0, _TIF_SYSCALL_WORK > > bnez t0, handle_syscall_trace_exit > > > > -ret_from_exception: > > +ENTRY(ret_from_exception) > > REG_L s0, PT_STATUS(sp) > > csrc CSR_STATUS, SR_IE > > #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c > > index bcfe9eb55f80..75c8dd64fc48 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c > > @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER > > > > +extern asmlinkage void ret_from_exception(void); > > + > > void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, > > bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *arg) > > { > > @@ -59,6 +61,13 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, > > fp = frame->fp; > > pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(current, NULL, frame->ra, > > &frame->ra); > > + if (pc == (unsigned long) ret_from_exception) { > I forgot ret_from_syscall because I tested it on the generic_entry > series base. I would merge this patch into the generic_entry series as > an optimization. No, the patch is correct. The ret_from_syscall is unnecessary because it's from user space. > > > + if (unlikely(!__kernel_text_address(pc) || !fn(arg, pc))) > > + break; > > + > > + pc = ((struct pt_regs *)sp)->epc; > > + fp = ((struct pt_regs *)sp)->s0; > > + } > > } > > > > } > > -- > > 2.36.1 > > > > > -- > Best Regards > Guo Ren
On Tue, 08 Nov 2022 22:49:37 PST (-0800), guoren@kernel.org wrote: > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > The current walk_stackframe with FRAME_POINTER would stop unwinding at > ret_from_exception: > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1518 > in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: init > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 5.10.113-00021-g15c15974895c-dirty #192 > Call Trace: > [<ffffffe0002038c8>] walk_stackframe+0x0/0xee > [<ffffffe000aecf48>] show_stack+0x32/0x4a > [<ffffffe000af1618>] dump_stack_lvl+0x72/0x8e > [<ffffffe000af1648>] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c > [<ffffffe000239ad2>] ___might_sleep+0x12e/0x138 > [<ffffffe000239aec>] __might_sleep+0x10/0x18 > [<ffffffe000afe3fe>] down_read+0x22/0xa4 > [<ffffffe000207588>] do_page_fault+0xb0/0x2fe > [<ffffffe000201b80>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc > > The optimization would help walk_stackframe cross the pt_regs frame and > get more backtrace of debug info: > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1518 > in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: init > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 5.10.113-00021-g15c15974895c-dirty #192 > Call Trace: > [<ffffffe0002038c8>] walk_stackframe+0x0/0xee > [<ffffffe000aecf48>] show_stack+0x32/0x4a > [<ffffffe000af1618>] dump_stack_lvl+0x72/0x8e > [<ffffffe000af1648>] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c > [<ffffffe000239ad2>] ___might_sleep+0x12e/0x138 > [<ffffffe000239aec>] __might_sleep+0x10/0x18 > [<ffffffe000afe3fe>] down_read+0x22/0xa4 > [<ffffffe000207588>] do_page_fault+0xb0/0x2fe > [<ffffffe000201b80>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc > [<ffffffe000613c06>] riscv_intc_irq+0x1a/0x72 > [<ffffffe000201b80>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc > [<ffffffe00033f44a>] vma_link+0x54/0x160 > [<ffffffe000341d7a>] mmap_region+0x2cc/0x4d0 > [<ffffffe000342256>] do_mmap+0x2d8/0x3ac > [<ffffffe000326318>] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x70/0xb8 > [<ffffffe00032638a>] vm_mmap+0x2a/0x36 > [<ffffffe0003cfdde>] elf_map+0x72/0x84 > [<ffffffe0003d05f8>] load_elf_binary+0x69a/0xec8 > [<ffffffe000376240>] bprm_execve+0x246/0x53a > [<ffffffe00037786c>] kernel_execve+0xe8/0x124 > [<ffffffe000aecdf2>] run_init_process+0xfa/0x10c > [<ffffffe000aece16>] try_to_run_init_process+0x12/0x3c > [<ffffffe000afa920>] kernel_init+0xb4/0xf8 > [<ffffffe000201b80>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc > > Here is the error injection test code for the above output: > drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c: > static asmlinkage void riscv_intc_irq(struct pt_regs *regs) > { > unsigned long cause = regs->cause & ~CAUSE_IRQ_FLAG; > + u32 tmp; __get_user(tmp, (u32 *)0); > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> > Cc: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com> > --- > arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 2 +- > arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c | 9 +++++++++ > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > index b9eda3fcbd6d..329cf51fcd4d 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ ret_from_syscall_rejected: > andi t0, t0, _TIF_SYSCALL_WORK > bnez t0, handle_syscall_trace_exit > > -ret_from_exception: > +ENTRY(ret_from_exception) This at least needs an END(), but it should also be converted over to some non-function entry flavor. I converted it over to SYM_CODE_START_NOALIGN(), with the cooresponding SYM_CODE_END(), and put it on for-next. > REG_L s0, PT_STATUS(sp) > csrc CSR_STATUS, SR_IE > #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c > index bcfe9eb55f80..75c8dd64fc48 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c > @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ > > #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER > > +extern asmlinkage void ret_from_exception(void); > + > void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, > bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *arg) > { > @@ -59,6 +61,13 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, > fp = frame->fp; > pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(current, NULL, frame->ra, > &frame->ra); > + if (pc == (unsigned long)ret_from_exception) { > + if (unlikely(!__kernel_text_address(pc) || !fn(arg, pc))) > + break; > + > + pc = ((struct pt_regs *)sp)->epc; > + fp = ((struct pt_regs *)sp)->s0; > + } > } > > }
On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 10:59 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 08 Nov 2022 22:49:37 PST (-0800), guoren@kernel.org wrote: > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > The current walk_stackframe with FRAME_POINTER would stop unwinding at > > ret_from_exception: > > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1518 > > in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: init > > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 5.10.113-00021-g15c15974895c-dirty #192 > > Call Trace: > > [<ffffffe0002038c8>] walk_stackframe+0x0/0xee > > [<ffffffe000aecf48>] show_stack+0x32/0x4a > > [<ffffffe000af1618>] dump_stack_lvl+0x72/0x8e > > [<ffffffe000af1648>] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c > > [<ffffffe000239ad2>] ___might_sleep+0x12e/0x138 > > [<ffffffe000239aec>] __might_sleep+0x10/0x18 > > [<ffffffe000afe3fe>] down_read+0x22/0xa4 > > [<ffffffe000207588>] do_page_fault+0xb0/0x2fe > > [<ffffffe000201b80>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc > > > > The optimization would help walk_stackframe cross the pt_regs frame and > > get more backtrace of debug info: > > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1518 > > in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: init > > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 5.10.113-00021-g15c15974895c-dirty #192 > > Call Trace: > > [<ffffffe0002038c8>] walk_stackframe+0x0/0xee > > [<ffffffe000aecf48>] show_stack+0x32/0x4a > > [<ffffffe000af1618>] dump_stack_lvl+0x72/0x8e > > [<ffffffe000af1648>] dump_stack+0x14/0x1c > > [<ffffffe000239ad2>] ___might_sleep+0x12e/0x138 > > [<ffffffe000239aec>] __might_sleep+0x10/0x18 > > [<ffffffe000afe3fe>] down_read+0x22/0xa4 > > [<ffffffe000207588>] do_page_fault+0xb0/0x2fe > > [<ffffffe000201b80>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc > > [<ffffffe000613c06>] riscv_intc_irq+0x1a/0x72 > > [<ffffffe000201b80>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc > > [<ffffffe00033f44a>] vma_link+0x54/0x160 > > [<ffffffe000341d7a>] mmap_region+0x2cc/0x4d0 > > [<ffffffe000342256>] do_mmap+0x2d8/0x3ac > > [<ffffffe000326318>] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x70/0xb8 > > [<ffffffe00032638a>] vm_mmap+0x2a/0x36 > > [<ffffffe0003cfdde>] elf_map+0x72/0x84 > > [<ffffffe0003d05f8>] load_elf_binary+0x69a/0xec8 > > [<ffffffe000376240>] bprm_execve+0x246/0x53a > > [<ffffffe00037786c>] kernel_execve+0xe8/0x124 > > [<ffffffe000aecdf2>] run_init_process+0xfa/0x10c > > [<ffffffe000aece16>] try_to_run_init_process+0x12/0x3c > > [<ffffffe000afa920>] kernel_init+0xb4/0xf8 > > [<ffffffe000201b80>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc > > > > Here is the error injection test code for the above output: > > drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c: > > static asmlinkage void riscv_intc_irq(struct pt_regs *regs) > > { > > unsigned long cause = regs->cause & ~CAUSE_IRQ_FLAG; > > + u32 tmp; __get_user(tmp, (u32 *)0); > > > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> > > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> > > Cc: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com> > > --- > > arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 2 +- > > arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c | 9 +++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > > index b9eda3fcbd6d..329cf51fcd4d 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > > @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ ret_from_syscall_rejected: > > andi t0, t0, _TIF_SYSCALL_WORK > > bnez t0, handle_syscall_trace_exit > > > > -ret_from_exception: > > +ENTRY(ret_from_exception) > > This at least needs an END(), but it should also be converted over to Yes, I missed END() here. > some non-function entry flavor. I converted it over to > SYM_CODE_START_NOALIGN(), with the cooresponding SYM_CODE_END(), and put > it on for-next. Is that also for ret_from_fork & __switch_to? > > > REG_L s0, PT_STATUS(sp) > > csrc CSR_STATUS, SR_IE > > #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c > > index bcfe9eb55f80..75c8dd64fc48 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c > > @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER > > > > +extern asmlinkage void ret_from_exception(void); > > + > > void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, > > bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *arg) > > { > > @@ -59,6 +61,13 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, > > fp = frame->fp; > > pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(current, NULL, frame->ra, > > &frame->ra); > > + if (pc == (unsigned long)ret_from_exception) { > > + if (unlikely(!__kernel_text_address(pc) || !fn(arg, pc))) > > + break; > > + > > + pc = ((struct pt_regs *)sp)->epc; > > + fp = ((struct pt_regs *)sp)->s0; > > + } > > } > > > > }
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S index b9eda3fcbd6d..329cf51fcd4d 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ ret_from_syscall_rejected: andi t0, t0, _TIF_SYSCALL_WORK bnez t0, handle_syscall_trace_exit -ret_from_exception: +ENTRY(ret_from_exception) REG_L s0, PT_STATUS(sp) csrc CSR_STATUS, SR_IE #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c index bcfe9eb55f80..75c8dd64fc48 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/stacktrace.c @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER +extern asmlinkage void ret_from_exception(void); + void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, bool (*fn)(void *, unsigned long), void *arg) { @@ -59,6 +61,13 @@ void notrace walk_stackframe(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, fp = frame->fp; pc = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(current, NULL, frame->ra, &frame->ra); + if (pc == (unsigned long)ret_from_exception) { + if (unlikely(!__kernel_text_address(pc) || !fn(arg, pc))) + break; + + pc = ((struct pt_regs *)sp)->epc; + fp = ((struct pt_regs *)sp)->s0; + } } }