diff mbox series

net: xsk: Don't include <linux/rculist.h>

Message ID 88d6a1d88764cca328610854f890a9ca1f4b029e.1670086246.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit e9b4aeed56699b469206d05e706ddf2db95700a9
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series net: xsk: Don't include <linux/rculist.h> | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix warning Target tree name not specified in the subject
netdev/cover_letter success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 4555 this patch: 4555
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 14 of 14 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1094 this patch: 1094
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 4737 this patch: 4737
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 9 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 fail Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for set-matrix

Commit Message

Christophe JAILLET Dec. 3, 2022, 4:51 p.m. UTC 
There is no need to include <linux/rculist.h> here.

Prefer the less invasive <linux/types.h> which is needed for 'hlist_head'.

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
---
Let see if build-bots agree with me!

Just declaring 'struct mutex' and 'struct hlist_head' would also be an
option.
It would remove the need of any include, but is more likely to break
something.
---
 include/net/netns/xdp.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

John Fastabend Dec. 6, 2022, 10:49 p.m. UTC | #1 
Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> There is no need to include <linux/rculist.h> here.
> 
> Prefer the less invasive <linux/types.h> which is needed for 'hlist_head'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> ---
> Let see if build-bots agree with me!
> 
> Just declaring 'struct mutex' and 'struct hlist_head' would also be an
> option.
> It would remove the need of any include, but is more likely to break
> something.
> ---
>  include/net/netns/xdp.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/netns/xdp.h b/include/net/netns/xdp.h
> index e5734261ba0a..21a4f25a187a 100644
> --- a/include/net/netns/xdp.h
> +++ b/include/net/netns/xdp.h
> @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
>  #ifndef __NETNS_XDP_H__
>  #define __NETNS_XDP_H__
>  
> -#include <linux/rculist.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
>  
>  struct netns_xdp {
>  	struct mutex		lock;
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Dec. 7, 2022, 4:10 a.m. UTC | #2 
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Sat,  3 Dec 2022 17:51:04 +0100 you wrote:
> There is no need to include <linux/rculist.h> here.
> 
> Prefer the less invasive <linux/types.h> which is needed for 'hlist_head'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
> ---
> Let see if build-bots agree with me!
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - net: xsk: Don't include <linux/rculist.h>
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e9b4aeed5669

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/net/netns/xdp.h b/include/net/netns/xdp.h
index e5734261ba0a..21a4f25a187a 100644
--- a/include/net/netns/xdp.h
+++ b/include/net/netns/xdp.h
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ 
 #ifndef __NETNS_XDP_H__
 #define __NETNS_XDP_H__
 
-#include <linux/rculist.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
 
 struct netns_xdp {
 	struct mutex		lock;