Message ID | 20221101132032.1542416-3-tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | i2c-atr and FPDLink | expand |
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 03:20:26PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > From: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net> > > An ATR is a device that looks similar to an i2c-mux: it has an I2C > slave "upstream" port and N master "downstream" ports, and forwards > transactions from upstream to the appropriate downstream port. But is > is different in that the forwarded transaction has a different slave > address. The address used on the upstream bus is called the "alias" > and is (potentially) different from the physical slave address of the > downstream chip. > > Add a helper file (just like i2c-mux.c for a mux or switch) to allow > implementing ATR features in a device driver. The helper takes care or > adapter creation/destruction and translates addresses at each transaction. ... > i2c-topology > muxes/i2c-mux-gpio > i2c-sysfs > + muxes/i2c-atr Doesn't make sense to group muxes/*, that they are following each other? ... > +I2C ADDRESS TRANSLATOR (ATR) > +M: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net> Hmm... Are you going to maintain this? Or Review? Why not? > +L: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org > +S: Maintained > +F: drivers/i2c/i2c-atr.c > +F: include/linux/i2c-atr.h ... > + void *new_buf = kmalloc_array(num, sizeof(chan->orig_addrs[0]), > + GFP_KERNEL); > + if (new_buf == NULL) > + return -ENOMEM; Isn't it better to write this as void *new_buf; new_buf = kmalloc_array(num, sizeof(chan->orig_addrs[0]), GFP_KERNEL); if (!new_buf) return -ENOMEM; Remarks: - note the style of the conditional - why is it void? Also, does it make sense to use krealloc_array() or is it complete replacement of the data? > + kfree(chan->orig_addrs); > + chan->orig_addrs = new_buf; > + chan->orig_addrs_size = num; ... > +static void i2c_atr_unmap_msgs(struct i2c_atr_chan *chan, struct i2c_msg msgs[], > + int num) [] in the function parameter is longer than * and actually doesn't make difference in C. Ditto for the rest of similar cases. ... > +static int i2c_atr_smbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, u16 addr, > + unsigned short flags, char read_write, u8 command, > + int size, union i2c_smbus_data *data) Can flags be fixed size (yes I understand that in our case short would probably never be different to u16, but for the sake of clearness)? ... > +static int i2c_atr_attach_client(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, > + const struct i2c_board_info *info, > + const struct i2c_client *client) > +{ > + struct i2c_atr_chan *chan = adapter->algo_data; > + struct i2c_atr *atr = chan->atr; > + struct i2c_atr_cli2alias_pair *c2a; > + u16 alias_id = 0; Can we split assignment from the definition and locate it closer to the first use? > + int ret = 0; Useless assignment. > + > + c2a = kzalloc(sizeof(*c2a), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!c2a) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + ret = atr->ops->attach_client(atr, chan->chan_id, info, client, > + &alias_id); On one line looks better. > + if (ret) > + goto err_free; > + if (alias_id == 0) { > + ret = -EINVAL; > + goto err_free; > + } > + > + c2a->client = client; > + c2a->alias = alias_id; > + list_add(&c2a->node, &chan->alias_list); > + > + return 0; > + > +err_free: > + kfree(c2a); > + return ret; > +} ... > +int i2c_atr_add_adapter(struct i2c_atr *atr, u32 chan_id, > + struct fwnode_handle *bus_handle) > +{ > + struct i2c_adapter *parent = atr->parent; > + struct device *dev = atr->dev; > + struct i2c_atr_chan *chan; > + char *symlink_name; > + int ret; > + > + if (chan_id >= atr->max_adapters) { > + dev_err(dev, "No room for more i2c-atr adapters\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + if (atr->adapter[chan_id]) { > + dev_err(dev, "Adapter %d already present\n", chan_id); > + return -EEXIST; > + } > + > + chan = kzalloc(sizeof(*chan), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!chan) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + chan->atr = atr; > + chan->chan_id = chan_id; > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&chan->alias_list); > + mutex_init(&chan->orig_addrs_lock); > + > + snprintf(chan->adap.name, sizeof(chan->adap.name), "i2c-%d-atr-%d", > + i2c_adapter_id(parent), chan_id); > + chan->adap.owner = THIS_MODULE; > + chan->adap.algo = &atr->algo; > + chan->adap.algo_data = chan; > + chan->adap.dev.parent = dev; > + chan->adap.retries = parent->retries; > + chan->adap.timeout = parent->timeout; > + chan->adap.quirks = parent->quirks; > + chan->adap.lock_ops = &i2c_atr_lock_ops; > + chan->adap.attach_ops = &i2c_atr_attach_ops; > + > + if (bus_handle) { > + device_set_node(&chan->adap.dev, fwnode_handle_get(bus_handle)); > + } else { > + struct fwnode_handle *atr_node; > + struct fwnode_handle *child; > + u32 reg; > + > + atr_node = device_get_named_child_node(dev, "i2c-atr"); > + > + fwnode_for_each_child_node(atr_node, child) { > + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reg", ®); > + if (ret) > + continue; > + if (chan_id == reg) > + break; > + } > + > + device_set_node(&chan->adap.dev, child); > + fwnode_handle_put(atr_node); > + } It seems you have OF independent code, but by some reason you included of.h instead of property.h. Am I right? > + ret = i2c_add_adapter(&chan->adap); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(dev, "failed to add atr-adapter %u (error=%d)\n", > + chan_id, ret); > + goto err_add_adapter; > + } > + > + symlink_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "channel-%u", chan_id); No NULL check? > + WARN(sysfs_create_link(&chan->adap.dev.kobj, &dev->kobj, "atr_device"), > + "can't create symlink to atr device\n"); > + WARN(sysfs_create_link(&dev->kobj, &chan->adap.dev.kobj, symlink_name), > + "can't create symlink for channel %u\n", chan_id); Why WARNs? sysfs has already some in their implementation. > + > + kfree(symlink_name); > + > + dev_dbg(dev, "Added ATR child bus %d\n", i2c_adapter_id(&chan->adap)); > + > + atr->adapter[chan_id] = &chan->adap; > + return 0; > + > +err_add_adapter: > + mutex_destroy(&chan->orig_addrs_lock); > + kfree(chan); > + return ret; > +} ... > + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = adap->dev.fwnode; Please don't dereference fwnode like this, we have dev_fwnode() for that. ... > + if (atr->adapter[chan_id] == NULL) { ! > + dev_err(dev, "Adapter %d does not exist\n", chan_id); > + return; > + } ... > + snprintf(symlink_name, sizeof(symlink_name), > + "channel-%u", chan->chan_id); Once line? ... > + atr_size = struct_size(atr, adapter, max_adapters); > + if (atr_size == SIZE_MAX) > + return ERR_PTR(-EOVERFLOW); Dunno if you really need this to be separated from devm_kzalloc(), either way you will get an error, but in embedded case it will be -ENOMEM. > + atr = devm_kzalloc(dev, atr_size, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!atr) > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); ... > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_atr_delete); I would put these to their own namespace from day 1. ... > +/** > + * Helper to add I2C ATR features to a device driver. > + */ ??? Copy'n'paste typo? > +struct i2c_atr { > + /* private: internal use only */ > + > + struct i2c_adapter *parent; > + struct device *dev; > + const struct i2c_atr_ops *ops; > + > + void *priv; > + > + struct i2c_algorithm algo; > + struct mutex lock; > + int max_adapters; > + > + struct i2c_adapter *adapter[0]; No VLAs. > +}; ... > +int i2c_atr_add_adapter(struct i2c_atr *atr, u32 chan_id, > + struct fwnode_handle *bus_np); Missing struct fwnode_handle; at the top of the file?
Hi Andy, On 01/11/2022 16:30, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 03:20:26PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> From: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net> >> >> An ATR is a device that looks similar to an i2c-mux: it has an I2C >> slave "upstream" port and N master "downstream" ports, and forwards >> transactions from upstream to the appropriate downstream port. But is >> is different in that the forwarded transaction has a different slave >> address. The address used on the upstream bus is called the "alias" >> and is (potentially) different from the physical slave address of the >> downstream chip. >> >> Add a helper file (just like i2c-mux.c for a mux or switch) to allow >> implementing ATR features in a device driver. The helper takes care or >> adapter creation/destruction and translates addresses at each transaction. > > ... > >> i2c-topology >> muxes/i2c-mux-gpio >> i2c-sysfs >> + muxes/i2c-atr > > Doesn't make sense to group muxes/*, that they are following each other? Ok. > ... > >> +I2C ADDRESS TRANSLATOR (ATR) >> +M: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net> > > Hmm... Are you going to maintain this? Or Review? Why not? We haven't discussed with Luca if he wants to maintain this (this is mostly his code). But, indeed, I should add my name there. >> +L: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org >> +S: Maintained >> +F: drivers/i2c/i2c-atr.c >> +F: include/linux/i2c-atr.h > > ... > >> + void *new_buf = kmalloc_array(num, sizeof(chan->orig_addrs[0]), >> + GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (new_buf == NULL) >> + return -ENOMEM; > > Isn't it better to write this as > > void *new_buf; > > new_buf = kmalloc_array(num, sizeof(chan->orig_addrs[0]), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!new_buf) > return -ENOMEM; Ok. > Remarks: > - note the style of the conditional > - why is it void? No idea. I'll change it. > > Also, does it make sense to use krealloc_array() or is it complete replacement > of the data? The whole array will be rewritten, so we don't need to preserve the current data. The buffer allocated here (i.e. orig_addrs) is only used for the duration of the i2c_atr_master_xfer(). So, we could allocate a new buffer for every xfer call, but to avoid that, we retain the old buffer. Any old data in the buffer can be discarded. >> + kfree(chan->orig_addrs); >> + chan->orig_addrs = new_buf; >> + chan->orig_addrs_size = num; > > ... > >> +static void i2c_atr_unmap_msgs(struct i2c_atr_chan *chan, struct i2c_msg msgs[], >> + int num) > > [] in the function parameter is longer than * and actually doesn't make > difference in C. Ditto for the rest of similar cases. Ok. I missed a few, it seems. > ... > >> +static int i2c_atr_smbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, u16 addr, >> + unsigned short flags, char read_write, u8 command, >> + int size, union i2c_smbus_data *data) > > Can flags be fixed size (yes I understand that in our case short would probably > never be different to u16, but for the sake of clearness)? The parameters and their types come from the ops in struct i2c_algorithm. > ... > >> +static int i2c_atr_attach_client(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, >> + const struct i2c_board_info *info, >> + const struct i2c_client *client) >> +{ >> + struct i2c_atr_chan *chan = adapter->algo_data; >> + struct i2c_atr *atr = chan->atr; >> + struct i2c_atr_cli2alias_pair *c2a; > >> + u16 alias_id = 0; > > Can we split assignment from the definition and locate it closer to the first > use? Actually, I don't think we need to initialize it at all. If attach_client() fails, we don't care about alias_id. If attach_client() succeeds, it _must_ return alias_id. >> + int ret = 0; > > Useless assignment. Yep. >> + >> + c2a = kzalloc(sizeof(*c2a), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!c2a) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + ret = atr->ops->attach_client(atr, chan->chan_id, info, client, >> + &alias_id); > > On one line looks better. I agree, but it doesn't fit into 80 characters. I personally think that's a too narrow a limit, but some maintainers absolutely require max 80 chars, so I try to limit the lines to 80 unless it looks really ugly. >> + if (ret) >> + goto err_free; >> + if (alias_id == 0) { >> + ret = -EINVAL; >> + goto err_free; >> + } >> + >> + c2a->client = client; >> + c2a->alias = alias_id; >> + list_add(&c2a->node, &chan->alias_list); >> + >> + return 0; >> + >> +err_free: >> + kfree(c2a); >> + return ret; >> +} > > ... > >> +int i2c_atr_add_adapter(struct i2c_atr *atr, u32 chan_id, >> + struct fwnode_handle *bus_handle) >> +{ >> + struct i2c_adapter *parent = atr->parent; >> + struct device *dev = atr->dev; >> + struct i2c_atr_chan *chan; >> + char *symlink_name; >> + int ret; >> + >> + if (chan_id >= atr->max_adapters) { >> + dev_err(dev, "No room for more i2c-atr adapters\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + if (atr->adapter[chan_id]) { >> + dev_err(dev, "Adapter %d already present\n", chan_id); >> + return -EEXIST; >> + } >> + >> + chan = kzalloc(sizeof(*chan), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!chan) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + chan->atr = atr; >> + chan->chan_id = chan_id; >> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&chan->alias_list); >> + mutex_init(&chan->orig_addrs_lock); >> + >> + snprintf(chan->adap.name, sizeof(chan->adap.name), "i2c-%d-atr-%d", >> + i2c_adapter_id(parent), chan_id); >> + chan->adap.owner = THIS_MODULE; >> + chan->adap.algo = &atr->algo; >> + chan->adap.algo_data = chan; >> + chan->adap.dev.parent = dev; >> + chan->adap.retries = parent->retries; >> + chan->adap.timeout = parent->timeout; >> + chan->adap.quirks = parent->quirks; >> + chan->adap.lock_ops = &i2c_atr_lock_ops; >> + chan->adap.attach_ops = &i2c_atr_attach_ops; >> + >> + if (bus_handle) { >> + device_set_node(&chan->adap.dev, fwnode_handle_get(bus_handle)); >> + } else { >> + struct fwnode_handle *atr_node; >> + struct fwnode_handle *child; >> + u32 reg; >> + >> + atr_node = device_get_named_child_node(dev, "i2c-atr"); >> + >> + fwnode_for_each_child_node(atr_node, child) { >> + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reg", ®); >> + if (ret) >> + continue; >> + if (chan_id == reg) >> + break; >> + } >> + >> + device_set_node(&chan->adap.dev, child); >> + fwnode_handle_put(atr_node); >> + } > > It seems you have OF independent code, but by some reason you included of.h > instead of property.h. Am I right? Just an leftover from the conversion from of to fwnode. >> + ret = i2c_add_adapter(&chan->adap); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to add atr-adapter %u (error=%d)\n", >> + chan_id, ret); >> + goto err_add_adapter; >> + } >> + >> + symlink_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "channel-%u", chan_id); > > No NULL check? Right, missed that. >> + WARN(sysfs_create_link(&chan->adap.dev.kobj, &dev->kobj, "atr_device"), >> + "can't create symlink to atr device\n"); >> + WARN(sysfs_create_link(&dev->kobj, &chan->adap.dev.kobj, symlink_name), >> + "can't create symlink for channel %u\n", chan_id); > > Why WARNs? sysfs has already some in their implementation. True, and I can drop these if required. But afaics, sysfs_create_link only warns if there's a duplicate entry, not for other errors. >> + >> + kfree(symlink_name); >> + >> + dev_dbg(dev, "Added ATR child bus %d\n", i2c_adapter_id(&chan->adap)); >> + >> + atr->adapter[chan_id] = &chan->adap; >> + return 0; >> + >> +err_add_adapter: >> + mutex_destroy(&chan->orig_addrs_lock); >> + kfree(chan); >> + return ret; >> +} > > ... > >> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = adap->dev.fwnode; > > Please don't dereference fwnode like this, we have dev_fwnode() for that. Ok. > ... > >> + if (atr->adapter[chan_id] == NULL) { > > ! Yep. >> + dev_err(dev, "Adapter %d does not exist\n", chan_id); >> + return; >> + } > > ... > >> + snprintf(symlink_name, sizeof(symlink_name), >> + "channel-%u", chan->chan_id); > > Once line? 80 char limit here too. But I see that this is (kind of) broken. In the i2c_atr_add_adapter() I used dynamic alloc for the symlink_name, but here we still have the fixed size buffer. > > ... > >> + atr_size = struct_size(atr, adapter, max_adapters); > >> + if (atr_size == SIZE_MAX) >> + return ERR_PTR(-EOVERFLOW); > > Dunno if you really need this to be separated from devm_kzalloc(), either way > you will get an error, but in embedded case it will be -ENOMEM. Yep. Well... I kind of like it to be explicit. Calling alloc(SIZE_MAX) doesn't feel nice. >> + atr = devm_kzalloc(dev, atr_size, GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!atr) >> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > > ... > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_atr_delete); > > I would put these to their own namespace from day 1. What would be the namespace? Isn't this something that should be subsystem-wide decision? I have to admit I have never used symbol namespaces, and don't know much about them. > > ... > >> +/** >> + * Helper to add I2C ATR features to a device driver. >> + */ > > ??? Copy'n'paste typo? No idea where that is from... I'll fix it. >> +struct i2c_atr { >> + /* private: internal use only */ >> + >> + struct i2c_adapter *parent; >> + struct device *dev; >> + const struct i2c_atr_ops *ops; >> + >> + void *priv; >> + >> + struct i2c_algorithm algo; >> + struct mutex lock; >> + int max_adapters; >> + >> + struct i2c_adapter *adapter[0]; > > No VLAs. Ok. I'm not arguing against any of the comments you've made, I think they are all valid, but I want to point out that many of them are in a code copied from i2c-mux. Whether there's any value in keeping i2c-mux and i2c-atr similar in design/style... Maybe not. >> +}; > > ... > >> +int i2c_atr_add_adapter(struct i2c_atr *atr, u32 chan_id, >> + struct fwnode_handle *bus_np); > > Missing > > struct fwnode_handle; > > at the top of the file? Ok. Tomi
On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 01:59:06PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 01/11/2022 16:30, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 03:20:26PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: ... > > > + ret = atr->ops->attach_client(atr, chan->chan_id, info, client, > > > + &alias_id); > > > > On one line looks better. > > I agree, but it doesn't fit into 80 characters. I personally think that's a > too narrow a limit, but some maintainers absolutely require max 80 chars, so > I try to limit the lines to 80 unless it looks really ugly. OK. ... > > > + WARN(sysfs_create_link(&chan->adap.dev.kobj, &dev->kobj, "atr_device"), > > > + "can't create symlink to atr device\n"); > > > + WARN(sysfs_create_link(&dev->kobj, &chan->adap.dev.kobj, symlink_name), > > > + "can't create symlink for channel %u\n", chan_id); > > > > Why WARNs? sysfs has already some in their implementation. > > True, and I can drop these if required. But afaics, sysfs_create_link only > warns if there's a duplicate entry, not for other errors. The problem with WARN that it can be easily converted to real Oops. Do you consider other errors are so fatal that machine would need a reboot? ... > > > + atr_size = struct_size(atr, adapter, max_adapters); > > > > > + if (atr_size == SIZE_MAX) > > > + return ERR_PTR(-EOVERFLOW); > > > > Dunno if you really need this to be separated from devm_kzalloc(), either way > > you will get an error, but in embedded case it will be -ENOMEM. > > Yep. Well... I kind of like it to be explicit. Calling alloc(SIZE_MAX) > doesn't feel nice. Yeah, but that is exactly the point of returning SIZE_MAX by the helpers from overflow.h. And many of them are called inside a few k*alloc*() APIs. So, I don't think it's ugly or not nice from that perspective. > > > + atr = devm_kzalloc(dev, atr_size, GFP_KERNEL); > > > + if (!atr) > > > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); ... > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_atr_delete); > > > > I would put these to their own namespace from day 1. > > What would be the namespace? Isn't this something that should be > subsystem-wide decision? I have to admit I have never used symbol > namespaces, and don't know much about them. Yes, subsystem is I2C, but you introducing a kinda subsubsystem. Wouldn't be better to provide all symbols in the I2C_ATR namespace from now on? It really helps not polluting global namespace and also helps to identify users in the source tree. ... > > > +struct i2c_atr { > > > + /* private: internal use only */ > > > + > > > + struct i2c_adapter *parent; > > > + struct device *dev; > > > + const struct i2c_atr_ops *ops; > > > + > > > + void *priv; > > > + > > > + struct i2c_algorithm algo; > > > + struct mutex lock; > > > + int max_adapters; > > > + > > > + struct i2c_adapter *adapter[0]; > > > > No VLAs. > > Ok. > > I'm not arguing against any of the comments you've made, I think they are > all valid, but I want to point out that many of them are in a code copied > from i2c-mux. > > Whether there's any value in keeping i2c-mux and i2c-atr similar in > design/style... Maybe not. You can address my comment by simply dropping 0 in the respective member. > > > +};
On 04/11/2022 14:38, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 01:59:06PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> On 01/11/2022 16:30, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 03:20:26PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > ... > >>>> + ret = atr->ops->attach_client(atr, chan->chan_id, info, client, >>>> + &alias_id); >>> >>> On one line looks better. >> >> I agree, but it doesn't fit into 80 characters. I personally think that's a >> too narrow a limit, but some maintainers absolutely require max 80 chars, so >> I try to limit the lines to 80 unless it looks really ugly. > > OK. > > ... > >>>> + WARN(sysfs_create_link(&chan->adap.dev.kobj, &dev->kobj, "atr_device"), >>>> + "can't create symlink to atr device\n"); >>>> + WARN(sysfs_create_link(&dev->kobj, &chan->adap.dev.kobj, symlink_name), >>>> + "can't create symlink for channel %u\n", chan_id); >>> >>> Why WARNs? sysfs has already some in their implementation. >> >> True, and I can drop these if required. But afaics, sysfs_create_link only >> warns if there's a duplicate entry, not for other errors. > > The problem with WARN that it can be easily converted to real Oops. Do you > consider other errors are so fatal that machine would need a reboot? Yes, WARNs are bad, especially as the error here is not critical. I'll change these to dev_warn(). (also, I didn't know WARN could be made to oops). > ... > >>>> + atr_size = struct_size(atr, adapter, max_adapters); >>> >>>> + if (atr_size == SIZE_MAX) >>>> + return ERR_PTR(-EOVERFLOW); >>> >>> Dunno if you really need this to be separated from devm_kzalloc(), either way >>> you will get an error, but in embedded case it will be -ENOMEM. >> >> Yep. Well... I kind of like it to be explicit. Calling alloc(SIZE_MAX) >> doesn't feel nice. > > Yeah, but that is exactly the point of returning SIZE_MAX by the helpers from > overflow.h. And many of them are called inside a few k*alloc*() APIs. > > So, I don't think it's ugly or not nice from that perspective. Ok, sounds fine to me. I'll drop the check. >>>> + atr = devm_kzalloc(dev, atr_size, GFP_KERNEL); >>>> + if (!atr) >>>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > > ... > >>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_atr_delete); >>> >>> I would put these to their own namespace from day 1. >> >> What would be the namespace? Isn't this something that should be >> subsystem-wide decision? I have to admit I have never used symbol >> namespaces, and don't know much about them. > > Yes, subsystem is I2C, but you introducing a kinda subsubsystem. Wouldn't be > better to provide all symbols in the I2C_ATR namespace from now on? > > It really helps not polluting global namespace and also helps to identify > users in the source tree. Alright, I'll look into this. > ... > >>>> +struct i2c_atr { >>>> + /* private: internal use only */ >>>> + >>>> + struct i2c_adapter *parent; >>>> + struct device *dev; >>>> + const struct i2c_atr_ops *ops; >>>> + >>>> + void *priv; >>>> + >>>> + struct i2c_algorithm algo; >>>> + struct mutex lock; >>>> + int max_adapters; >>>> + >>>> + struct i2c_adapter *adapter[0]; >>> >>> No VLAs. >> >> Ok. >> >> I'm not arguing against any of the comments you've made, I think they are >> all valid, but I want to point out that many of them are in a code copied >> from i2c-mux. >> >> Whether there's any value in keeping i2c-mux and i2c-atr similar in >> design/style... Maybe not. > > You can address my comment by simply dropping 0 in the respective member. Oh, I thought you meant no "extensible" structs. I'll drop the 0. Tomi
On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 05:26:24PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 04/11/2022 14:38, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 01:59:06PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > On 01/11/2022 16:30, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 03:20:26PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: ... > > > > > + WARN(sysfs_create_link(&chan->adap.dev.kobj, &dev->kobj, "atr_device"), > > > > > + "can't create symlink to atr device\n"); > > > > > + WARN(sysfs_create_link(&dev->kobj, &chan->adap.dev.kobj, symlink_name), > > > > > + "can't create symlink for channel %u\n", chan_id); > > > > > > > > Why WARNs? sysfs has already some in their implementation. > > > > > > True, and I can drop these if required. But afaics, sysfs_create_link only > > > warns if there's a duplicate entry, not for other errors. > > > > The problem with WARN that it can be easily converted to real Oops. Do you > > consider other errors are so fatal that machine would need a reboot? > > Yes, WARNs are bad, especially as the error here is not critical. I'll > change these to dev_warn(). (also, I didn't know WARN could be made to > oops). panic_on_warn
On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 13:59:06 +0200 Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > Hi Andy, > > On 01/11/2022 16:30, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 03:20:26PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > >> From: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net> > >> > >> An ATR is a device that looks similar to an i2c-mux: it has an I2C > >> slave "upstream" port and N master "downstream" ports, and forwards > >> transactions from upstream to the appropriate downstream port. But is > >> is different in that the forwarded transaction has a different slave > >> address. The address used on the upstream bus is called the "alias" > >> and is (potentially) different from the physical slave address of the > >> downstream chip. > >> > >> Add a helper file (just like i2c-mux.c for a mux or switch) to allow > >> implementing ATR features in a device driver. The helper takes care or > >> adapter creation/destruction and translates addresses at each transaction. First of all, thank you for bringing this work on! > > ... > > > >> +I2C ADDRESS TRANSLATOR (ATR) > >> +M: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net> > > > > Hmm... Are you going to maintain this? Or Review? Why not? > > We haven't discussed with Luca if he wants to maintain this (this is > mostly his code). But, indeed, I should add my name there. I think at this point you are probably in a better position to be the maintainer, but I'm OK with being listed here as reviewer (R:). Ah, would you please use my bootlin dot com address here? > I'm not arguing against any of the comments you've made, I think they > are all valid, but I want to point out that many of them are in a code > copied from i2c-mux. > > Whether there's any value in keeping i2c-mux and i2c-atr similar in > design/style... Maybe not. Tomi is right, when I wrote this initially I tried to keep it as similar as possible to i2c-mux.c. No problem in deviating from that wherever it makes sense.
On 07/11/2022 13:40, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 13:59:06 +0200 > Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> wrote: > >> Hi Andy, >> >> On 01/11/2022 16:30, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 03:20:26PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >>>> From: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net> >>>> >>>> An ATR is a device that looks similar to an i2c-mux: it has an I2C >>>> slave "upstream" port and N master "downstream" ports, and forwards >>>> transactions from upstream to the appropriate downstream port. But is >>>> is different in that the forwarded transaction has a different slave >>>> address. The address used on the upstream bus is called the "alias" >>>> and is (potentially) different from the physical slave address of the >>>> downstream chip. >>>> >>>> Add a helper file (just like i2c-mux.c for a mux or switch) to allow >>>> implementing ATR features in a device driver. The helper takes care or >>>> adapter creation/destruction and translates addresses at each transaction. > > First of all, thank you for bringing this work on! > >>> ... >>> >>>> +I2C ADDRESS TRANSLATOR (ATR) >>>> +M: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net> >>> >>> Hmm... Are you going to maintain this? Or Review? Why not? >> >> We haven't discussed with Luca if he wants to maintain this (this is >> mostly his code). But, indeed, I should add my name there. > > I think at this point you are probably in a better position to be the > maintainer, but I'm OK with being listed here as reviewer (R:). > > Ah, would you please use my bootlin dot com address here? Ok, I've added your bootlin address as R: Tomi
diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/index.rst b/Documentation/i2c/index.rst index 6270f1fd7d4e..3d177d4ec1d2 100644 --- a/Documentation/i2c/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/i2c/index.rst @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ Introduction i2c-topology muxes/i2c-mux-gpio i2c-sysfs + muxes/i2c-atr Writing device drivers ====================== diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/muxes/i2c-atr.rst b/Documentation/i2c/muxes/i2c-atr.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..14597c9ec19b --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/i2c/muxes/i2c-atr.rst @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +===================== +Kernel driver i2c-atr +===================== + +Author: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net> + +Description +----------- + +An I2C Address Translator (ATR) is a device with an I2C slave parent +("upstream") port and N I2C master child ("downstream") ports, and +forwards transactions from upstream to the appropriate downstream port +with a modified slave address. The address used on the parent bus is +called the "alias" and is (potentially) different from the physical +slave address of the child bus. Address translation is done by the +hardware. + +An ATR looks similar to an i2c-mux except: + - the address on the parent and child busses can be different + - there is normally no need to select the child port; the alias used on the + parent bus implies it + +The ATR functionality can be provided by a chip with many other +features. This file provides a helper to implement an ATR within your +driver. + +The ATR creates a new I2C "child" adapter on each child bus. Adding +devices on the child bus ends up in invoking the driver code to select +an available alias. Maintaining an appropriate pool of available aliases +and picking one for each new device is up to the driver implementer. The +ATR maintains an table of currently assigned alias and uses it to modify +all I2C transactions directed to devices on the child buses. + +A typical example follows. + +Topology:: + + Slave X @ 0x10 + .-----. | + .-----. | |---+---- B + | CPU |--A--| ATR | + `-----' | |---+---- C + `-----' | + Slave Y @ 0x10 + +Alias table: + +.. table:: + + ====== ===== + Client Alias + ====== ===== + X 0x20 + Y 0x30 + ====== ===== + +Transaction: + + - Slave X driver sends a transaction (on adapter B), slave address 0x10 + - ATR driver rewrites messages with address 0x20, forwards to adapter A + - Physical I2C transaction on bus A, slave address 0x20 + - ATR chip propagates transaction on bus B with address translated to 0x10 + - Slave X chip replies on bus B + - ATR chip forwards reply on bus A + - ATR driver rewrites messages with address 0x10 + - Slave X driver gets back the msgs[], with reply and address 0x10 + +Usage: + + 1. In your driver (typically in the probe function) add an ATR by + calling i2c_atr_new() passing your attach/detach callbacks + 2. When the attach callback is called pick an appropriate alias, + configure it in your chip and return the chosen alias in the + alias_id parameter + 3. When the detach callback is called, deconfigure the alias from + your chip and put it back in the pool for later usage diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 379945f82a64..357de12cbca6 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -9568,6 +9568,13 @@ L: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org S: Maintained F: drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c +I2C ADDRESS TRANSLATOR (ATR) +M: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net> +L: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org +S: Maintained +F: drivers/i2c/i2c-atr.c +F: include/linux/i2c-atr.h + I2C CONTROLLER DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GPU M: Ajay Gupta <ajayg@nvidia.com> L: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org diff --git a/drivers/i2c/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/Kconfig index 438905e2a1d0..c6d1a345ea6d 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/i2c/Kconfig @@ -71,6 +71,15 @@ config I2C_MUX source "drivers/i2c/muxes/Kconfig" +config I2C_ATR + tristate "I2C Address Translator (ATR) support" + help + Enable support for I2C Address Translator (ATR) chips. + + An ATR allows accessing multiple I2C busses from a single + physical bus via address translation instead of bus selection as + i2c-muxes do. + config I2C_HELPER_AUTO bool "Autoselect pertinent helper modules" default y diff --git a/drivers/i2c/Makefile b/drivers/i2c/Makefile index c1d493dc9bac..3f71ce4711e3 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/Makefile +++ b/drivers/i2c/Makefile @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ i2c-core-$(CONFIG_OF) += i2c-core-of.o obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_SMBUS) += i2c-smbus.o obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_CHARDEV) += i2c-dev.o obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_MUX) += i2c-mux.o +obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_ATR) += i2c-atr.o obj-y += algos/ busses/ muxes/ obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_STUB) += i2c-stub.o obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE_EEPROM) += i2c-slave-eeprom.o diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-atr.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-atr.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..5636bbd03b09 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-atr.c @@ -0,0 +1,497 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * I2C Address Translator + * + * Copyright (c) 2019,2022 Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net> + * + * Originally based on i2c-mux.c + */ + +#include <linux/i2c-atr.h> +#include <linux/i2c.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/mutex.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> + +/** + * struct i2c_atr_cli2alias_pair - Hold the alias assigned to a client. + * @node: List node + * @client: Pointer to the client on the child bus + * @alias: I2C alias address assigned by the driver. + * This is the address that will be used to issue I2C transactions + * on the parent (physical) bus. + */ +struct i2c_atr_cli2alias_pair { + struct list_head node; + const struct i2c_client *client; + u16 alias; +}; + +/* Data for each channel (child bus) */ +struct i2c_atr_chan { + struct i2c_adapter adap; + struct i2c_atr *atr; + u32 chan_id; + + struct list_head alias_list; + + u16 *orig_addrs; + unsigned int orig_addrs_size; + struct mutex orig_addrs_lock; /* Lock orig_addrs during xfer */ +}; + +static struct i2c_atr_cli2alias_pair * +i2c_atr_find_mapping_by_client(const struct list_head *list, + const struct i2c_client *client) +{ + struct i2c_atr_cli2alias_pair *c2a; + + list_for_each_entry(c2a, list, node) { + if (c2a->client == client) + return c2a; + } + + return NULL; +} + +static struct i2c_atr_cli2alias_pair * +i2c_atr_find_mapping_by_addr(const struct list_head *list, u16 phys_addr) +{ + struct i2c_atr_cli2alias_pair *c2a; + + list_for_each_entry(c2a, list, node) { + if (c2a->client->addr == phys_addr) + return c2a; + } + + return NULL; +} + +/* + * Replace all message addresses with their aliases, saving the original + * addresses. + * + * This function is internal for use in i2c_atr_master_xfer(). It must be + * followed by i2c_atr_unmap_msgs() to restore the original addresses. + */ +static int i2c_atr_map_msgs(struct i2c_atr_chan *chan, struct i2c_msg *msgs, + int num) +{ + struct i2c_atr *atr = chan->atr; + static struct i2c_atr_cli2alias_pair *c2a; + int i; + + /* Ensure we have enough room to save the original addresses */ + if (unlikely(chan->orig_addrs_size < num)) { + void *new_buf = kmalloc_array(num, sizeof(chan->orig_addrs[0]), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (new_buf == NULL) + return -ENOMEM; + + kfree(chan->orig_addrs); + chan->orig_addrs = new_buf; + chan->orig_addrs_size = num; + } + + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { + chan->orig_addrs[i] = msgs[i].addr; + + c2a = i2c_atr_find_mapping_by_addr(&chan->alias_list, + msgs[i].addr); + if (!c2a) { + dev_err(atr->dev, "client 0x%02x not mapped!\n", + msgs[i].addr); + return -ENXIO; + } + + msgs[i].addr = c2a->alias; + } + + return 0; +} + +/* + * Restore all message address aliases with the original addresses. This + * function is internal for use in i2c_atr_master_xfer(). + * + * @see i2c_atr_map_msgs() + */ +static void i2c_atr_unmap_msgs(struct i2c_atr_chan *chan, struct i2c_msg msgs[], + int num) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) + msgs[i].addr = chan->orig_addrs[i]; +} + +static int i2c_atr_master_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[], + int num) +{ + struct i2c_atr_chan *chan = adap->algo_data; + struct i2c_atr *atr = chan->atr; + struct i2c_adapter *parent = atr->parent; + int ret; + + /* Switch to the right atr port */ + if (atr->ops->select) { + ret = atr->ops->select(atr, chan->chan_id); + if (ret < 0) + goto out_deselect; + } + + /* Translate addresses */ + mutex_lock(&chan->orig_addrs_lock); + ret = i2c_atr_map_msgs(chan, msgs, num); + if (ret < 0) + goto out_unlock_deselect; + + /* Perform the transfer */ + ret = i2c_transfer(parent, msgs, num); + + /* Restore addresses */ + i2c_atr_unmap_msgs(chan, msgs, num); + +out_unlock_deselect: + mutex_unlock(&chan->orig_addrs_lock); + +out_deselect: + if (atr->ops->deselect) + atr->ops->deselect(atr, chan->chan_id); + + return ret; +} + +static int i2c_atr_smbus_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, u16 addr, + unsigned short flags, char read_write, u8 command, + int size, union i2c_smbus_data *data) +{ + struct i2c_atr_chan *chan = adap->algo_data; + struct i2c_atr *atr = chan->atr; + struct i2c_adapter *parent = atr->parent; + struct i2c_atr_cli2alias_pair *c2a; + int ret = 0; + + c2a = i2c_atr_find_mapping_by_addr(&chan->alias_list, addr); + if (!c2a) { + dev_err(atr->dev, "client 0x%02x not mapped!\n", addr); + return -ENXIO; + } + + if (atr->ops->select) + ret = atr->ops->select(atr, chan->chan_id); + if (!ret) + ret = i2c_smbus_xfer(parent, c2a->alias, flags, read_write, + command, size, data); + if (atr->ops->deselect) + atr->ops->deselect(atr, chan->chan_id); + + return ret; +} + +static u32 i2c_atr_functionality(struct i2c_adapter *adap) +{ + struct i2c_atr_chan *chan = adap->algo_data; + struct i2c_adapter *parent = chan->atr->parent; + + return parent->algo->functionality(parent); +} + +static void i2c_atr_lock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, unsigned int flags) +{ + struct i2c_atr_chan *chan = adapter->algo_data; + struct i2c_atr *atr = chan->atr; + + mutex_lock(&atr->lock); +} + +static int i2c_atr_trylock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, unsigned int flags) +{ + struct i2c_atr_chan *chan = adapter->algo_data; + struct i2c_atr *atr = chan->atr; + + return mutex_trylock(&atr->lock); +} + +static void i2c_atr_unlock_bus(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, unsigned int flags) +{ + struct i2c_atr_chan *chan = adapter->algo_data; + struct i2c_atr *atr = chan->atr; + + mutex_unlock(&atr->lock); +} + +static const struct i2c_lock_operations i2c_atr_lock_ops = { + .lock_bus = i2c_atr_lock_bus, + .trylock_bus = i2c_atr_trylock_bus, + .unlock_bus = i2c_atr_unlock_bus, +}; + +static int i2c_atr_attach_client(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, + const struct i2c_board_info *info, + const struct i2c_client *client) +{ + struct i2c_atr_chan *chan = adapter->algo_data; + struct i2c_atr *atr = chan->atr; + struct i2c_atr_cli2alias_pair *c2a; + u16 alias_id = 0; + int ret = 0; + + c2a = kzalloc(sizeof(*c2a), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!c2a) + return -ENOMEM; + + ret = atr->ops->attach_client(atr, chan->chan_id, info, client, + &alias_id); + if (ret) + goto err_free; + if (alias_id == 0) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto err_free; + } + + c2a->client = client; + c2a->alias = alias_id; + list_add(&c2a->node, &chan->alias_list); + + return 0; + +err_free: + kfree(c2a); + return ret; +} + +static void i2c_atr_detach_client(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, + const struct i2c_client *client) +{ + struct i2c_atr_chan *chan = adapter->algo_data; + struct i2c_atr *atr = chan->atr; + struct i2c_atr_cli2alias_pair *c2a; + + atr->ops->detach_client(atr, chan->chan_id, client); + + c2a = i2c_atr_find_mapping_by_client(&chan->alias_list, client); + if (c2a) { + list_del(&c2a->node); + kfree(c2a); + } +} + +static const struct i2c_attach_operations i2c_atr_attach_ops = { + .attach_client = i2c_atr_attach_client, + .detach_client = i2c_atr_detach_client, +}; + +/** + * i2c_atr_add_adapter - Create a child ("downstream") I2C bus. + * @atr: The I2C ATR + * @chan_id: Index of the new adapter (0 .. max_adapters-1). This value is + * passed to the callbacks in `struct i2c_atr_ops`. + * @bus_handle: The fwnode handle that points to the adapter's i2c + * peripherals, or NULL. + * + * After calling this function a new i2c bus will appear. Adding and + * removing devices on the downstream bus will result in calls to the + * `attach_client` and `detach_client` callbacks for the driver to assign + * an alias to the device. + * + * The adapter's fwnode is set to 'bus_handle', or if 'bus_handle' is NULL the + * function looks for a child node whose 'reg' property matches the chan_id + * under the i2c-atr device's 'i2c-atr' node. + + * Call i2c_atr_del_adapter() to remove the adapter. + * + * Return: 0 on success, a negative error code otherwise. + */ +int i2c_atr_add_adapter(struct i2c_atr *atr, u32 chan_id, + struct fwnode_handle *bus_handle) +{ + struct i2c_adapter *parent = atr->parent; + struct device *dev = atr->dev; + struct i2c_atr_chan *chan; + char *symlink_name; + int ret; + + if (chan_id >= atr->max_adapters) { + dev_err(dev, "No room for more i2c-atr adapters\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (atr->adapter[chan_id]) { + dev_err(dev, "Adapter %d already present\n", chan_id); + return -EEXIST; + } + + chan = kzalloc(sizeof(*chan), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!chan) + return -ENOMEM; + + chan->atr = atr; + chan->chan_id = chan_id; + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&chan->alias_list); + mutex_init(&chan->orig_addrs_lock); + + snprintf(chan->adap.name, sizeof(chan->adap.name), "i2c-%d-atr-%d", + i2c_adapter_id(parent), chan_id); + chan->adap.owner = THIS_MODULE; + chan->adap.algo = &atr->algo; + chan->adap.algo_data = chan; + chan->adap.dev.parent = dev; + chan->adap.retries = parent->retries; + chan->adap.timeout = parent->timeout; + chan->adap.quirks = parent->quirks; + chan->adap.lock_ops = &i2c_atr_lock_ops; + chan->adap.attach_ops = &i2c_atr_attach_ops; + + if (bus_handle) { + device_set_node(&chan->adap.dev, fwnode_handle_get(bus_handle)); + } else { + struct fwnode_handle *atr_node; + struct fwnode_handle *child; + u32 reg; + + atr_node = device_get_named_child_node(dev, "i2c-atr"); + + fwnode_for_each_child_node(atr_node, child) { + ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reg", ®); + if (ret) + continue; + if (chan_id == reg) + break; + } + + device_set_node(&chan->adap.dev, child); + fwnode_handle_put(atr_node); + } + + ret = i2c_add_adapter(&chan->adap); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "failed to add atr-adapter %u (error=%d)\n", + chan_id, ret); + goto err_add_adapter; + } + + symlink_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "channel-%u", chan_id); + + WARN(sysfs_create_link(&chan->adap.dev.kobj, &dev->kobj, "atr_device"), + "can't create symlink to atr device\n"); + WARN(sysfs_create_link(&dev->kobj, &chan->adap.dev.kobj, symlink_name), + "can't create symlink for channel %u\n", chan_id); + + kfree(symlink_name); + + dev_dbg(dev, "Added ATR child bus %d\n", i2c_adapter_id(&chan->adap)); + + atr->adapter[chan_id] = &chan->adap; + return 0; + +err_add_adapter: + mutex_destroy(&chan->orig_addrs_lock); + kfree(chan); + return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_atr_add_adapter); + +/** + * i2c_atr_del_adapter - Remove a child ("downstream") I2C bus added by + * i2c_atr_del_adapter(). + * @atr: The I2C ATR + * @chan_id: Index of the `adapter to be removed (0 .. max_adapters-1) + */ +void i2c_atr_del_adapter(struct i2c_atr *atr, u32 chan_id) +{ + char symlink_name[20]; + + struct i2c_adapter *adap = atr->adapter[chan_id]; + struct i2c_atr_chan *chan = adap->algo_data; + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = adap->dev.fwnode; + struct device *dev = atr->dev; + + if (atr->adapter[chan_id] == NULL) { + dev_err(dev, "Adapter %d does not exist\n", chan_id); + return; + } + + dev_dbg(dev, "Removing ATR child bus %d\n", i2c_adapter_id(adap)); + + atr->adapter[chan_id] = NULL; + + snprintf(symlink_name, sizeof(symlink_name), + "channel-%u", chan->chan_id); + sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, symlink_name); + sysfs_remove_link(&chan->adap.dev.kobj, "atr_device"); + + i2c_del_adapter(adap); + fwnode_handle_put(fwnode); + mutex_destroy(&chan->orig_addrs_lock); + kfree(chan->orig_addrs); + kfree(chan); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_atr_del_adapter); + +/** + * i2c_atr_new() - Allocate and initialize an I2C ATR helper. + * @parent: The parent (upstream) adapter + * @dev: The device acting as an ATR + * @ops: Driver-specific callbacks + * @max_adapters: Maximum number of child adapters + * + * The new ATR helper is connected to the parent adapter but has no child + * adapters. Call i2c_atr_add_adapter() to add some. + * + * Call i2c_atr_delete() to remove. + * + * Return: pointer to the new ATR helper object, or ERR_PTR + */ +struct i2c_atr *i2c_atr_new(struct i2c_adapter *parent, struct device *dev, + const struct i2c_atr_ops *ops, int max_adapters) +{ + struct i2c_atr *atr; + size_t atr_size; + + if (!ops || !ops->attach_client || !ops->detach_client) + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + + atr_size = struct_size(atr, adapter, max_adapters); + if (atr_size == SIZE_MAX) + return ERR_PTR(-EOVERFLOW); + + atr = devm_kzalloc(dev, atr_size, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!atr) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + + mutex_init(&atr->lock); + + atr->parent = parent; + atr->dev = dev; + atr->ops = ops; + atr->max_adapters = max_adapters; + + if (parent->algo->master_xfer) + atr->algo.master_xfer = i2c_atr_master_xfer; + if (parent->algo->smbus_xfer) + atr->algo.smbus_xfer = i2c_atr_smbus_xfer; + atr->algo.functionality = i2c_atr_functionality; + + return atr; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_atr_new); + +/** + * i2c_atr_delete - Delete an I2C ATR helper. + * @atr: I2C ATR helper to be deleted. + * + * Precondition: all the adapters added with i2c_atr_add_adapter() mumst be + * removed by calling i2c_atr_del_adapter(). + */ +void i2c_atr_delete(struct i2c_atr *atr) +{ + mutex_destroy(&atr->lock); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i2c_atr_delete); + +MODULE_AUTHOR("Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>"); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("I2C Address Translator"); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); diff --git a/include/linux/i2c-atr.h b/include/linux/i2c-atr.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..19ac2f1db96b --- /dev/null +++ b/include/linux/i2c-atr.h @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * I2C Address Translator + * + * Copyright (c) 2019,2022 Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net> + * + * Based on i2c-mux.h + */ + +#ifndef _LINUX_I2C_ATR_H +#define _LINUX_I2C_ATR_H + +#include <linux/i2c.h> +#include <linux/mutex.h> +#include <linux/types.h> + +struct device; +struct i2c_atr; + +/** + * struct i2c_atr_ops - Callbacks from ATR to the device driver. + * @select: Ask the driver to select a child bus (optional) + * @deselect: Ask the driver to deselect a child bus (optional) + * @attach_client: Notify the driver of a new device connected on a child + * bus. The driver must choose an I2C alias, configure the + * hardware to use it and return it in `alias_id`. + * @detach_client: Notify the driver of a device getting disconnected. The + * driver must configure the hardware to stop using the + * alias. + * + * All these functions return 0 on success, a negative error code otherwise. + */ +struct i2c_atr_ops { + int (*select)(struct i2c_atr *atr, u32 chan_id); + int (*deselect)(struct i2c_atr *atr, u32 chan_id); + int (*attach_client)(struct i2c_atr *atr, u32 chan_id, + const struct i2c_board_info *info, + const struct i2c_client *client, u16 *alias_id); + void (*detach_client)(struct i2c_atr *atr, u32 chan_id, + const struct i2c_client *client); +}; + +/** + * Helper to add I2C ATR features to a device driver. + */ +struct i2c_atr { + /* private: internal use only */ + + struct i2c_adapter *parent; + struct device *dev; + const struct i2c_atr_ops *ops; + + void *priv; + + struct i2c_algorithm algo; + struct mutex lock; + int max_adapters; + + struct i2c_adapter *adapter[0]; +}; + +struct i2c_atr *i2c_atr_new(struct i2c_adapter *parent, struct device *dev, + const struct i2c_atr_ops *ops, int max_adapters); +void i2c_atr_delete(struct i2c_atr *atr); + +static inline void i2c_atr_set_clientdata(struct i2c_atr *atr, void *data) +{ + atr->priv = data; +} + +static inline void *i2c_atr_get_clientdata(struct i2c_atr *atr) +{ + return atr->priv; +} + +int i2c_atr_add_adapter(struct i2c_atr *atr, u32 chan_id, + struct fwnode_handle *bus_np); +void i2c_atr_del_adapter(struct i2c_atr *atr, u32 chan_id); + +#endif /* _LINUX_I2C_ATR_H */