Message ID | 20221208013724.257848-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | c2cc0ce72a5ed3e01705e14221d97e96ed7a37b8 |
Delegated to: | BPF |
Headers | show |
Series | [bpf] bpf: Fix comment error in fixup_kfunc_call function | expand |
Hello: This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>: On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 09:37:24 +0800 you wrote: > insn->imm for kfunc is the relative address of __bpf_call_base, > instead of __bpf_base_call, Fix the comment error. > > Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com> > --- > kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Here is the summary with links: - [bpf] bpf: Fix comment error in fixup_kfunc_call function https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c2cc0ce72a5e You are awesome, thank you!
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 264b3dc714cc..ae884a6287c5 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -13889,7 +13889,7 @@ static int fixup_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } /* insn->imm has the btf func_id. Replace it with - * an address (relative to __bpf_base_call). + * an address (relative to __bpf_call_base). */ desc = find_kfunc_desc(env->prog, insn->imm, insn->off); if (!desc) {
insn->imm for kfunc is the relative address of __bpf_call_base, instead of __bpf_base_call, Fix the comment error. Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com> --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)