| Message ID | 20221209103130.572196-2-pierre.gondois@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | arch_topology: Build cacheinfo from primary CPU | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| conchuod/patch_count | success | Link |
| conchuod/cover_letter | success | Series has a cover letter |
| conchuod/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be for-next |
| conchuod/fixes_present | success | Fixes tag not required for -next series |
| conchuod/verify_signedoff | success | Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer |
| conchuod/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| conchuod/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| conchuod/alphanumeric_selects | success | Out of order selects before the patch: 57 and now 57 |
| conchuod/build_rv32_defconfig | success | Build OK |
| conchuod/build_warn_rv64 | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| conchuod/dtb_warn_rv64 | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| conchuod/header_inline | success | No static functions without inline keyword in header files |
| conchuod/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 104 lines checked |
| conchuod/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_k210_defconfig | fail | Build failed |
| conchuod/verify_fixes | success | No Fixes tag |
| conchuod/build_rv64_nommu_virt_defconfig | fail | Build failed |
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 11:31:23AM +0100, Pierre Gondois wrote: > RISC-V's implementation of init_of_cache_level() is following > the Devicetree Specification v0.3 regarding caches, cf.: > - s3.7.3 'Internal (L1) Cache Properties' > - s3.8 'Multi-level and Shared Cache Nodes' > > Allow reusing the implementation by moving it. > > Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> > --- > arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 39 +------------------------------ > drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/cacheinfo.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c > index 90deabfe63ea..440a3df5944c 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c > @@ -115,44 +115,7 @@ static void fill_cacheinfo(struct cacheinfo **this_leaf, > > int init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu) > { > - struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu); > - struct device_node *np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu); > - struct device_node *prev = NULL; > - int levels = 0, leaves = 0, level; > - > - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-size")) > - ++leaves; > - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "i-cache-size")) > - ++leaves; > - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "d-cache-size")) > - ++leaves; > - if (leaves > 0) > - levels = 1; > - > - prev = np; > - while ((np = of_find_next_cache_node(np))) { > - of_node_put(prev); > - prev = np; > - if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "cache")) > - break; > - if (of_property_read_u32(np, "cache-level", &level)) > - break; > - if (level <= levels) > - break; > - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-size")) > - ++leaves; > - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "i-cache-size")) > - ++leaves; > - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "d-cache-size")) > - ++leaves; > - levels = level; > - } > - > - of_node_put(np); > - this_cpu_ci->num_levels = levels; > - this_cpu_ci->num_leaves = leaves; > - > - return 0; > + return init_of_cache_level(cpu); Not in this patch, but in patch 5, shouldn't riscv init_cache_level() be removed? The topology code already called init_of_cache_level() and RiscV has nothing architectural to add/change. IOW, init_cache_level() should only do architecture defined init, and not anything DT or ACPI related (unless those are non-standard). Rob
Hello Rob, On 12/21/22 00:39, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 11:31:23AM +0100, Pierre Gondois wrote: >> RISC-V's implementation of init_of_cache_level() is following >> the Devicetree Specification v0.3 regarding caches, cf.: >> - s3.7.3 'Internal (L1) Cache Properties' >> - s3.8 'Multi-level and Shared Cache Nodes' >> >> Allow reusing the implementation by moving it. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> >> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> >> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> >> --- >> arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 39 +------------------------------ >> drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/linux/cacheinfo.h | 1 + >> 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c >> index 90deabfe63ea..440a3df5944c 100644 >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c >> @@ -115,44 +115,7 @@ static void fill_cacheinfo(struct cacheinfo **this_leaf, >> >> int init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu) >> { >> - struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu); >> - struct device_node *np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu); >> - struct device_node *prev = NULL; >> - int levels = 0, leaves = 0, level; >> - >> - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-size")) >> - ++leaves; >> - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "i-cache-size")) >> - ++leaves; >> - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "d-cache-size")) >> - ++leaves; >> - if (leaves > 0) >> - levels = 1; >> - >> - prev = np; >> - while ((np = of_find_next_cache_node(np))) { >> - of_node_put(prev); >> - prev = np; >> - if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "cache")) >> - break; >> - if (of_property_read_u32(np, "cache-level", &level)) >> - break; >> - if (level <= levels) >> - break; >> - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-size")) >> - ++leaves; >> - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "i-cache-size")) >> - ++leaves; >> - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "d-cache-size")) >> - ++leaves; >> - levels = level; >> - } >> - >> - of_node_put(np); >> - this_cpu_ci->num_levels = levels; >> - this_cpu_ci->num_leaves = leaves; >> - >> - return 0; >> + return init_of_cache_level(cpu); > > Not in this patch, but in patch 5, shouldn't riscv init_cache_level() be > removed? The topology code already called init_of_cache_level() and > RiscV has nothing architectural to add/change. IOW, init_cache_level() > should only do architecture defined init, and not anything DT or ACPI > related (unless those are non-standard). > > Rob I think you are right. Just to re-phrase your point: init_of_cache_level() is called through this path: init_cpu_topology() \-fetch_cache_info() \-init_of_cache_level() If there is missing information in the DT and it's not possible to create the cacheinfo, then the arch specific implementation i.e. init_cache_level() is called through: update_siblings_masks() | cacheinfo_cpu_online() \-detect_cache_attributes() \-init_cache_level() This is useful for arm to call init_cache_level() since it is possible to extract some information from some registers. For RISC-V, if init_of_cache_level() fails, then init_cache_level() will fail again. So removing RISC-V's init_cache_level() makes sense. Regards, Pierre
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c index 90deabfe63ea..440a3df5944c 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c @@ -115,44 +115,7 @@ static void fill_cacheinfo(struct cacheinfo **this_leaf, int init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu) { - struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu); - struct device_node *np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu); - struct device_node *prev = NULL; - int levels = 0, leaves = 0, level; - - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-size")) - ++leaves; - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "i-cache-size")) - ++leaves; - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "d-cache-size")) - ++leaves; - if (leaves > 0) - levels = 1; - - prev = np; - while ((np = of_find_next_cache_node(np))) { - of_node_put(prev); - prev = np; - if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "cache")) - break; - if (of_property_read_u32(np, "cache-level", &level)) - break; - if (level <= levels) - break; - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-size")) - ++leaves; - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "i-cache-size")) - ++leaves; - if (of_property_read_bool(np, "d-cache-size")) - ++leaves; - levels = level; - } - - of_node_put(np); - this_cpu_ci->num_levels = levels; - this_cpu_ci->num_leaves = leaves; - - return 0; + return init_of_cache_level(cpu); } int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu) diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c index 4b5cd08c5a65..a4308b48dd3e 100644 --- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c +++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c @@ -224,8 +224,52 @@ static int cache_setup_of_node(unsigned int cpu) return 0; } + +int init_of_cache_level(unsigned int cpu) +{ + struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu); + struct device_node *np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu); + struct device_node *prev = NULL; + int levels = 0, leaves = 0, level; + + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-size")) + ++leaves; + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "i-cache-size")) + ++leaves; + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "d-cache-size")) + ++leaves; + if (leaves > 0) + levels = 1; + + prev = np; + while ((np = of_find_next_cache_node(np))) { + of_node_put(prev); + prev = np; + if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "cache")) + break; + if (of_property_read_u32(np, "cache-level", &level)) + break; + if (level <= levels) + break; + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-size")) + ++leaves; + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "i-cache-size")) + ++leaves; + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "d-cache-size")) + ++leaves; + levels = level; + } + + of_node_put(np); + this_cpu_ci->num_levels = levels; + this_cpu_ci->num_leaves = leaves; + + return 0; +} + #else static inline int cache_setup_of_node(unsigned int cpu) { return 0; } +int init_of_cache_level(unsigned int cpu) { return 0; } #endif int __weak cache_setup_acpi(unsigned int cpu) diff --git a/include/linux/cacheinfo.h b/include/linux/cacheinfo.h index 00b7a6ae8617..ff0328f3fbb0 100644 --- a/include/linux/cacheinfo.h +++ b/include/linux/cacheinfo.h @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ struct cpu_cacheinfo { struct cpu_cacheinfo *get_cpu_cacheinfo(unsigned int cpu); int init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu); +int init_of_cache_level(unsigned int cpu); int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu); int cache_setup_acpi(unsigned int cpu); bool last_level_cache_is_valid(unsigned int cpu);