| Message ID | 20221216143624.23708-1-sjoerd@collabora.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Improve K3-am625-sk support (USB, MMC) | expand |
On Fri, 2022-12-16 at 15:36 +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > > This series picks up a few patches from the TI BSP tree that > unfortunately didn't make it upstream thusfar. > > The first patch improve SD card compatibility (allowing U1 class > cards > to be used), the remaining ones add USB support. > > The type-c connector isn't entirely modelled with these changes as > it goes through a TPS6598 PD controller. Unfortunately the dtb > bindings > for that currently require an irq line, which is not connected on E1 > and > E2 version boards. The patchese to support this setup unfortunately > didn't land > yet[0].. As such the last patch ignored the PD controller and simply > configures usb0 as periphal only rather then mode switch capable, > which > at least gives some basic usability of that USB port. > > 0: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/f714ee55-ef47-317d-81b9-57020dda064b@ti.com/T/ > > Series tested with known problematic SD Card and checking for detection of inserted USB device. Tested-by: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.com> > Aswath Govindraju (2): > arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-main: Add support for USB > arm64: dts: ti: k3-am625-sk: Add support for USB > > Nitin Yadav (1): > arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-main: Update OTAP and ITAP delay select > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-main.dtsi | 90 ++++++++++++++++++---- > -- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am625-sk.dts | 22 ++++++ > 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) >
Hi, On 16/12/22 8:06 pm, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > > This series picks up a few patches from the TI BSP tree that > unfortunately didn't make it upstream thusfar. > > The first patch improve SD card compatibility (allowing U1 class cards > to be used), the remaining ones add USB support. > > The type-c connector isn't entirely modelled with these changes as > it goes through a TPS6598 PD controller. Unfortunately the dtb bindings > for that currently require an irq line, which is not connected on E1 and > E2 version boards. The patchese to support this setup unfortunately didn't land > yet[0].. As such the last patch ignored the PD controller and simply > configures usb0 as periphal only rather then mode switch capable, which > at least gives some basic usability of that USB port. > > 0: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/f714ee55-ef47-317d-81b9-57020dda064b@ti.com/T/ > > Really appreciate porting and posting these patches to mainline! Wondering what tree are these patches based on? I cannot apply cleanly on linux-next. > Aswath Govindraju (2): > arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-main: Add support for USB > arm64: dts: ti: k3-am625-sk: Add support for USB > > Nitin Yadav (1): > arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-main: Update OTAP and ITAP delay select > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-main.dtsi | 90 ++++++++++++++++++------ > arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am625-sk.dts | 22 ++++++ > 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > Regards Vignesh
Hey Vignesh, On Tue, 2022-12-20 at 17:02 +0530, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote: > Hi, > > On 16/12/22 8:06 pm, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > > > > This series picks up a few patches from the TI BSP tree that > > unfortunately didn't make it upstream thusfar. ... > > 0: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/f714ee55-ef47-317d-81b9-57020dda064b@ti.com/T/ > > > > > Really appreciate porting and posting these patches to mainline! > Wondering what tree are these patches based on? > I cannot apply cleanly on linux-next. These are against Linux 6.1 ; I'll happy rebase agains next for the next round or is there a specific tree you prefer to base against? Regards,
Hi Sjoerd On 12/20/2022 6:11 PM, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > Hey Vignesh, > > On Tue, 2022-12-20 at 17:02 +0530, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 16/12/22 8:06 pm, Sjoerd Simons wrote: >>> >>> This series picks up a few patches from the TI BSP tree that >>> unfortunately didn't make it upstream thusfar. > ... >>> 0: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/f714ee55-ef47-317d-81b9-57020dda064b@ti.com/T/ >>> >>> >> Really appreciate porting and posting these patches to mainline! >> Wondering what tree are these patches based on? >> I cannot apply cleanly on linux-next. > > These are against Linux 6.1 ; I'll happy rebase agains next for the > next round or is there a specific tree you prefer to base against? > TI K3 patch queue is at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ti/linux.git ti-next This is part of linux-next. So, yes, I would like all patches to be based on -next or above tree. I see you have already done that in v2.. Thanks! Regards Vignesh