| Message ID | 20230113033347.264135-1-xiaoning.wang@nxp.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add eqos and fec support for imx93 | expand |
Hi, On Fri, 2023-01-13 at 11:33 +0800, Clark Wang wrote: > This patchset add imx93 support for dwmac-imx glue driver. > There are some changes of GPR implement. > And add fec and eqos nodes for imx93 dts. > > Clark Wang (7): > net: stmmac: add imx93 platform support > dt-bindings: add mx93 description > dt-bindings: net: fec: add mx93 description > arm64: dts: imx93: add eqos support > arm64: dts: imx93: add FEC support > arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: enable eqos > arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: enable fec function > > .../devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,fec.yaml | 1 + > .../bindings/net/nxp,dwmac-imx.yaml | 4 +- > .../boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts | 78 +++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi | 48 ++++++++++++ > .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-imx.c | 55 +++++++++++-- > 5 files changed, 180 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) It's not clear to me if the whole series should go via netdev. I think/fear such option could cause later conflicts for Linus. Does it make sense to split this in 2 chunks, and have only the first 3 patches merged via netdev? Thanks! Paolo
Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master) by David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>: On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 11:33:40 +0800 you wrote: > Hi, > > This patchset add imx93 support for dwmac-imx glue driver. > There are some changes of GPR implement. > And add fec and eqos nodes for imx93 dts. > > Clark Wang (7): > net: stmmac: add imx93 platform support > dt-bindings: add mx93 description > dt-bindings: net: fec: add mx93 description > arm64: dts: imx93: add eqos support > arm64: dts: imx93: add FEC support > arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: enable eqos > arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: enable fec function > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [V2,1/7] net: stmmac: add imx93 platform support https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/e5bf35ca4547 - [V2,2/7] dt-bindings: add mx93 description https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/b2274ffe90be - [V2,3/7] dt-bindings: net: fec: add mx93 description https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/f743e7664dca - [V2,4/7] arm64: dts: imx93: add eqos support https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/1f4263ea6a4b - [V2,5/7] arm64: dts: imx93: add FEC support https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/eaaf47108540 - [V2,6/7] arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: enable eqos https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/1b110dd678d9 - [V2,7/7] arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: enable fec function https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/c897dc7f3a8d You are awesome, thank you!
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 09:27:56AM +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 2023-01-13 at 11:33 +0800, Clark Wang wrote: > > This patchset add imx93 support for dwmac-imx glue driver. > > There are some changes of GPR implement. > > And add fec and eqos nodes for imx93 dts. > > > > Clark Wang (7): > > net: stmmac: add imx93 platform support > > dt-bindings: add mx93 description > > dt-bindings: net: fec: add mx93 description > > arm64: dts: imx93: add eqos support > > arm64: dts: imx93: add FEC support > > arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: enable eqos > > arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: enable fec function > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,fec.yaml | 1 + > > .../bindings/net/nxp,dwmac-imx.yaml | 4 +- > > .../boot/dts/freescale/imx93-11x11-evk.dts | 78 +++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi | 48 ++++++++++++ > > .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-imx.c | 55 +++++++++++-- > > 5 files changed, 180 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > It's not clear to me if the whole series should go via netdev. I > think/fear such option could cause later conflicts for Linus. Does it > make sense to split this in 2 chunks, and have only the first 3 patches > merged via netdev? I share the same concern here. David, Could you *not* apply DTS patches in the future? People often include driver changes and corresponding DTS ones in a single series to ease cross reviewing and testing. If picking selected patches from a series could a problem for your applying robot, we should probably start asking people to split change-sets. Shawn