Message ID | 20220620162704.80987-1-hreitz@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | qemu-img info: Show protocol-level information | expand |
On 20.06.22 18:26, Hanna Reitz wrote: > Hi, > > This series is a v2 to: > > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2022-05/msg00042.html Ping, it looks like this still applies (to the master branch and kevin’s block-next branch at least). Hanna > So the final state is that despite the QAPI changes, hopefully only the > qemu-img info output changes, and it now prints every image node’s > subgraph. This results in an output like the following (for a qcow2 > image): > > image: test.qcow2 > file format: qcow2 > virtual size: 64 MiB (67108864 bytes) > disk size: 196 KiB > cluster_size: 65536 > Format specific information: > compat: 1.1 > compression type: zlib > lazy refcounts: false > refcount bits: 16 > corrupt: false > extended l2: false > Child node '/file': > filename: test.qcow2 > protocol type: file > file length: 192 KiB (197120 bytes) > disk size: 196 KiB > Format specific information: > extent size hint: 1048576
Am 08.12.2022 um 13:24 hat Hanna Reitz geschrieben: > On 20.06.22 18:26, Hanna Reitz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This series is a v2 to: > > > > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2022-05/msg00042.html > > Ping, it looks like this still applies (to the master branch and kevin’s > block-next branch at least). Not any more. :-) But the conflicts seemed obvious enough, so I rebased it (including changing the "Since: 7.1" occurrences to 8.0) and applied it to my block branch. Thanks! Kevin
On 19.01.23 21:12, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 08.12.2022 um 13:24 hat Hanna Reitz geschrieben: >> On 20.06.22 18:26, Hanna Reitz wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> This series is a v2 to: >>> >>> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2022-05/msg00042.html >> Ping, it looks like this still applies (to the master branch and kevin’s >> block-next branch at least). > Not any more. :-) > > But the conflicts seemed obvious enough, so I rebased it (including > changing the "Since: 7.1" occurrences to 8.0) and applied it to my block > branch. Ah, yes. That I should have fixed. > Thanks! Thank you! :) Hanna