diff mbox series

[04/18] cxl/region: Validate region mode vs decoder mode

Message ID 167564537131.847146.9020072654741860107.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series CXL RAM and the 'Soft Reserved' => 'System RAM' default | expand

Commit Message

Dan Williams Feb. 6, 2023, 1:02 a.m. UTC
In preparation for a new region mode, do not, for example, allow
'ram' decoders to be assigned to 'pmem' regions and vice versa.

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 drivers/cxl/core/region.c |    6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

Comments

Jonathan Cameron Feb. 6, 2023, 4:02 p.m. UTC | #1
On Sun, 05 Feb 2023 17:02:51 -0800
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:

> In preparation for a new region mode, do not, for example, allow
> 'ram' decoders to be assigned to 'pmem' regions and vice versa.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

I guess we aren't support mixed endpoint decoders for now (and
maybe never..) If we did I'd expect this to have to allow
mixed with either RAM or PMEM.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/region.c |    6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index c9e7f05caa0f..53d6dbe4de6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> @@ -1217,6 +1217,12 @@ static int cxl_region_attach(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
>  	struct cxl_dport *dport;
>  	int i, rc = -ENXIO;
>  
> +	if (cxled->mode != cxlr->mode) {
> +		dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev, "%s region mode: %d mismatch: %d\n",
> +			dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev), cxlr->mode, cxled->mode);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (cxled->mode == CXL_DECODER_DEAD) {
>  		dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev, "%s dead\n", dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev));
>  		return -ENODEV;
>
Gregory Price Feb. 6, 2023, 4:44 p.m. UTC | #2
On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 05:02:51PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> In preparation for a new region mode, do not, for example, allow
> 'ram' decoders to be assigned to 'pmem' regions and vice versa.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/region.c |    6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index c9e7f05caa0f..53d6dbe4de6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> @@ -1217,6 +1217,12 @@ static int cxl_region_attach(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
>  	struct cxl_dport *dport;
>  	int i, rc = -ENXIO;
>  
> +	if (cxled->mode != cxlr->mode) {
> +		dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev, "%s region mode: %d mismatch: %d\n",
> +			dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev), cxlr->mode, cxled->mode);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (cxled->mode == CXL_DECODER_DEAD) {
>  		dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev, "%s dead\n", dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev));
>  		return -ENODEV;
> 


Maybe a stupid question.  It will be entirely possible to "convert" pmem
to "ram" (i.e. just online it as system memory).

Are type-3 devices with pmem expected to carry 2 decoders (one ram, 1
pmem), such that you can create a ram region from pmem, or is it expected
that the pmem decoder will be used for pmem, even if it gets onlined
as volatile?

Just asking because depending on how that flushes out, you might
expected a "ram region" to get assigned to a "pmem decoder", unless
you're expecting all pmem-carrying-devices to create 2 decoders per pmem
region depending on how the end user intends to use it.

~Gregory
Dan Williams Feb. 6, 2023, 6:14 p.m. UTC | #3
Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Feb 2023 17:02:51 -0800
> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > In preparation for a new region mode, do not, for example, allow
> > 'ram' decoders to be assigned to 'pmem' regions and vice versa.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> 
> I guess we aren't support mixed endpoint decoders for now (and
> maybe never..) If we did I'd expect this to have to allow
> mixed with either RAM or PMEM.

Mixed is a bug, or I otherwise can not think of a scenario where it is
valid. The kernel prevents it, but platform firmware can make
that mistake. I think if the kernel ever encounters that and works
around it that will come with a loud TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND warning.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cxl/core/region.c |    6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> > index c9e7f05caa0f..53d6dbe4de6d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> > @@ -1217,6 +1217,12 @@ static int cxl_region_attach(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
> >  	struct cxl_dport *dport;
> >  	int i, rc = -ENXIO;
> >  
> > +	if (cxled->mode != cxlr->mode) {
> > +		dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev, "%s region mode: %d mismatch: %d\n",
> > +			dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev), cxlr->mode, cxled->mode);
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	if (cxled->mode == CXL_DECODER_DEAD) {
> >  		dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev, "%s dead\n", dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev));
> >  		return -ENODEV;
> > 
>
Ira Weiny Feb. 6, 2023, 7:23 p.m. UTC | #4
Dan Williams wrote:
> In preparation for a new region mode, do not, for example, allow
> 'ram' decoders to be assigned to 'pmem' regions and vice versa.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Gregory Price Feb. 6, 2023, 7:55 p.m. UTC | #5
On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 01:51:18PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> Gregory Price wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 05:02:51PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > In preparation for a new region mode, do not, for example, allow
> > > 'ram' decoders to be assigned to 'pmem' regions and vice versa.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/cxl/core/region.c |    6 ++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > > 
[...]

sounds good, thanks for the explanation

Reviewed-by: Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com>
Dan Williams Feb. 6, 2023, 9:51 p.m. UTC | #6
Gregory Price wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 05:02:51PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > In preparation for a new region mode, do not, for example, allow
> > 'ram' decoders to be assigned to 'pmem' regions and vice versa.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cxl/core/region.c |    6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> > index c9e7f05caa0f..53d6dbe4de6d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> > @@ -1217,6 +1217,12 @@ static int cxl_region_attach(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
> >  	struct cxl_dport *dport;
> >  	int i, rc = -ENXIO;
> >  
> > +	if (cxled->mode != cxlr->mode) {
> > +		dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev, "%s region mode: %d mismatch: %d\n",
> > +			dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev), cxlr->mode, cxled->mode);
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	if (cxled->mode == CXL_DECODER_DEAD) {
> >  		dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev, "%s dead\n", dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev));
> >  		return -ENODEV;
> > 
> 
> 
> Maybe a stupid question.  It will be entirely possible to "convert" pmem
> to "ram" (i.e. just online it as system memory).

That's a good question, there are two mechanisms for this:

1/ Use ndctl to assign the resulting pmem namespace to devdax mode and
   then use dax_kmem to online that persistent memory.

2/ If the CXL device supports partitioning ram vs pmem capacity: tear down
   the pmem region ('cxl destroy-region ...'), repartition the pmem ('cxl
   set-partition -t ram ...'), create a new ram region ('cxl create-region
   ...').

> Are type-3 devices with pmem expected to carry 2 decoders (one ram, 1
> pmem), such that you can create a ram region from pmem, or is it expected
> that the pmem decoder will be used for pmem, even if it gets onlined
> as volatile?

Not sure there are any formal expectations when it comes to number of
decoders.

> Just asking because depending on how that flushes out, you might
> expected a "ram region" to get assigned to a "pmem decoder", unless
> you're expecting all pmem-carrying-devices to create 2 decoders per pmem
> region depending on how the end user intends to use it.

Per 2/ above even with a 1-decoder-device there is a spec-defined
mechanism to assign all of the device's capacity to ram.
Dave Jiang Feb. 6, 2023, 10:16 p.m. UTC | #7
On 2/5/23 6:02 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> In preparation for a new region mode, do not, for example, allow
> 'ram' decoders to be assigned to 'pmem' regions and vice versa.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/cxl/core/region.c |    6 ++++++
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index c9e7f05caa0f..53d6dbe4de6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> @@ -1217,6 +1217,12 @@ static int cxl_region_attach(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
>   	struct cxl_dport *dport;
>   	int i, rc = -ENXIO;
>   
> +	if (cxled->mode != cxlr->mode) {
> +		dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev, "%s region mode: %d mismatch: %d\n",
> +			dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev), cxlr->mode, cxled->mode);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
>   	if (cxled->mode == CXL_DECODER_DEAD) {
>   		dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev, "%s dead\n", dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev));
>   		return -ENODEV;
>
Verma, Vishal L Feb. 9, 2023, 12:25 a.m. UTC | #8
On Sun, 2023-02-05 at 17:02 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> In preparation for a new region mode, do not, for example, allow
> 'ram' decoders to be assigned to 'pmem' regions and vice versa.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/region.c |    6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>

> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> index c9e7f05caa0f..53d6dbe4de6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
> @@ -1217,6 +1217,12 @@ static int cxl_region_attach(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
>         struct cxl_dport *dport;
>         int i, rc = -ENXIO;
>  
> +       if (cxled->mode != cxlr->mode) {
> +               dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev, "%s region mode: %d mismatch: %d\n",
> +                       dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev), cxlr->mode, cxled->mode);
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       }
> +
>         if (cxled->mode == CXL_DECODER_DEAD) {
>                 dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev, "%s dead\n", dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev));
>                 return -ENODEV;
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
index c9e7f05caa0f..53d6dbe4de6d 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/core/region.c
@@ -1217,6 +1217,12 @@  static int cxl_region_attach(struct cxl_region *cxlr,
 	struct cxl_dport *dport;
 	int i, rc = -ENXIO;
 
+	if (cxled->mode != cxlr->mode) {
+		dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev, "%s region mode: %d mismatch: %d\n",
+			dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev), cxlr->mode, cxled->mode);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	if (cxled->mode == CXL_DECODER_DEAD) {
 		dev_dbg(&cxlr->dev, "%s dead\n", dev_name(&cxled->cxld.dev));
 		return -ENODEV;