| Message ID | 20230208101545.45711-4-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 7c855ef7137a67bcff0e039691b969428dd8ef6a |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2,1/7] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: align RPM G-Link node with bindings | expand |
On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 11:15:42 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Qualcomm G-Link RPM edge bindings do not allow and do not use mbox-names > property. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > > --- > > Changes since v1: > 1. None. > 2. Previously was sent as separate patch. > > There are no strict dependencies. This can go anytime. The next patch > (glink-rpm-edge) should be applied in the same or later cycle (could be > via different trees). > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 4:16 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote: > > Qualcomm G-Link RPM edge bindings do not allow and do not use mbox-names > property. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > > --- > > Changes since v1: > 1. None. > 2. Previously was sent as separate patch. > > There are no strict dependencies. This can go anytime. The next patch > (glink-rpm-edge) should be applied in the same or later cycle (could be > via different trees). Except that without this patch there is now a warning in linux-next. Rob
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 11:15:42AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Qualcomm G-Link RPM edge bindings do not allow and do not use mbox-names > property. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > > --- > > Changes since v1: > 1. None. > 2. Previously was sent as separate patch. > > There are no strict dependencies. This can go anytime. The next patch > (glink-rpm-edge) should be applied in the same or later cycle (could be > via different trees). Jassi, I missed this note and merged the following patches, introducing the forecasted issue in linux-next. To remedy this, I took the liberty of merging this patch as well into the remoteproc tree. Regards, Bjorn > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml > index 943f9472ae10..56b386b688b3 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml > @@ -155,7 +155,6 @@ examples: > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 168 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; > qcom,rpm-msg-ram = <&rpm_msg_ram>; > mboxes = <&apcs_glb 0>; > - mbox-names = "rpm_hlos"; > }; > > # Example apcs with qcs404 > -- > 2.34.1 >
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 1:19 PM Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 11:15:42AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > Qualcomm G-Link RPM edge bindings do not allow and do not use mbox-names > > property. > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > > > > --- > > > > Changes since v1: > > 1. None. > > 2. Previously was sent as separate patch. > > > > There are no strict dependencies. This can go anytime. The next patch > > (glink-rpm-edge) should be applied in the same or later cycle (could be > > via different trees). > > Jassi, I missed this note and merged the following patches, introducing > the forecasted issue in linux-next. To remedy this, I took the liberty > of merging this patch as well into the remoteproc tree. > No problem. Cheers.
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml index 943f9472ae10..56b386b688b3 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml @@ -155,7 +155,6 @@ examples: interrupts = <GIC_SPI 168 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; qcom,rpm-msg-ram = <&rpm_msg_ram>; mboxes = <&apcs_glb 0>; - mbox-names = "rpm_hlos"; }; # Example apcs with qcs404
Qualcomm G-Link RPM edge bindings do not allow and do not use mbox-names property. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> --- Changes since v1: 1. None. 2. Previously was sent as separate patch. There are no strict dependencies. This can go anytime. The next patch (glink-rpm-edge) should be applied in the same or later cycle (could be via different trees). --- .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)