Message ID | cover.1676424378.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Change the return value for page isolation functions | expand |
This v3 series looks like it's making things more readable, so ack as far as I'm concerned. But it looks like it's firmly in the "Andrew's mm tree" category, so I'll leave it up to him to decide. Linus
Hi Baolin, On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 18:39:33 +0800 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > Now the page isolation functions did not return a boolean to indicate > success or not, instead it will return a negative error when failed > to isolate a page. So below code used in most places seem a boolean > success/failure thing, which can confuse people whether the isolation > is successful. > > if (folio_isolate_lru(folio)) > continue; > > Moreover the page isolation functions only return 0 or -EBUSY, and > most users did not care about the negative error except for few users, > thus we can convert all page isolation functions to return a boolean > value, which can remove the confusion to make code more clear. > > No functional changes intended in this patch series. For the series, Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> Thanks, SJ [...]