diff mbox series

[v2,07/14] drm/msm/a6xx: Add support for A619_holi

Message ID 20230214173145.2482651-8-konrad.dybcio@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v2,01/14] drm/msm/a6xx: De-staticize sptprac en/disable functions | expand

Commit Message

Konrad Dybcio Feb. 14, 2023, 5:31 p.m. UTC
A619_holi is a GMU-less variant of the already-supported A619 GPU.
It's present on at least SM4350 (holi) and SM6375 (blair). No mesa
changes are required. Add the required kernel-side support for it.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c      | 37 +++++++++++++++++-----
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c | 13 ++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h    |  5 +++
 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Comments

Dmitry Baryshkov Feb. 17, 2023, 9:19 p.m. UTC | #1
On 14/02/2023 19:31, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> A619_holi is a GMU-less variant of the already-supported A619 GPU.
> It's present on at least SM4350 (holi) and SM6375 (blair). No mesa
> changes are required. Add the required kernel-side support for it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c      | 37 +++++++++++++++++-----
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c | 13 ++++++++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h    |  5 +++
>   3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> index 75cf94b03c29..c168712a0dc4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
> @@ -614,14 +614,14 @@ static void a6xx_set_hwcg(struct msm_gpu *gpu, bool state)
>   		return;
>   
>   	/* Disable SP clock before programming HWCG registers */
> -	if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
> +	if ((!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu)))

Extra parenthesis made me interpret this incorrectly. Maybe you can 
remove them and spit the condition onto two lines? Because my first 
interpretation was:
if (!(has_gmu_wrapper || a619_holi)).


>   		gmu_rmw(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_GX_SPTPRAC_CLOCK_CONTROL, 1, 0);
>   
>   	for (i = 0; (reg = &adreno_gpu->info->hwcg[i], reg->offset); i++)
>   		gpu_write(gpu, reg->offset, state ? reg->value : 0);
>   
>   	/* Enable SP clock */
> -	if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
> +	if ((!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu)))
>   		gmu_rmw(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_GX_SPTPRAC_CLOCK_CONTROL, 0, 1);
>   
>   	gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_CLOCK_CNTL, state ? clock_cntl_on : 0);
> @@ -1007,7 +1007,12 @@ static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>   	}
>   
>   	/* Clear GBIF halt in case GX domain was not collapsed */
> -	if (a6xx_has_gbif(adreno_gpu)) {
> +	if (adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu)) {
> +		gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT, 0);
> +		gpu_write(gpu, 0x18, 0);
> +		/* Let's make extra sure that the GPU can access the memory.. */
> +		mb();
> +	} else if (a6xx_has_gbif(adreno_gpu)) {
>   		gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT, 0);
>   		gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT, 0);
>   		/* Let's make extra sure that the GPU can access the memory.. */
> @@ -1016,6 +1021,9 @@ static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>   
>   	gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_SECVID_TSB_CNTL, 0);
>   
> +	if (adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu))
> +		a6xx_sptprac_enable(gmu);
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * Disable the trusted memory range - we don't actually supported secure
>   	 * memory rendering at this point in time and we don't want to block off
> @@ -1293,7 +1301,8 @@ static void a6xx_dump(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>   #define GBIF_CLIENT_HALT_MASK	BIT(0)
>   #define GBIF_ARB_HALT_MASK	BIT(1)
>   #define VBIF_RESET_ACK_TIMEOUT	100
> -#define VBIF_RESET_ACK_MASK	0x00f0
> +#define VBIF_RESET_ACK_MASK	0xF0
> +#define GPR0_GBIF_HALT_REQUEST	0x1E0
>   
>   static void a6xx_recover(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>   {
> @@ -1350,10 +1359,16 @@ static void a6xx_recover(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>   
>   	/* Software-reset the GPU */
>   	if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
> -		/* Halt the GX side of GBIF */
> -		gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT, GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK);
> -		spin_until(gpu_read(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT_ACK) &
> -			   GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK);
> +		if (adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu)) {
> +			gpu_write(gpu, 0x18, GPR0_GBIF_HALT_REQUEST);
> +			spin_until((gpu_read(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_VBIF_GX_RESET_STATUS) &
> +				   (VBIF_RESET_ACK_MASK)) == VBIF_RESET_ACK_MASK);
> +		} else {
> +			/* Halt the GX side of GBIF */
> +			gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT, GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK);
> +			spin_until(gpu_read(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT_ACK) &
> +				   GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK);
> +		}
>   
>   		/* Halt new client requests on GBIF */
>   		gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT, GBIF_CLIENT_HALT_MASK);
> @@ -1763,6 +1778,9 @@ static int a6xx_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>   		if (ret)
>   			return ret;
>   
> +		if (adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu))
> +			a6xx_sptprac_enable(gmu);
> +
>   		mutex_unlock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
>   
>   		msm_devfreq_resume(gpu);
> @@ -1795,6 +1813,9 @@ static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>   
>   		mutex_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
>   
> +		if (adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu))
> +			a6xx_sptprac_disable(gmu);
> +
>   		ret = clk_prepare_enable(gpu->ebi1_clk);
>   		if (ret)
>   			return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
> index 82757f005a1a..71faeb3fd466 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
> @@ -264,6 +264,19 @@ static const struct adreno_info gpulist[] = {
>   		.gmem = SZ_512K,
>   		.inactive_period = DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD,
>   		.init = a6xx_gpu_init,
> +	}, {
> +		.rev = ADRENO_REV(6, 1, 9, 1),

I think this deserves a comment that GMU-enabled sm6350 has patch_id 0 
(if I interpreted the vendor dtsi correctly).

Another option might be to actually check for the qcom,gmu presense and 
add that to the selection conditional.

> +		.revn = 619,
> +		.name = "A619_holi",
> +		.fw = {
> +			[ADRENO_FW_SQE] = "a630_sqe.fw",
> +		},
> +		.gmem = SZ_512K,
> +		.inactive_period = DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD,
> +		.quirks = ADRENO_QUIRK_GMU_WRAPPER,
> +		.init = a6xx_gpu_init,
> +		.zapfw = "a615_zap.mdt",
> +		.hwcg = a615_hwcg,
>   	}, {
>   		.rev = ADRENO_REV(6, 1, 9, ANY_ID),
>   		.revn = 619,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
> index 7c5e0a90b5fb..16241368c2e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
> @@ -252,6 +252,11 @@ static inline int adreno_is_a619(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>   	return gpu->revn == 619;
>   }
>   
> +static inline int adreno_is_a619_holi(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
> +{
> +	return adreno_is_a619(gpu) && adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(gpu);
> +}
> +
>   static inline int adreno_is_a630(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>   {
>   	return gpu->revn == 630;
Konrad Dybcio Feb. 17, 2023, 9:21 p.m. UTC | #2
On 17.02.2023 22:19, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 14/02/2023 19:31, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> A619_holi is a GMU-less variant of the already-supported A619 GPU.
>> It's present on at least SM4350 (holi) and SM6375 (blair). No mesa
>> changes are required. Add the required kernel-side support for it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c      | 37 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c | 13 ++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h    |  5 +++
>>   3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>> index 75cf94b03c29..c168712a0dc4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
>> @@ -614,14 +614,14 @@ static void a6xx_set_hwcg(struct msm_gpu *gpu, bool state)
>>           return;
>>         /* Disable SP clock before programming HWCG registers */
>> -    if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
>> +    if ((!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu)))
> 
> Extra parenthesis made me interpret this incorrectly. Maybe you can remove them and spit the condition onto two lines? Because my first interpretation was:
> if (!(has_gmu_wrapper || a619_holi)).
Yeah, I agree this is confusing.. will fix.

> 
> 
>>           gmu_rmw(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_GX_SPTPRAC_CLOCK_CONTROL, 1, 0);
>>         for (i = 0; (reg = &adreno_gpu->info->hwcg[i], reg->offset); i++)
>>           gpu_write(gpu, reg->offset, state ? reg->value : 0);
>>         /* Enable SP clock */
>> -    if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
>> +    if ((!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu)))
>>           gmu_rmw(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_GX_SPTPRAC_CLOCK_CONTROL, 0, 1);
>>         gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_CLOCK_CNTL, state ? clock_cntl_on : 0);
>> @@ -1007,7 +1007,12 @@ static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>       }
>>         /* Clear GBIF halt in case GX domain was not collapsed */
>> -    if (a6xx_has_gbif(adreno_gpu)) {
>> +    if (adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu)) {
>> +        gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT, 0);
>> +        gpu_write(gpu, 0x18, 0);
>> +        /* Let's make extra sure that the GPU can access the memory.. */
>> +        mb();
>> +    } else if (a6xx_has_gbif(adreno_gpu)) {
>>           gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT, 0);
>>           gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT, 0);
>>           /* Let's make extra sure that the GPU can access the memory.. */
>> @@ -1016,6 +1021,9 @@ static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>         gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_SECVID_TSB_CNTL, 0);
>>   +    if (adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu))
>> +        a6xx_sptprac_enable(gmu);
>> +
>>       /*
>>        * Disable the trusted memory range - we don't actually supported secure
>>        * memory rendering at this point in time and we don't want to block off
>> @@ -1293,7 +1301,8 @@ static void a6xx_dump(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>   #define GBIF_CLIENT_HALT_MASK    BIT(0)
>>   #define GBIF_ARB_HALT_MASK    BIT(1)
>>   #define VBIF_RESET_ACK_TIMEOUT    100
>> -#define VBIF_RESET_ACK_MASK    0x00f0
>> +#define VBIF_RESET_ACK_MASK    0xF0
>> +#define GPR0_GBIF_HALT_REQUEST    0x1E0
>>     static void a6xx_recover(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>   {
>> @@ -1350,10 +1359,16 @@ static void a6xx_recover(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>         /* Software-reset the GPU */
>>       if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
>> -        /* Halt the GX side of GBIF */
>> -        gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT, GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK);
>> -        spin_until(gpu_read(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT_ACK) &
>> -               GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK);
>> +        if (adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu)) {
>> +            gpu_write(gpu, 0x18, GPR0_GBIF_HALT_REQUEST);
>> +            spin_until((gpu_read(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_VBIF_GX_RESET_STATUS) &
>> +                   (VBIF_RESET_ACK_MASK)) == VBIF_RESET_ACK_MASK);
>> +        } else {
>> +            /* Halt the GX side of GBIF */
>> +            gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT, GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK);
>> +            spin_until(gpu_read(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT_ACK) &
>> +                   GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK);
>> +        }
>>             /* Halt new client requests on GBIF */
>>           gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT, GBIF_CLIENT_HALT_MASK);
>> @@ -1763,6 +1778,9 @@ static int a6xx_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>           if (ret)
>>               return ret;
>>   +        if (adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu))
>> +            a6xx_sptprac_enable(gmu);
>> +
>>           mutex_unlock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
>>             msm_devfreq_resume(gpu);
>> @@ -1795,6 +1813,9 @@ static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>>             mutex_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
>>   +        if (adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu))
>> +            a6xx_sptprac_disable(gmu);
>> +
>>           ret = clk_prepare_enable(gpu->ebi1_clk);
>>           if (ret)
>>               return ret;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>> index 82757f005a1a..71faeb3fd466 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>> @@ -264,6 +264,19 @@ static const struct adreno_info gpulist[] = {
>>           .gmem = SZ_512K,
>>           .inactive_period = DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD,
>>           .init = a6xx_gpu_init,
>> +    }, {
>> +        .rev = ADRENO_REV(6, 1, 9, 1),
> 
> I think this deserves a comment that GMU-enabled sm6350 has patch_id 0 (if I interpreted the vendor dtsi correctly).
> 
> Another option might be to actually check for the qcom,gmu presense and add that to the selection conditional.
We pass the GMU wrapper in qcom,gmu = <>, though perhaps setting
the holi-ness based on whether it's "qcom,gmu-x.y.z.a" or
"qcom,gmu-wrapper" would be wiser.. The patch ID is indeterminate
and I *think* one GMU-wrapper A619 has patch id 0..

Konrad
> 
>> +        .revn = 619,
>> +        .name = "A619_holi",
>> +        .fw = {
>> +            [ADRENO_FW_SQE] = "a630_sqe.fw",
>> +        },
>> +        .gmem = SZ_512K,
>> +        .inactive_period = DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD,
>> +        .quirks = ADRENO_QUIRK_GMU_WRAPPER,
>> +        .init = a6xx_gpu_init,
>> +        .zapfw = "a615_zap.mdt",
>> +        .hwcg = a615_hwcg,
>>       }, {
>>           .rev = ADRENO_REV(6, 1, 9, ANY_ID),
>>           .revn = 619,
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>> index 7c5e0a90b5fb..16241368c2e4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>> @@ -252,6 +252,11 @@ static inline int adreno_is_a619(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>       return gpu->revn == 619;
>>   }
>>   +static inline int adreno_is_a619_holi(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>> +{
>> +    return adreno_is_a619(gpu) && adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(gpu);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static inline int adreno_is_a630(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>   {
>>       return gpu->revn == 630;
>
Dmitry Baryshkov Feb. 18, 2023, 1:04 p.m. UTC | #3
On 17/02/2023 23:21, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 17.02.2023 22:19, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 14/02/2023 19:31, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> A619_holi is a GMU-less variant of the already-supported A619 GPU.
>>> It's present on at least SM4350 (holi) and SM6375 (blair). No mesa
>>> changes are required. Add the required kernel-side support for it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c      | 37 +++++++++++++++++-----
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c | 13 ++++++++
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h    |  5 +++
>>>    3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

[...]


>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>>> index 82757f005a1a..71faeb3fd466 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
>>> @@ -264,6 +264,19 @@ static const struct adreno_info gpulist[] = {
>>>            .gmem = SZ_512K,
>>>            .inactive_period = DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD,
>>>            .init = a6xx_gpu_init,
>>> +    }, {
>>> +        .rev = ADRENO_REV(6, 1, 9, 1),
>>
>> I think this deserves a comment that GMU-enabled sm6350 has patch_id 0 (if I interpreted the vendor dtsi correctly).
>>
>> Another option might be to actually check for the qcom,gmu presense and add that to the selection conditional.
> We pass the GMU wrapper in qcom,gmu = <>, though perhaps setting
> the holi-ness based on whether it's "qcom,gmu-x.y.z.a" or
> "qcom,gmu-wrapper" would be wiser.. The patch ID is indeterminate
> and I *think* one GMU-wrapper A619 has patch id 0..

I was not aware that GMU-wrapper also adds a GMU device. In this case, 
checking the GMU's compatible strings sounds like a logical approach to me.

> 
> Konrad
>>
>>> +        .revn = 619,
>>> +        .name = "A619_holi",
>>> +        .fw = {
>>> +            [ADRENO_FW_SQE] = "a630_sqe.fw",
>>> +        },
>>> +        .gmem = SZ_512K,
>>> +        .inactive_period = DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD,
>>> +        .quirks = ADRENO_QUIRK_GMU_WRAPPER,
>>> +        .init = a6xx_gpu_init,
>>> +        .zapfw = "a615_zap.mdt",
>>> +        .hwcg = a615_hwcg,
>>>        }, {
>>>            .rev = ADRENO_REV(6, 1, 9, ANY_ID),
>>>            .revn = 619,
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>>> index 7c5e0a90b5fb..16241368c2e4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
>>> @@ -252,6 +252,11 @@ static inline int adreno_is_a619(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>>        return gpu->revn == 619;
>>>    }
>>>    +static inline int adreno_is_a619_holi(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>> +{
>>> +    return adreno_is_a619(gpu) && adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(gpu);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    static inline int adreno_is_a630(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>>    {
>>>        return gpu->revn == 630;
>>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
index 75cf94b03c29..c168712a0dc4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
@@ -614,14 +614,14 @@  static void a6xx_set_hwcg(struct msm_gpu *gpu, bool state)
 		return;
 
 	/* Disable SP clock before programming HWCG registers */
-	if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
+	if ((!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu)))
 		gmu_rmw(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_GX_SPTPRAC_CLOCK_CONTROL, 1, 0);
 
 	for (i = 0; (reg = &adreno_gpu->info->hwcg[i], reg->offset); i++)
 		gpu_write(gpu, reg->offset, state ? reg->value : 0);
 
 	/* Enable SP clock */
-	if (!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu))
+	if ((!adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu)))
 		gmu_rmw(gmu, REG_A6XX_GPU_GMU_GX_SPTPRAC_CLOCK_CONTROL, 0, 1);
 
 	gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_CLOCK_CNTL, state ? clock_cntl_on : 0);
@@ -1007,7 +1007,12 @@  static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
 	}
 
 	/* Clear GBIF halt in case GX domain was not collapsed */
-	if (a6xx_has_gbif(adreno_gpu)) {
+	if (adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu)) {
+		gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT, 0);
+		gpu_write(gpu, 0x18, 0);
+		/* Let's make extra sure that the GPU can access the memory.. */
+		mb();
+	} else if (a6xx_has_gbif(adreno_gpu)) {
 		gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT, 0);
 		gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT, 0);
 		/* Let's make extra sure that the GPU can access the memory.. */
@@ -1016,6 +1021,9 @@  static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
 
 	gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_SECVID_TSB_CNTL, 0);
 
+	if (adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu))
+		a6xx_sptprac_enable(gmu);
+
 	/*
 	 * Disable the trusted memory range - we don't actually supported secure
 	 * memory rendering at this point in time and we don't want to block off
@@ -1293,7 +1301,8 @@  static void a6xx_dump(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
 #define GBIF_CLIENT_HALT_MASK	BIT(0)
 #define GBIF_ARB_HALT_MASK	BIT(1)
 #define VBIF_RESET_ACK_TIMEOUT	100
-#define VBIF_RESET_ACK_MASK	0x00f0
+#define VBIF_RESET_ACK_MASK	0xF0
+#define GPR0_GBIF_HALT_REQUEST	0x1E0
 
 static void a6xx_recover(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
 {
@@ -1350,10 +1359,16 @@  static void a6xx_recover(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
 
 	/* Software-reset the GPU */
 	if (adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(adreno_gpu)) {
-		/* Halt the GX side of GBIF */
-		gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT, GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK);
-		spin_until(gpu_read(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT_ACK) &
-			   GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK);
+		if (adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu)) {
+			gpu_write(gpu, 0x18, GPR0_GBIF_HALT_REQUEST);
+			spin_until((gpu_read(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_VBIF_GX_RESET_STATUS) &
+				   (VBIF_RESET_ACK_MASK)) == VBIF_RESET_ACK_MASK);
+		} else {
+			/* Halt the GX side of GBIF */
+			gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT, GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK);
+			spin_until(gpu_read(gpu, REG_A6XX_RBBM_GBIF_HALT_ACK) &
+				   GBIF_GX_HALT_MASK);
+		}
 
 		/* Halt new client requests on GBIF */
 		gpu_write(gpu, REG_A6XX_GBIF_HALT, GBIF_CLIENT_HALT_MASK);
@@ -1763,6 +1778,9 @@  static int a6xx_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
+		if (adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu))
+			a6xx_sptprac_enable(gmu);
+
 		mutex_unlock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
 
 		msm_devfreq_resume(gpu);
@@ -1795,6 +1813,9 @@  static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
 
 		mutex_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock);
 
+		if (adreno_is_a619_holi(adreno_gpu))
+			a6xx_sptprac_disable(gmu);
+
 		ret = clk_prepare_enable(gpu->ebi1_clk);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
index 82757f005a1a..71faeb3fd466 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
@@ -264,6 +264,19 @@  static const struct adreno_info gpulist[] = {
 		.gmem = SZ_512K,
 		.inactive_period = DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD,
 		.init = a6xx_gpu_init,
+	}, {
+		.rev = ADRENO_REV(6, 1, 9, 1),
+		.revn = 619,
+		.name = "A619_holi",
+		.fw = {
+			[ADRENO_FW_SQE] = "a630_sqe.fw",
+		},
+		.gmem = SZ_512K,
+		.inactive_period = DRM_MSM_INACTIVE_PERIOD,
+		.quirks = ADRENO_QUIRK_GMU_WRAPPER,
+		.init = a6xx_gpu_init,
+		.zapfw = "a615_zap.mdt",
+		.hwcg = a615_hwcg,
 	}, {
 		.rev = ADRENO_REV(6, 1, 9, ANY_ID),
 		.revn = 619,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
index 7c5e0a90b5fb..16241368c2e4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
@@ -252,6 +252,11 @@  static inline int adreno_is_a619(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
 	return gpu->revn == 619;
 }
 
+static inline int adreno_is_a619_holi(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
+{
+	return adreno_is_a619(gpu) && adreno_has_gmu_wrapper(gpu);
+}
+
 static inline int adreno_is_a630(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
 {
 	return gpu->revn == 630;