Message ID | 8955b45e35474e5feb826101423470d0b51e5470.1677143700.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | Clarify API for dir.[ch] and unpack-trees.[ch] -- mark relevant fields as internal | expand |
"Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes: > From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> > > Commit 2f6b1eb794 ("cache API: add a "INDEX_STATE_INIT" macro/function, > add release_index()", 2023-01-12) mistakenly added some initialization > of a member of unpack_trees_options that was intended to be > internal-only. Further, it served no purpose as it simply duplicated > the initialization that unpack-trees.c code was already doing. > > Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> > --- > builtin/sparse-checkout.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/builtin/sparse-checkout.c b/builtin/sparse-checkout.c > index 4b7390ce367..8d5ae6f2a60 100644 > --- a/builtin/sparse-checkout.c > +++ b/builtin/sparse-checkout.c > @@ -217,7 +217,6 @@ static int update_working_directory(struct pattern_list *pl) > o.head_idx = -1; > o.src_index = r->index; > o.dst_index = r->index; > - index_state_init(&o.result, r); > o.skip_sparse_checkout = 0; > > setup_work_tree(); The commit message seems to imply that in this code path, there is some code in unpack-trees.c that runs index_state_init(), but that doesn't seem to be the case. memset-ting the result field with a junk value causes valgrind to fail with the following trace: ==2035705== Invalid read of size 8 ==2035705== at 0x30D982: lazy_init_name_hash (name-hash.c:602) ==2035705== by 0x30DDDA: index_file_exists (name-hash.c:721) ==2035705== by 0x3F71A8: check_ok_to_remove (unpack-trees.c:2430) ==2035705== by 0x3F74EE: verify_absent_1 (unpack-trees.c:2495) ==2035705== by 0x3F75C6: verify_absent_sparse (unpack-trees.c:2523) ==2035705== by 0x3F2A15: apply_sparse_checkout (unpack-trees.c:566) ==2035705== by 0x3F6849: update_sparsity (unpack-trees.c:2147) ==2035705== by 0x1FC105: update_working_directory (sparse-checkout.c:228) so it might be better to move the init invocation to update_sparsity() instead of only removing it.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 3:22 PM Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> wrote: > > "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes: > > From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> > > > > Commit 2f6b1eb794 ("cache API: add a "INDEX_STATE_INIT" macro/function, > > add release_index()", 2023-01-12) mistakenly added some initialization > > of a member of unpack_trees_options that was intended to be > > internal-only. Further, it served no purpose as it simply duplicated > > the initialization that unpack-trees.c code was already doing. > > > > Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> > > --- > > builtin/sparse-checkout.c | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/builtin/sparse-checkout.c b/builtin/sparse-checkout.c > > index 4b7390ce367..8d5ae6f2a60 100644 > > --- a/builtin/sparse-checkout.c > > +++ b/builtin/sparse-checkout.c > > @@ -217,7 +217,6 @@ static int update_working_directory(struct pattern_list *pl) > > o.head_idx = -1; > > o.src_index = r->index; > > o.dst_index = r->index; > > - index_state_init(&o.result, r); > > o.skip_sparse_checkout = 0; > > > > setup_work_tree(); > > The commit message seems to imply that in this code path, there is some > code in unpack-trees.c that runs index_state_init(), but that doesn't > seem to be the case. memset-ting the result field with a junk value > causes valgrind to fail with the following trace: > > ==2035705== Invalid read of size 8 > ==2035705== at 0x30D982: lazy_init_name_hash (name-hash.c:602) > ==2035705== by 0x30DDDA: index_file_exists (name-hash.c:721) > ==2035705== by 0x3F71A8: check_ok_to_remove (unpack-trees.c:2430) > ==2035705== by 0x3F74EE: verify_absent_1 (unpack-trees.c:2495) > ==2035705== by 0x3F75C6: verify_absent_sparse (unpack-trees.c:2523) > ==2035705== by 0x3F2A15: apply_sparse_checkout (unpack-trees.c:566) > ==2035705== by 0x3F6849: update_sparsity (unpack-trees.c:2147) > ==2035705== by 0x1FC105: update_working_directory (sparse-checkout.c:228) > > so it might be better to move the init invocation to update_sparsity() > instead of only removing it. Actually, my commit message was implying o->result is only used by unpack_trees() and not update_sparsity(). While that implication is *mostly* true, I forgot about check_ok_to_remove(). Doh! Thanks for reviewing so carefully; I'll move the initialization to update_sparsity() instead.
diff --git a/builtin/sparse-checkout.c b/builtin/sparse-checkout.c index 4b7390ce367..8d5ae6f2a60 100644 --- a/builtin/sparse-checkout.c +++ b/builtin/sparse-checkout.c @@ -217,7 +217,6 @@ static int update_working_directory(struct pattern_list *pl) o.head_idx = -1; o.src_index = r->index; o.dst_index = r->index; - index_state_init(&o.result, r); o.skip_sparse_checkout = 0; setup_work_tree();