Message ID | 20220308082931.3385902-1-shawn.guo@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Delegated to: | Daniel Lezcano |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] cpuidle: psci: Iterate backwards over list in psci_pd_remove() | expand |
On 8.03.2022 09:29, Shawn Guo wrote: > In case that psci_pd_init_topology() fails for some reason, > psci_pd_remove() will be responsible for deleting provider and removing > genpd from psci_pd_providers list. There will be a failure when removing > the cluster PD, because the cpu (child) PDs haven't been removed. > > [ 0.050232] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu0 > [ 0.050278] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu1 > [ 0.050329] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu2 > [ 0.050370] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu3 > [ 0.050422] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu-cluster0 > [ 0.050475] PM: genpd_remove: unable to remove cpu-cluster0 > [ 0.051412] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu3 > [ 0.051449] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu2 > [ 0.051499] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu1 > [ 0.051546] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu0 > > Fix the problem by iterating the provider list reversely, so that parent > PD gets removed after child's PDs like below. > > [ 0.029052] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu0 > [ 0.029076] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu1 > [ 0.029103] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu2 > [ 0.029124] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu3 > [ 0.029151] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu-cluster0 > [ 0.029647] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu0 > [ 0.029666] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu1 > [ 0.029690] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu2 > [ 0.029714] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu3 > [ 0.029738] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu-cluster0 > > Fixes: a65a397f2451 ("cpuidle: psci: Add support for PM domains by using genpd") > Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> > --- Looks like this was never picked up or followed up on? Konrad > Changes since v1: > - Fix commit log > - Pick up Reviewed-by tag from Sudeep and Ulf (Thanks!) > - Add Fixes tag as suggested by Ulf > > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c > index ff2c3f8e4668..ce5c415fb04d 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c > +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c > @@ -182,7 +182,8 @@ static void psci_pd_remove(void) > struct psci_pd_provider *pd_provider, *it; > struct generic_pm_domain *genpd; > > - list_for_each_entry_safe(pd_provider, it, &psci_pd_providers, link) { > + list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(pd_provider, it, > + &psci_pd_providers, link) { > of_genpd_del_provider(pd_provider->node); > > genpd = of_genpd_remove_last(pd_provider->node); >
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 10:46 PM Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org> wrote: > > > > On 8.03.2022 09:29, Shawn Guo wrote: > > In case that psci_pd_init_topology() fails for some reason, > > psci_pd_remove() will be responsible for deleting provider and removing > > genpd from psci_pd_providers list. There will be a failure when removing > > the cluster PD, because the cpu (child) PDs haven't been removed. > > > > [ 0.050232] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu0 > > [ 0.050278] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu1 > > [ 0.050329] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu2 > > [ 0.050370] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu3 > > [ 0.050422] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu-cluster0 > > [ 0.050475] PM: genpd_remove: unable to remove cpu-cluster0 > > [ 0.051412] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu3 > > [ 0.051449] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu2 > > [ 0.051499] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu1 > > [ 0.051546] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu0 > > > > Fix the problem by iterating the provider list reversely, so that parent > > PD gets removed after child's PDs like below. > > > > [ 0.029052] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu0 > > [ 0.029076] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu1 > > [ 0.029103] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu2 > > [ 0.029124] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu3 > > [ 0.029151] CPUidle PSCI: init PM domain cpu-cluster0 > > [ 0.029647] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu0 > > [ 0.029666] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu1 > > [ 0.029690] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu2 > > [ 0.029714] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu3 > > [ 0.029738] PM: genpd_remove: removed cpu-cluster0 > > > > Fixes: a65a397f2451 ("cpuidle: psci: Add support for PM domains by using genpd") > > Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > > Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> > > --- > Looks like this was never picked up or followed up on? Oops! I thought it was already applied. I will ping Rafael with a resend. Shawn
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c index ff2c3f8e4668..ce5c415fb04d 100644 --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c @@ -182,7 +182,8 @@ static void psci_pd_remove(void) struct psci_pd_provider *pd_provider, *it; struct generic_pm_domain *genpd; - list_for_each_entry_safe(pd_provider, it, &psci_pd_providers, link) { + list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(pd_provider, it, + &psci_pd_providers, link) { of_genpd_del_provider(pd_provider->node); genpd = of_genpd_remove_last(pd_provider->node);